Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster said that Apple retail stores are having a very hard time keeping up with demand for the new Mac mini and iPod shuffle. Elsewhere, C|NET News.com has a two-page report on the much-anticipated PowerBook G5 and the fact that it will take a while to materialize in the market.
Apple Stores show zero availability of Mac mini, iPod shuffle
About The Author
Eugenia Loli
Ex-programmer, ex-editor in chief at OSNews.com, now a visual artist/filmmaker.
Follow me on Twitter @EugeniaLoli
127 Comments
First off that review is talking about an emachine. Yes the emachine is an affordable computer. But lets question the quality of the emachine compared to the quality of the mac mini! Would you rather get a cheaply made machine with cheap componets or get a nicely built machine that has a good build quality? I rather spend the extra money and get something that will last. I have many machines, a dual g5, many home built pc’s and an emachine (given to for free). Guess which one has many issues and is dieing? The emachine!!
Also i forgot to add, the emachine is a desktop machine and the mac mini packs so much stuff in a form factor that is so tiny. Try to find an itx machine that compares to the mac mini.
Wow, that’s a good one. That review actually made me laugh. Here are some good parts:
” While the hardware is about roughly equivalent to a Windows PC circa 1995…”
Circa 1995? You have to be kidding me. The mini’s specs are not equivalent to that of a 10 year old x386, sorry.
“As for the style of the unit, it’s alright. It reminds me of a ShuttlePC. But since its sleek look comes at the expense of the parallel port, serial ports, the PS/2 ports and the drive bays, potential Mac mini buyers should ask themselves just how much utility they’re willing to sacrifice for style. Oh, did I forget to mention that the Mini has no PCI slots either? And no floppy disk drive?”
Yeah, you’re right. I wish my computer had those legacy ports too.
“The Mini boots up into a stripped-down operating system which Apple calls OS X, similar to the stripped-down WindowsCE OS found on many handhelds.”
Ok, that is clearly a trolling statement. Give me a break. OS X is like WindowsCE?? Who in their right mind would say such a thing?
“The Mini has got some built-in software for basic computer functions, but it can’t do many common things as well as its grown-up brothers in the Windows world can. The little things can add up to big frustration for someone who might accidentally buy a Mini expecting it to be just like Windows. For example, there is no Outlook Express for email, but Apple includes a program called Mail, which is like a stripped-down email client that can’t execute scripts or open attachments without user intervention.”
“grown-up brothers”? lol. And to say that Outlook Express is better than Mail is equally laughable. It can’t execute scripts? You mean like outlook virus scripts? or do you mean like applescript, which Mail _can_ execute?
and check out this part:
” There is no Mac version of WeatherBug to check the temperature anywhere in the world. Nor is there a Mac version of helpful web and email enhancers like Hotbar. Or any equivalent of the DealHelper software I use to keep track of my passwords. My Office 2003 CD would not install, despite claims I had heard from Mac fanboys that OS X is compatible with Office. Heck, the Internet Explorer icon isn’t even out on the taskbar by default, it’s buried in the c:applications folder.”
I mean, where to begin? No weatherbug? Go to versiontracker and checkout weatherpop or weathermenu. Same thing. I have no idea what hotbar is. He tried to install a pc version of office 2003 on the mac? And this guy is an MCSE?? And he says that IE is not on the “taskbar” but is buried in the “c:” drive? Ok, first it’s the “Dock” not a taskbar. Second, there is no “c:” drive, and third, IE isn’t there because Microsoft hasn’t supported it since 2003.
All I can say is: WOW! and LOL!!!!
my favourite part of the review:
The OS X comes with some system maintenance utilities, but essentials such as a defragmenter or a or registry cleaner are notably absent. I would expect a Mini to get really slow and unstable within a couple months if you can’t perform any routine maintenance tasks on it.
bwahahahah…there is no registry in OS X…i wouldn’t want this man around my computer in any way!
just a note…HFS+ doesn’t fragment as much as that crap that NTFS is (FAT is not an option here) so you don’t need a defragmentation utility.
Just low level MSCE….
(sorry for my english, i’m a lazy italian)
@Renaldo
Apple’s ever present supply problems are a prime reason why they will never compete with the PC market at large.
Now THAT’s just silly…
Apple outsells EVERY individual PC maker. Apple sells more computers than Dell or Gateway or HP/Compaq does individually.
What they DON’T do is outsell every PC Maker put together.
A lot to put on one company, don’t you think???
That’s just silly.
When there were clones (Motorola, DayStar, UMAX, Power Computing, Akai, etc…), Macintosh sales were inching up to 10% of the market…
And would have gone higher still, I believe.
You are right that ONE company can’t outsell 5000 companies.
That you think that means there’s something wrong with Apple, isn’t supported by the data.
I remembered a subject in one of my business classes that covered supply and demand. If you want to create a frenzy for a product, you are SUPPOSED to minimally make enough to meet demand but are supposed to be shorthanded after a week. Reason being is this creates the “must have” feel that consumers get when something new and exciting comes out. If there are alot of the product on the shelf then it creates the “I can wait” feel for consumers because they feel that they can wait until they get more money, check other choices etc.
Problem is many of these customers never come back, if they are told supply is limited due to overwhelming demand then it emphasizes the “I guess if everyone is getting one and they are running out then it must be great!” mentality.
If you create limited supply at first then you get the larger than normal demand at first, later when the hype goes down then you can dump extras on the market because then it becomes the usual commodity.
I am sure Apple plans this and it seems to work all the time. No matter how much people complain and say they got screwed by Apple the sales figures always show they did something right. If you can sell all that you produce then you win. Of course this can be a double edged sword.
Quote: The OS X comes with some system maintenance utilities, but essentials such as a defragmenter or a or registry cleaner are notably absent. I would expect a Mini to get really slow and unstable within a couple months if you can’t perform any routine maintenance tasks on it. Quote:
Oh brother this guy is an idiot, my wife has a mac and I have a mac laptop. I am also MCSE and a sysadmin but this guy sounds like a complete moron on the helpdesk in his first year on the job.
When I tried to uninstall Mozilla for Opera on my wife’s mac the first year we had it, since I was new to Mac OSX I could not find “uninstall” I posted on the web and everyone told me just to drag the folder to the trash bin. I did not believe it was that simple. Of course, it was the right way to do it.
Then I found out later the only program that had an uninstall feature was MICROSOFT OFFICE!, go figure….
Dell is selling them right now. Latitude D810 and D610.
Thanks. But I would be loath to call the pentium m a G4 destroyer. Yes it is a faster chip than any G4. But speedstep makes it run at 600MHz when in battery optimized mode. Unless I am plugged in I am not going to be able to harness the full power of the chip or I don’t get battery life if one were to set it to full performance.
Kind of defeats the purpose of a portable doesn’t it. I know with the P4-M based dells you could neve get it to run fullspeed if unplugged but this was a couple of years ago.
Quote:FYI, new top-of-the-line Sonama laptops have 2.13Ghz Pentium M processors with 2MB of L2 cache, 533Mhz buses, dual-channel DDR2 RAM and PCI express. These machines will absolutely *destroy* the PB G4s speed-wise with anything from 25% – 40% greater general performance.”
DESTROY!! Arghh feel the massive computer power as I run Microsoft office, argh trash, smash TRUE *sarcasm* computing power.
Oh brother please 99 percent of office and home users use their laptops for office applications. Very few buy them to run AutoCad or 3DStudioMax.
If you are upgrading to 512 MB The HD speed isnt going to make a bit a difference with the apps you are planning to use.
A friend of mine has been capturing video with his mini on the internal HD with no problems / no dopped frames.
I’m a little disappointed that the Apple Store is having such a hard time fullfilling orders.
For example, I wanted to treat myself with a new iPod Shuffle 512 MB. Went to the Apple Store and had no luck, nothing in stock. But I drive down the street and go into Best Buy and they have shelves full of them!
It kinda looks bad if you can’t get an Apple product from an Apple Store, but manage to find hundreds at a competitor that is fully stocked.
Apple does this everytime new products become available! They never seem to supply their stores enough, or manage to get restocked fast enough. Who the heck handles inventory for these stores!?
An interesting review: http://www.divisiontwo.com/articles/MacMini2.html
Interesting? No it was stupid.
Comparing a piece o crap emachine to a mini was stupid.
Blabbering on about how Mac users buy Macs because they are brainwashed is stupid.
Bitching about not having ad-aware etc for the Mac is idiotic. You don’t need it or defragmenters or registry cleaners because OS X automatically defragments itself and doesn’t use anything as lame as a registry.
Is there no end to the stupidity of these anti-mac diatribles?
Think before you post.
Apple outsells EVERY individual PC maker. Apple sells more computers than Dell or Gateway or HP/Compaq does individually.
You really are living in a fantasy land.
Dell sold over 5 million units last quarter.
http://www1.us.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/corp/pressoffice…
http://www.divisiontwo.com/articles/MacMini2.html
Why won’t people get it? divisiontwo is a satire site and all stories on that site are fictitious.
Go to divisiontwo.com scroll to the very end and in fine grey print are these words. Conviniently pasted here for your perusal.
All DivisionTwo content is sature. All columnists, authors, reporters, and articles are fictitious.
What is even more funny than the article itself is Anti-Apple shills posting it to make thier point. LOL.
I had a look at the link to and as soon as I saw the note about Safari not having good standards compliance because it could not render MSN properly I realised it was an obviously intentionally uninformed.
I had a look at the link to and as soon as I saw the note about Safari not having good standards compliance because it could not render MSN properly I realised it was an obviously intentionally uninformed.
Well, Safari does ignore CSS styles applied to submit buttons.
From what I can see, Apple would have a higher (lot higher?) market share if they could build enough computers for everyone that wants to buy one. The limiting factor appears to be IBM and Toshiba (or whoever it is that makes hard drives for iPods). It seems they can sell all they can build.
There are a several shrills here on the message board whenever an Apple product is mentioned. It seems to me they either work for MS, word for Apple, and are just sturring things up to get more publicity for Apple creating higher demand for their products.
As for iBooks and Powerbooks being underpowered. That’s pretty funny. A friend of mine has a three year old iBook with a FireWire port and has no problems with speed doing everything he wants.
As for PC laptops, once you install (if it isn’t already) the mandatory AV software you lose about 30% of the CPU’s speed. Apple products certainly aren’t 30% slower. Which means “practical use wise” Apple laptops are actually faster. Unless you like flying fast going the wrong way on the freeway (without AV software).
Yes desktop PCs are cheaper. Cheaper meaning less value for the money. The value of Macs is OS X. Is “just works” compared to Windows. Meaning that you don’t have to spend much of any time (compared to Windows) doing maintenance on Macs. I personally would rather spend my time getting work done than fixing (maintaining) my computer when the OS (and file system) should do that automatically.
The initial cost of a computer is actually quite small compared to the life cost of a computer. Life cost = purchase price + support.
What OSs do I use? Obviously a Mac. But I also play with BeOS, OS/2 (now runs on AMD 64!!!!) and LinSpire.
I work at a company where I am a Systems Analyst where we support multiple versions of Windows on 10,000 computers. Mainly XP. We also support about 200 Macs. Actually we _rarely_ get a call from the Mac people unless the backbone is down or they are buying a new Mac. We are looking at replacing the Windows computers with either Linux or Mac to get away from viruses.
> Based on the mhz numbers? Heh?
> I still have my 500 mhz G4 Powerbook that’s 5 years old
> still going real strong. I use Photoshop, Illustrator, VPC,
> Safari, Email… all at the same time and still runs faster,
> get more things done than my 3 ghz G4 Shuttle I built to
> play games.
Why do various Mac users do this? That is, basically lie about the performance of their older computers? I don’t really comprehend the need to make things up to justify your preference for your platform. While “gets more things done” can assumed to be true simply on the basis of the designation of the computer as an overpriced XBox, unless you have done something remarkably inefficient to cripple the computer, your “3 ghz [P4] Shuttle” is going to be much faster than your 500MHz G4 Powerbook. You’re looking at significantly faster disk, memory, and computational capability.
So why lie? Why do so many Mac users do that sort of thing? You like your 500MHz Powerbook more. That doesn’t need exaggerations. I wouldn’t mind one myself. The ridiculous claims, however, are simply off-putting to put it mildly.
> On the subject of under powered, there is no argument, the
> G4 PowerBooks are little bit slower than the current crop of
> x86 hardware (raw #’s). So what. By the time all the
> necessary precautions are installed (adaware, AV, etc) the
> usable performance levels out. If you are a hardcore gamer,
> no powerbook laptop will suite the demands, nor would a G5
> in a laptop configuration.
AdAware does not make the performance of a computer worse. AntiVirus software can consume its share of memory if it is used as a resident device, but will not hinder performance to the degree you imply, and even using it in this form is unnecessary.
I would say the best reason to avoid any non-P4-M x86 laptop would be that their battery lives and their heat production tends to be annoying to put it mildly. IBM’s Centrino laptops are fairly decent, though.
We must have been lucky then as we bought a Mac Mini from the Apple Store (UK) a few days ago.They seemed to have a few behind the counter at the time.
This probably means that they are selling well. The ipod mini was sold out for a long time. Suprising, considering all the flaming that they are both taking.
Thanks. But I would be loath to call the pentium m a G4 destroyer. Yes it is a faster chip than any G4. But speedstep makes it run at 600MHz when in battery optimized mode.
Just like a G4 in “max saving” mode, you mean ?
Unless I am plugged in I am not going to be able to harness the full power of the chip […]
Of course you can. Just tell it not to step the speed down.
[…] or I don’t get battery life if one were to set it to full performance.
So, just like a G4, then ?
Kind of defeats the purpose of a portable doesn’t it. I know with the P4-M based dells you could neve get it to run fullspeed if unplugged but this was a couple of years ago.
A Pentium 4-M is *not* a Pentium M. Completely different chips.
The issue isn’t over laptops or desktop replacements. Its having a secure product that reassures the person that when using it, you’re not going to be bombarded with port scans searching for access, privet sensitive information that’s for sale to anyone one that wants it, virus’, spyware and all the other hidden dangers that Windows OS has to offer you. No, no matter how many countless patches/updates MS may release you know it’s still not fully secure. The thought of your system being compromised lingers in the back of your mind, always.
That’s the opposite feeling you get when you’re running on a Apple computer.
And this is just the begining of a long line of cheap PCs that will come from Apple so expect the Mac market-share to increase and things change–more so then they already have–when Apple reachese fifteen or higher percent market-share. It will happen and you’ll be the one that will help us. :p :lol@U:
If you think your Apple-branded computer is safe from these problems in any sort of immutable way, then you’re seriously deluding yourself. When the market demand is sufficiently high, there will be all of the spyware, adware, and the like for MacOS X as there is Windows. I wouldn’t even be surprised if there were larger margins per user to be had from Mac users to entice prospective companies to release such junk, given that Mac users probably have more to spend, or are willing to spend more of their disposable income on items that appeal to their sense of vanity.
What you’re selling is basically a superficial peace of mind that borders on being dangerous, as more Windows users ditch their PCs from what they perceive to be a more secure, less-corrupted platform, the assholes that make using Windows such a pain will follow. The people that currently have problems with adware and spyware will think the behavior that gave them that problem in Windows will think that it’s perfectly safe on their shiny new Mac, and the whole mess will start all over again.
The article was probably written by a Mac head ridiculing power user PC funboi’s expecatations of the Mini like the idea of wanting to run Adaware and such. Have fun!
Just like a G4 in “max saving” mode, you mean ?
The G4s clock down to 1/3 max clock frequency???? No they don’t. G4s do throttle the clock but not nearly as aggressively as the Pentium-Ms.
So, just like a G4, then ?
Not really. A G4 in battery optimized mode doesn’t throttle down in the same order of magnitude of max core frequency as the Pentium-Ms do.
Kind of defeats the purpose of a portable doesn’t it. I know with the P4-M based dells you could neve get it to run fullspeed if unplugged but this was a couple of years ago.
A Pentium 4-M is *not* a Pentium M. Completely different chips.
I think the original poster knows that, notice the “but this was couple of years ago” at the end.
If you didn’t have this false air of superiority about all your posts, we might actually get some real discussion going.
“If you think your Apple-branded computer is safe from these problems in any sort of immutable way, then you’re seriously deluding yourself. When the market demand is sufficiently high, there will be all of the spyware, adware, and the like for MacOS X as there is Windows.”
The difference isn’t how many each has. The clue is that one has a $50 lock and the other something worse about 5 cents. Guess which is which.
Mac OS X is built on top of BSD UNIX. Which OS is the most secure (one that isn’t connect to the internet – drum spot)? It’s BSD UNIX. Even the U.S. govt security people say so.
Windows makes Swiss cheese look like a solid block of titanium. There are more holes in Windows than in all the golf courses on the planet. THAT’s why there are more successful viruses and worms for Windows. When there are that many holes it makes it fun for virus writers to write viruses.
The G4s clock down to 1/3 max clock frequency???? No they don’t. G4s do throttle the clock but not nearly as aggressively as the Pentium-Ms.
[…]
Not really. A G4 in battery optimized mode doesn’t throttle down in the same order of magnitude of max core frequency as the Pentium-Ms do.
*Can* do. Pentium Ms can throttle down along a range of about half a dozen different clock speeds – usually from less than 10% slower to over 50% slower. They can also do so dynamically depending on system load, if so configured. So you can have your Pentium M laptop blasting along at full speed all the time, minimum speed all the time, something in between, or let the system manage itself to drop the clock speed dramatically when idle and crank it back up when busy.
AFAIK the G4’s throtting capabilties aren’t anywhere near this advanced – they’re either “fast” or “slow”, just like the Pentium 4-M the poster I was responding to was (incorrectly) extrapolating Pentium M behaviour from.
Mac OS X is built on top of BSD UNIX.
Actually it’s built on top of Mach. BSD != OS X. Something true for BSD is not automatically true for BSD.
Which OS is the most secure (one that isn’t connect to the internet – drum spot)? It’s BSD UNIX. Even the U.S. govt security people say so.
Where ? Do they say it’s more secure or do they just say it’s cracked less ? There *is* a significant difference between those two things.
Do they give specifics as to *why* it’s more secure, and in what circumstances ? What are those reasons ?
There are more holes in Windows than in all the golf courses on the planet.
Can you list some ?
THAT’s why there are more successful viruses and worms for Windows.
90%+ of viruses and worms exploit end user stupidity, not security holes.
Exploits of actualy security *holes* – and not just end user ignorance – are few and far between. Take out the ones caused by coding bugs and not fundamental problems and you’re down to a *very* short list.
When there are that many holes it makes it fun for virus writers to write viruses.
Very few pieces of malicious code actually exploit the system. Even fewer do it via problems that haven’t already been fixed.
Obscurity and barrier-of-entry costs do far, far more to discourage virus writers from attacking OS X than any additional “security” inherent to the system.
I don’t think this shortage of minimacs is made intentional by Apple because the more they sell the better quarter they have and thus more investors funneling money into the company. Apple would be cutting off their arms if they played with this superficial supply equation. Simply, Apple underestimated the minis sold just like IBM did with their original PC. Either that or the channel isn’t there for Apple yet. Maybe it costs too much or for whatever business reasons. But the good is that Target/Amazon have their own channels to help Apple. Apple just needs to manufacture these minis a lot and shovel them thru these retailers.
There are two issues I have with mac and not sure if they can be fixed. First is their menu bar not attached to the current window and second is the close window button located on the left side rather than right side. Maybe Apple designers were left handed or something. I also agree that mac users haven’t experienced the inflow of virus writers yet. That will happen when their urser base goes up as nowdays not many bother writing viruses for macs.
When the market demand is sufficiently high, there will be all of the spyware, adware, and the like for MacOS X as there is Windows.
This is the bullshit argument that Windows is exploited because it’s ubiquitous. Apache is the most widespread web server in use (about 60+% of all webservers) yet Microsoft’s IIS server is the most vulnerable and most exploited web server. Ubiquity has nothing to do with exploits. Microsoft products get exploited because they are uniquely vulnerable. When Gates and Ballmer talk about “security” they’re talking about DRM, not system vulnerabilities and exploits.
… as more Windows users ditch their PCs from what they perceive to be a more secure, less-corrupted platform, the assholes that make using Windows such a pain will follow. The people that currently have problems with adware and spyware will think the behavior that gave them that problem in Windows will think that it’s perfectly safe on their shiny new Mac…
The “assholes” (a designation with which I agree whole heartedly) may follow the movement away from Windows, but they will have a much harder time inflicting the pain. The architecture of Winxxx makes it almost trivial to exploit and create system wide havoc. Systems based on a *nix architecture are more difficult to exploit and even more difficult to inflict system wide damage.
…and the whole mess will start all over again.
The sooner we move away from Windows the sooner the whole mess which is caused by the inherent design flaws of Windows will go away. Personally, I don’t think the whole mess will start all over again.
Apple outsells EVERY individual PC maker. Apple sells more computers than Dell or Gateway or HP/Compaq does individually.
Er I’m not even going to bother posting the link because anyone with google can easily find it but Dell led the market in 2004 with 31 million units shipped during the year.
Thats Dell alone.
Even the Mac faithful are getting impatient. It looks like Apple’s underpowered laptops will continue to lose customers to the growing market of desktop replacement systems offered by Dell and Sager.
I don’t know what others think, but I’d rather have an underpowered PowerBook than anything from Dell or Sager.
I’ve gotta ask, given that you’re so quick: do you just constantly hit reload and wait for an Apple-related article to appear so that you can inject your usual bit of negativity here? Is there anything about Apple or its products that you don’t view in a negative manner? Especially curious about the second.
Relevant to the topic at hand, it’s hard to judge the context of the shortage without knowing how much of these things Apple had stockpiled, and what rate they’re shipping out at. Apple tends not to build inventories in advance, and plan their production rate for the long term, rather than the initial rush, so these sorts of shortages are somewhat typical. If they’re still in short supply in another month or so, then we know they’ve got a hit on their hands.
Maybe you are right. But I will not change a powerbook for any other laptop, specially a Dell. Dell with the P4 extreme has the same problems that Apple is trying to avoid: Heat and Weight. 110 Watts. 9 something pounds. I dont think so.
> Even the Mac faithful are getting impatient. It looks like Apple’s underpowered laptops will continue to lose customers to the growing market of desktop replacement systems offered by Dell and Sager.
How are the new PowerBooks underpowered? These are the fastest OS X notebooks you can buy, this constant comparing Apple to x86 hardware is so pointless unless of course you’re buying an Apple PowerBook to install Linux on it.
At the moment I’m just waiting on my work to approve my purchase of a new 15″ PowerBook on salary sacrifice, it’s a great looking OS X notebook, but like most Mac users I look forward to the Dual Core Freescale or the G5 PowerBooks when ever they turn up.
I ordered my Mini from the Apple store the day after they were available and mine still isnt set to ship for another week.
Maybe you are right. But I will not change a powerbook for any other laptop, specially a Dell. Dell with the P4 extreme has the same problems that Apple is trying to avoid: Heat and Weight. 110 Watts. 9 something pounds. I dont think so.
Read my post again. I said “desktop replacement”, not ultraportable. If I wanted the ultraportable I would have gotten something with the P4M processor or would’ve taken a second look at the powerbooks, but Apple doesn’t even offer the type of machine that I need.
How are the new PowerBooks underpowered? These are the fastest OS X notebooks you can buy.
Hehe, compare powerbooks to other powerbooks. Now that’s funny.
> I ordered my Mini from the Apple store the day after they were available and mine still isnt set to ship for another week.
Welcome to the wonderful world of Apple pre-orders I had to wait 8 weeks for delivery of my PowerMac G5 when I ordered it, it’s an Apple thing you’ll get used to it one day
>How are the new PowerBooks underpowered? These are the fastest OS X notebooks you can buy.
>Hehe, compare powerbooks to other powerbooks. Now that’s funny.
Really I had no idea these other notebooks could run OS X, can you please paste a link so I can get a Dell with OS X installed?
I want a Dell with OS X give me a link please?
http://www.opendarwin.org/
Good luck getting it working but maybe someday.
It does work on x86 hardware, I have just never really gotten X working well.
how are they under powered? if you buy a dell with a intel pentium m your only going to get about 1.6 Ghz which is what apple is offering in their 15 and 17 inch note books, i know i shouldnt be comparing the PPC processors to the x86 since both archetectures are different, but you also have to consider that you will get many more programs ready to run with your apple than with your windows notebook, also apple notebooks usually have better battery life, so you have to take everything into consideration, not just hardware.
OpenDarwin isn’t OS X. I know for a fact that Lumbergh can’t give me a link to an x86 box running OS X, I just don’t understand his fanning the flames for his own personal reasons which have no basis in reality. The current PowerBooks are the fastest OS X portables you can buy, comparing them to x86 hardware is utterly pointless.
> Before I bought my Sager I looked at Apple notebooks for a desktop replacement.
Apple notebooks aren’t desktop replacements… they are portables, and engineered to be as portable as they can.
This mean:
– Long battery life
– Light weight
– Small formfactor
And, as far as I can tell the Powerbooks excel at those qualities. So, don’t blame the Powerbooks for being something that they aren’t.
You have a very strange point of view.
(PS. Sorry my poor english, I’m no native speaker)
Apple notebooks aren’t desktop replacements… they are portables, and engineered to be as portable as they can.
Uhhh, yeah and that’s why I said it was a problem for me.
. So, don’t blame the Powerbooks for being something that they aren’t.
No, I wouldn’t blame a Vic20 for being a AMD64-3200.
That would be so awesome. A Dell with OS X.
/me drools….
Based on the mhz numbers? Heh?
I still have my 500 mhz G4 Powerbook that’s 5 years old still going real strong. I use Photoshop, Illustrator, VPC, Safari, Email… all at the same time and still runs faster, get more things done than my 3 ghz G4 Shuttle I built to play games.
“That would be so awesome. A Dell with OS X. ”
Ok, you have got to be kidding. The last place I would want to see my beloved OS X is on some fugly Dell black plastic monster.
Steve Jobs is just a person Lumbergh, he doesn’t have a distortion field around him. Seriously he doesn’t. No human does.
Ok, you have got to be kidding. The last place I would want to see my beloved OS X is on some fugly Dell black plastic monster.
I’m sure you would be forced into buying an ugly black Dell monster to run OSX.
apple could make the powerbooks slower and i’d still buy them. want to know why? because they run os x, and no POS dell or sager will.
After the weak response to the Cube is it wise for Apple to overstock the Mini? As an APPL stockholder I am quite happy that they didn’t build a few million of them initially.
Is that on the front page of Apple.com they have a picture of the mini with the text “now shipping”.
Better to have a demand than to build to many. I’m guessing that’s Apple’s business model. Building to many Cubes probably did it to them. I do think the Cube looks better than the Mini. Where is the Dual 3gig promised last summer?
A good hack would be to change that sign on the front page to read “Out of Stock”.
didn’t G4 powerbooks come out c.2000-01, way after G4 powermacs were out? I remember reading a CompUSA ad with a 667Mhz powerbook G4 around that time. I also remember that when I saw the ad, I thought to myself ” Didn’t the first powermac G4 w/dual 450Mhz chips come out a long time ago?” I figured that the powerbook in the ad was the first our second Rev. with a G4. I’m probably realy wrong, it was a long time ago (I’m just 17) a year felt a lot longer back then. But am I at least a little bit right? Did the G4 books come way later than the G4 powermac?
I hope no one is surprised by this, this always happens. Not really apples fault, it’s just the simple matter that apple people pounce on stores when even a simple update comes out. Only in apple world can something like the tweak to the powerbooks yesterday be considered “new powerbooks” when it was a update that any other company in the world makes every other day and no one cares.
I am bummed about the shuffle, since they are something that can be punched out like nothing. I went to the apple store a few days after they were announced and they were sold out. They said they had a waiting list going, and that they had got a shipment of 512meggers the day before and were already sold out (curious how much a shipment is). I delayed but did order my 1 gig, it’s set to be shipped the 24th. What a bummer, really could use it for moving files around at work, and the music is a good plus. I’m sure they got a massive demand for them, but seams like they should have been able to build up production of them very well before launch. A robot can build the whole thing.
I think apple often makes sure not to have enough on launch to cause this to happen to some degree to show how great they are selling “hey look, we can’t make them fast enough, we got a block buster here”
apple could make the powerbooks slower and i’d still buy them. want to know why? because they run os x, and no POS dell or sager will.
Oh, so now Dells and Sagers are POS because they don’t run OSX?
Here ya go. http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif
I think that Apple needs to take some lessons from Dell in filling out orders. I have been buying Apples from way back in the days of the original PPC 601, and Apples distribution system has all ways been ham and egg. They never have enough to satisfy demand, and if they do, somehow they screw up the delivery. I wish that in all this time, they had learned how to get this problem fixed. On another note, I am still waiting for my Mac mini to arrive too. Damn, the anticipation is killing me!
During the early days of the ThinkPad laptops, IBM used to plan a cycle of machines and *expected* constrained supplies knowing that corps would order them, it’s cheap advertising, all the news site reporting that supplies are tight hints that it’s a *hot* product, then they’d flood the channel in catch up before shutting down manufacturing to start ramping for the next model revision at about 4.5 months, in a 6 month cycle.
Considering that the Mini is clearly a Rev A device, I’d expect that in about 6 weeks, the Mini supplies will be same day on stock machines, 3-5 days on BTO’s and in 6 months, say @ WWDC, the Mini Rev B boxes will be announced with near immediate availability and have some upgrades to make Video with H.264 a reality.
The iPod Shuffle is a different baby. I think they hedged on the off chance it’s limitations prevented a rapid uptake. Considering it’s design, ramping up it’s manufacturing shouldn’t be a major hurdle, so an early supply constraint is a good thing in the marketing.
On the subject of under powered, there is no argument, the G4 PowerBooks are little bit slower than the current crop of x86 hardware (raw #’s). So what. By the time all the necessary precautions are installed (adaware, AV, etc) the usable performance levels out. If you are a hardcore gamer, no powerbook laptop will suite the demands, nor would a G5 in a laptop configuration.
I have a desktop replacement Toshiba and a PowerBook. You know where my Toshiba stays ? on the desktop, 1.5 hours of battery at best, terrible screen (high res, poor contrast and brightness), and my god it gets hot. 90% of the time I use it via Remote Desktop from the PowerBook either local or over the VPN. My PowerBook goes everywhere with me, and while it’s a touch slower, I’m more productive on it. It doesn’t help that Windows has destroyed itself twice this year, eating 3 full days each time to get it fully restored. That’s significant lost time that the 10 or 15% speed boost doesn’t make up for over the course of a year.
The reality is, if you want to justify your purchase, it’s easy enough to justify either side, use what suits your needs and let other people make objective decisions based upon their needs, not your own.
D
I think, atleast at one time, Apple’s mobile products out-sold their desktop products.
Well, they used to sell their G4 laptops in some big volume compared to everything else.
I have no doubt that the PowerBook G5 will likely increase Apple’s marketshare as Apple has established itself well.
As for the product shortages – That is bad planning with their management – what a shame. I know it may be unexpected for a lot of people that these things are selling like crazy but I would think that apple’s management would know this.
I’m loving Apple more and more everyday…
I understand that PowerBooks are not what you want. That’s fine.
You want a desktop replacement, they are not that. That’s a valid point, too.
They may be underpowerd for what you want.
Is it overpriced? It is, if you buy them to meet your needs.
The key here is that you are barking at a wrong tree.
Your real complaint is that Apple does not make a type of computer you want, namely a desktop replacement laptop. But you are blaming a different type of products not being another type.
It’s like you are complaing that Lexus (or any other company) does not make a pickup truck, and calls their SUV overpriced and underpowered. The thing is they are made for different needs.
The key here is that you are barking at a wrong tree.
Your real complaint is that Apple does not make a type of computer you want, namely a desktop replacement laptop. But you are blaming a different type of products not being another type.
I’m not the only one that would consider a powerbook G5 at a reasonable price. Read the article.
It’s like you are complaing that Lexus (or any other company) does not make a pickup truck, and calls their SUV overpriced and underpowered. The thing is they are made for different needs.
The first part of your post was decent, but then you jumped the shark with the tired car analogy.
That said, I’m about “this” close to picking up a mini if I can find a cheap panel.
Well, mine was “shipped” last Friday but still hasn’t left China. I’m a little irritated by that. Apple has reimbursed me my shipping $$$, but FedEx had nothing worthwhile to say when I called. “Customs”. ;( Supposedly it will be loaded onto a plane tonight. Bah. Then it has to go through US customs.
What really irks me is that it will come Friday or Saturday I bet, when I won’t be here. ARRRRGH! What are you doing to me Apple!? I’m getting an ulcer.
Hope you do. That’s how I ended up using a Mac. Bought an iBook (G3/600) as a plaything to check out OS X on the side while I carried a Dell (and later a Compaq) laptop as my primary machine. Ultimately the OS and tools made it easy for me to switch. (http://www.druware.com/articles/switching.html). At that point, an iBook was a decent entry point.
That article was written in almost 2 years ago today, and the downsides then have improved dramatically, and since then I’ve replaced the iBook with a PowerBook and replaced my old home built Dual PIII900 desktop with a PM G5 with Dual 2.0’s in it. I really can’t emphasize enough how shocked I was that I switched, it wasn’t by intent or design, it simply happened…
I wish you luck on your experiment 🙂
D
Risc wrote:
OpenDarwin isn’t OS X. I know for a fact that Lumbergh can’t give me a link to an x86 box running OS X, I just don’t understand his fanning the flames for his own personal reasons which have no basis in reality. The current PowerBooks are the fastest OS X portables you can buy, comparing them to x86 hardware is utterly pointless.
Offtopic but I’ll bite
Incorrect. OpenDarwin is OS X minus the Aqua Layer. So the entire brains, internetworking services, device driver layer so on and so forth is OS X.
Apple does not include Aqua for obvious reasons. What people aren’t grasping is that OpenDarwin a growing release of ports that were previously only available in OS X, like dp-cocoa.
http://www.opendarwin.org/en/projects.html
I used to work with several of these people. They work at Apple and on the GNUstep project.
They have the sources synched up:
http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.3.7/
equivalent to:
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.3.7/ (Darwin7.7)
Too bad they don’t list a timeline tracking system for people to see how much this project has grown and continues to grow.
Apple has been quite clear that Quartz/Quartz Extreme Window Server and other high level portions of OS X won’t be ported to x86.
Personally, I’d wait until OpenDarwin.org Release 8 and hopefully that’s enough of a timeline to have more device driver support added to the ISO.
Linux works just fine on x86. Or FreeBSD for that matter.
You are correct in saying that it isn’t OS X in the sense of what people think OS X is (i.e., Aqua, iLife, MS Office, etc.,) and it does take effort to install a binary 10.3 release equivalent and if you want to be current on the low level you have to rsynch and build the source tree to have it updated to 10.3.7.
And like I said, for x86 we have several options already. For PPC we can run Linux or we can run OS X that was designed specifically to leverage the PowerPC chipsets.
Ontopic:
Apple has resolved its ordering infrastructure issues. Believe it or not they have a 1-3 day maximum stock business model they adhere to, regardless of how potentially popular a new piece of hardware may become.
It doesn’t mean they haven’t planned for this potential backlog of orders. The Mac mini will do much in terms of future develop projections making the next revision instead of seeing 4 week backlogs a more typical 1 week backlog, even if it is in high demand.
Apple wouldn’t be signing contracts with outfits like Best Buy if they couldn’t agree to a target Best Buy predicts they can sell or that Apple needs them to meet or exceed.
The new powerbooks are nice systems. I want to develop in Xcode and have the elegance of UNIX for my work in areas like LaTeX. I have Linux for my x86 UNIX needs and the Penguin works admirably.
When I use PPC hardware I know my investment in code on Linux will be transferable to OS X, including ObjC using GNUstep. With a few IB modifications from Gorm I can work in either environment.
I’m just waiting for Tiger to buy PPC hardware. I get ObjC++ for both x86 and PPC at that time as Apple mergers this into GCC.
I don’t play games on my computer: I use a Playstation for that.
I don’t write in Word I use LaTeX and export my options of dvi, ps, pdf, eps and other stuff as I need it.
Productivity to me is multitasking, not game playing and having the latest device driver for a GPU that was designed for gamers and not other specialized industries.
I can see people being upset about the PowerMacs not being 3Ghz and above, or having the option to purchase the variety of GPU add-ons as they can in the x86 world.
At least ATI is starting to step up.
http://www.ati.com/support/drivers/mac/macosx-jan-2005-update.html
I’d personally be buying the X800 card.
In the meantime, Apple should update its G5 PowerMacs with either 512MB Ram or 1Gig Ram before BTO, while at current prices.
I was about to make a point about the constrained supply .. but you’ve worded it much more eloquently. I guess the problem for Apple is wether or not this will lead to a loss in sales.
I haven’t ordered a Mac mini but from impulse buying experience (which dwells on the public at large too), that if I don’t have it right away, I get frustrated. This not only could cause some to cancel orders but lead to a ‘negative’ experience with Apple. I think its a risky business move (and old tactic).
“I guess the problem for Apple is wether or not this will lead to a loss in sales.”
As history shows, usually not. Take a look at ipod sales, circa Christmas 2003. Mass shortages, long delays, retailers of out stock everywhere, and what happened?
apple sold 8+million ipods in 2004, or about 80% of the 10million ipods apple has sold since they were introduced in 2001.
I really like the new PowerBook, prices are getting better, and they are offering more. If they could get prices down a few more hundred dollars Apple would see much better sales.
LOL. Yes Apple will keep loosing customers. Just like in the past two years. LOL. Please, it is the best stock out there.
Nice writeup regarding your Mac experience. You didn’t gloss over the problems that you’ve had with OSX.
I noticed that you had some templates for C#/Mono on Xcode? How extensible is Xcode? Does it have a powerful plugin system like eclipse? If Apple would have gone with Dylan instead of Objective-C I would have had an OSX box years ago.
As you can probably figure out, I’m a developer too. Now for work-work, I just use Linux because everything we sell runs on Linux, but at home I like to experiment with various languages and development environments and I’ve found that windows still has the best selection unless you think that Emacs is the epitomy of a great development environment.
Just my 2 cents regarding the apple powerbooks being underpowered. Yes, I agree it might be somewhat underpowered but, the it just works(TM) experience and the fact that the battery seems to last forever … I love mine.
I have had many cheap crappy plastic Dell laptops supplied to me by companies I work for. I travel a fair amount and these pieces of junk die with regular monotony. They are crap. Trying to compare a lowest common denominator Dell anything to a Powerbook is laughable.
how are they under powered? if you buy a dell with a intel pentium m your only going to get about 1.6 Ghz which is what apple is offering in their 15 and 17 inch note books, i know i shouldnt be comparing the PPC processors to the x86 since both archetectures are different, but you also have to consider that you will get many more programs ready to run with your apple than with your windows notebook, also apple notebooks usually have better battery life, so you have to take everything into consideration, not just hardware.
FYI, new top-of-the-line Sonama laptops have 2.13Ghz Pentium M processors with 2MB of L2 cache, 533Mhz buses, dual-channel DDR2 RAM and PCI express. These machines will absolutely *destroy* the PB G4s speed-wise with anything from 25% – 40% greater general performance.
OpenDarwin is OS X minus the Aqua Layer. So the entire brains, internetworking services, device driver layer so on and so forth is OS X.
So Microsoft could take OpenDarwin and make a version of thier Windows over it.
The first part of your post was decent, but then you jumped the shark with the tired car analogy.
You misunderstoo me. That’s not what I meant. I should have not used any sort of car analogy, even if mine was nothing to do with “Apple is BMW of computer” at all.
In my analogy, I didn’t mean to imply “Apple is Lexus (thus luxury product) in computer industry” either. I just chose that one because they don’t make pickup trucks.
Let’s say it’s Hundai instead of Lexus. It’s the same thing. You can complain that they don’t make pickups since they offer longer warranty, which you desire (like OS X).
But complaining that their SUV line can’t do what you want from pickup truck is misguided.
Anyway, Powerbooks might be overpriced and underpowerd for things which you want to do, since you don’t seem to care about other things than horsepower. That’s perfectly fine.
But calling it overprice and underpowered in general term is wrong. To others, what you value most can be non factor or low priority items.
Even without OS X, I don’t think I can find better priced hardeware than Powerbooks for what I want. Since I don’t really care about processing power (G4 1.6ghz is plenty for me), other things Powerbook provides make this machine much better deal than others. So to me, it’s a sweet deal.
FYI, new top-of-the-line Sonama laptops have 2.13Ghz Pentium M processors with 2MB of L2 cache, 533Mhz buses, dual-channel DDR2 RAM and PCI express. These machines will absolutely *destroy* the PB G4s speed-wise with anything from 25% – 40% greater general performance.
Where can one buy said Sonoma based laptops? They aren’t available yet.
When they are available they will probably outperform the G4 based powerbooks. But since they aren’t here yet, the parent post is comparing current systems.
Has anyone tried installing linux on the minis yet? I’d love to know of it runs, and what hardware problems, if any, there are. For $2k a little cluster of 4 of these isn’t bad for $$$/performance.
—
New Equal Opportunity Mac Mini Conga
http://www.fresh83.com/conga
I havent tried linux on my mini yet but I think i recall reading that the fan controller chipset isnt supported yet so the fan will run at full speed (which isnt that loud anyway..)
Apple’s ever present supply problems are a prime reason why they will never compete with the PC market at large.
I pre-ordered iPod Shuffle: picked it up 4 days after it came into the store and was informed that stock had sold out in 2 days, so it was lucky I pre-ordered. They were keeping my order under the counter and using it to show to prospective customers: after I left, they’d have had nothing to show customers.
Apple launched the Mac mini and the iPod shuffle in the UK on the 29th of January, and I went down to the Apple Store to pick up my Mac min. I’m glad I did now!
pac
why is everyone always comparing powerbooks with x86 Laptops? It seems everyone is out in the PC world to BRAG, ” hey i got this sanoma with …….” . Do any of you people actually do REAL work?
I have a powerbook, an old Titanium 1 ghz, 512MB ram. Its a few years old and it still does anything i throw at it. It even runs tiger VERY fast (developers edition). I do all my work on it and it hasnt let me down. Granted, it doesnt speed away in iDVD encoding but it works, no crash whatesoever and no reinstall of anything, even jaguar to panther upgrade worked like a charm.
Overall a powerbook is a machine that packs power not in the raw performance but in the way how its built, and how it performs overall.
My 2c
–FR
http://www.2blocksaway.com/
“Where can one buy said Sonoma based laptops? They aren’t available yet.
When they are available they will probably outperform the G4 based powerbooks. But since they aren’t here yet, the parent post is comparing current systems.”
Dell is selling them right now. Latitude D810 and D610.
Steve Jobs is just a person Lumbergh, he doesn’t have a distortion field around him. Seriously he doesn’t. No human does.
Not true, you can’t see it on the webcasts [maybe it’ll be visible on the H.264 encoding] but a half-second before Steve steps onto the podium, there’s a brief ripple in the space-time continium, like a warp bubble forming. Everybody becomes real exited after that and Steve’s presentations are just awesome.
I’ve been there once myself and it was only by looking for it that I just got a glimpse of it. It’s over in the blink of an eye. When the presentation is over, the field just dissipates and you are left with a really deep satisfied feeling, even though you don’t know quite why.
Rather agreeable though.
I took my POS Dell Latitude D600 home from work. I parked it in the living room. Took it back to the office and started up. The hard drive had died. Years of work, countless files, all gone to the big bit bucket in the sky. That’s the second hard drive in two years time. I had one Mac drive die on me in 10 years.
Which reminds me that I have to do a backup of my data again. Running your machine all day every day for months without a hitch will make you so lax in the follow-up of basic common sense safety procedures.
I can tell from bitter personal experience that you WANT to backup your data. It’s a MAJOR PITA to lose data you can’t replace. Don’t let it happen to you. Backup your data. Do it today if it’s been a while.
Sorry for going slightly OT, but I have a question – I would like an entry level Mac, but am unsure as to whether the eMac is as good as the Mac Mini? I know that it does not look as good (IMO), and I would have a CRT instead of a TFT, since I would not buy a new free-standing CRT, given the choice. However my needs for this box are very limited:
MS office – especially Word and Excel
Web Browsing/email
Educational software
Costing wise, the eMac comes out cheaper, by the time I add a TFT and keyboard + mouse (UK prices).
I did go up to my local Mac dealer last w/e, intent on buying the Mini, but as with everywhere else, they did not have any – now I am torn between my head (eMac) and heart (Mac Mini), and my Dilbertness (iMac – but I can’t really justify that!)
I intend to upgrade any mac to 512Mb though!
“Sorry for going slightly OT, but I have a question – I would like an entry level Mac, but am unsure as to whether the eMac is as good as the Mac Mini? I know that it does not look as good (IMO), and I would have a CRT instead of a TFT, since I would not buy a new free-standing CRT, given the choice. However my needs for this box are very limited:
MS office – especially Word and Excel
Web Browsing/email
Educational software
Costing wise, the eMac comes out cheaper, by the time I add a TFT and keyboard + mouse (UK prices).
I did go up to my local Mac dealer last w/e, intent on buying the Mini, but as with everywhere else, they did not have any – now I am torn between my head (eMac) and heart (Mac Mini), and my Dilbertness (iMac – but I can’t really justify that!)
I intend to upgrade any mac to 512Mb though!”
Go for the eMac. Faster hdd and more upgrade options. The mini is damned sexy, but not as practical.
Thanks for the advice – I had not considered the HD speed.
One thing I forgot to ask, and again apologies for going OT here, but how would you rate the eMac screen? Is it flat or curved? Are the colours/sharpness good?
An interesting review: http://www.divisiontwo.com/articles/MacMini2.html
Aftermarket products and hype starting. I think we are going to see a lot of accessories coming down the road for the mac mini.
http://www.123macmini.com/news/story/1.html
http://www.123macmini.com/news/story/2.html
Objective C isn’t that bad, and XCode also supports AppleScript (cringe), Objective C, C, C++ & Java out of the box. It is extensible, but it’s not well documented as to how yet. It’s certainly not to the level of VS.NET and Eclipse, but it’s improving and XCode 2 looks to be even more so.
An interesting review: