Here are a few screenshots of applications on YellowTAB‘s Zeta: “BeTunes is coming along well, the TimeLiner management app looks promising, the Tracker configuration is easy and very useful. MeTOS, the developing tool is fully functional and will speed up your coding adventures. AbiWord is a tight word processor and for simple editing use Zedit, the enhanced text editor. As you will see, the Network configuration has dramatically improved over R5. If you develop an app that requires network settings you can add a tab to the configuration panel.”
New YellowTAB Screenshots Posted
About The Author
Eugenia Loli
Ex-programmer, ex-editor in chief at OSNews.com, now a visual artist/filmmaker.
Follow me on Twitter @EugeniaLoli
90 Comments
Czeslaw, those screenshots are gorgeous. I would order this OS if it looked like that. The screenshots for yellowtabs demo are not to my liking however. It just looks tossed together and is not smooth…which is the reason everytime I try moving to linux, I move back to OS X and Windows.
Hello, Snake.
You really should try BeOS…it’s fast. Insanely fast. I have no patience for other OSes now. You can download BeOS R5 Personal Edition for free from this location:
http://www.bebits.com/app/2680
You don’t even need to create a new partition: the entire OS (in this version) installs in a single file within your Windows or Linux installation. This makes trying it out really easy.
Or you could download the Max Edition from this location:
http://www.bebits.com/app/3148
and install onto a separate partition.
Czeslaw
This looks _NOTHING_ like the original BeOS we knew and loved. The “DANO” theme was something Be was messing around with, I dont think they had any intention of its widespread use. Its horribly ugly.
Zeta is moving backwards, in my opinion, as a former BeOS developer (back when Be, Inc was in existance). It makes me sick looking at those horrible GUI shots, not at all clean like BeOS. Their icons are awful too.
JLS
Hello, Jay.
Your post emphasizes an important point: good looks and usability *are* really important, especially for people who are approaching a new operating system for the first time.
It’s a matter of a good first impression…which is why default UI settings are also important, in my view.
Czeslaw
Czeslaw,
I agree fully. Those screenshots of OBOS have really gotten me excited. I want to try it out so bad. That’s what an OS should do for people…excite them. This is the most exciting GUI for an OS I have seen since the first screenshots of OS X and now being a fulltime OS X user for 3 years I wish it looked like the OBOS.
I know openbeos.org but are there any other sources of info? Is it downloadable?
Its no problem at all to create a theme like that, a complete copy would be harder. ( deskbar etc ).
I realised that are not many limitations in the Skinning ( SemiTransperency is the only I am aware of ).
/Konrad
Hello, Jay.
The OpenBeOS Project is making rapid strides toward an initial release, but it is not ready yet. You can follow the progress of this inspiring project at http://www.OpenBeOS.org. The newsletters (linked at left on the homepage) are fun to read, and there is also a really active general mailing list for enthusiasts and well-wishers that you could sign up for at this location:
http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=openbeos
One thing that is really exciting (for me) about OpenBeOS — soon to be given a new name, by the way, based on the results of an open poll about a year ago that solicited 3300 initial candidate names! — is that the operating system will be an open source OS, much like Linux. I would encourage you to read the FAQ which is also accessible from the OpenBeOS homepage.
Czeslaw
Hello, Fye.
Since you mentioned the Gonx UI concept for BeOS, I thought that others might appreciate having a link where they could see some sketches. So here it is:
http://cotito.free.fr/projects/gonx+index.html
The commentary is in French, but the screenshots are still all there for viewing by anyone.
Czeslaw
how can you guys complain about the scrollbars, titlebars, etc?? You guys HAVE seen Luna in XP right??? Its 100x worse IMO. Whats that you say? You can turn luna off? Well, you can switch to a different appearance in Zeeter (Berndanese) too.
“Zeeter”! I love that!
That’s exactly how Neil Morris (a Londoner) pronounces the name in his news commentaries on BeOSRadio!
So maybe now we know that Bernd learned his English from somebody on that side of the pond!
Czeslaw
>”Zeeter”!
Actually, I would propose the word “Zetas” (“I am a Zetas”) instead of a Zeeter. You see, Zeta is already a greek letter and word, and in Greece, Zetas is a special police force, a very high-end police force of a sort… 😉
Eugenia
Hello, Eugenia.
Oh, I see! You’re saying that one could call a Zeta user a Zetas…that’s a scary thought! I’m reminded of the Costa-Gavras film “Z” and the infamous colonels of 1968…
But actually nivenh is saying that “Zeeter” is how Bernd Korz pronounces the name of his yellowTab OS!
Czeslaw 🙂
I am actually kind of disappointed. It seems like YT has been spending all their time tweaking the GUI, writing a new installer, making a iTunes rip off, and TimeLiner, instead of writing new drivers.
They seem to be spending to much time on useless little stuff, IMOP… i’d rather see drivers for graphics cards, video capture cards, usb midi interfaces, usb audio capture devices, etc, etc…
But mabye that’s just me.
> It seems like YT has been spending all their time tweaking the GUI, writing a new installer, making a iTunes rip off, and TimeLiner, instead of writing new drivers.
There are more than 25-30 new drivers in Zeta than there are in R5. Things like FireWire and Bluetooth won’t be supported, but better usb, gfx cards, audigy etc, will be supported.
> i’d rather see drivers for graphics cards, video capture cards, usb midi interfaces, usb audio capture devices, etc, etc…
Right. And then what? What are you going to use your PC for? It seems that you just want to make sure that your hardware works, so you can install Zeta, and then just sit back on your chair and stare at it, having nothing to do with it. You seem that you want Zeta to do all that just so you can install it from the geek point of view: as a toy.
But Zeta is not in the toy business. They have to have a balance between supported hardware and available applications. And that’s what they do!
Could things be better? Surely, there is always something better to be done. But given the fact that they are only 4-5 people working on it, not always with knowledge of how to write low-level code and drivers, YTAB does a good all-around job.
Does anyone know if Zeta will include an anti-virus program to assure me that the mascot (Spleeny the mosquito) does not have a virus like West Niles or Malaria?
At the top of the screenshots page it now says “yellowTAB New Generation BeOS Solutions – creating a future for the BeOS!”
IMO that is much better than the last one, because it shows a clear direction for what they are trying to do, and what they can do for their existing/potential customers.
I think they should work on their fonts, possibly asks permission from the B.E.OS team to use their latest techniques, or maybe they can try and create their own method to do the same thing.
http://www.blueeyedos.com/resources/screenshots/font_kerning.png
It would be a definate improvement.
FireWire and Bluetooth won’t be supported
Firewire is supported on stock R5, I’d be suprised if yT removed support in Zeeter 🙂 And I agree that time spent on the GUI and essential apps is more important than obscure drivers. (Hint: Only buy hardware that is (will be) supported.)
BeTunes looks really decent, although I love SoundPlay, its playlist support is primitive. The other new Zeta apps are so/so, dont think I’ll need them.
The GUI is themable, so no praise/critism is necessary. I like spartan interfaces. Either way, I will get the Deluxe edition.
I have to say I agree with the people who say these screenshots are disappointing. I have spent months hyping the future of BeOS to people, and this is a slap in the face in the wrong direction. I don’t care how easy it is to change or customize, the default is what the public perception will be based on.
I looked at those OBOS screenshots months ago, and I was wondering if it is a reality or just a dream. What is the timeframe (and a REAL timeframe) for a working copy of OBOS to be released? Any operating system that works like Be, looks like those OBOS screenshots, and can run basic apps will become my new primary OS!
I pronounce in Greek as “zeeta”.
Zeeter is close enough.
Lets hope BeOS haters don’t start calling it Zeta$$
😉
When I look at this OS, I see a potential target user being people who are using Lycoris Desktop/LX and Lindows. It will work even better for those people if someone creates a windows explorer (fileman) clone for them to feel initially comfortable. They can learn the other tricks later.
Amen to what JLS said, perhaps not as harsh but still, why did they even begin messing with skins in BeOS in the first place? One of the KEY things that I loved about BeOS was the BeOS UI and it’s clean to-the-point sleekness, but now they’re introducing skinning for no reason whatsoever then to make screenshots look attractive.
I think the original BeOS look deserves better, there were hard work and ALOT of though behind each little pixel in there and now that’s all thrown away in favour of skins.
It’s like peeing in the wind cause I know I’m fairly alone in my struggle against all this skin mania for no purpose whatsoever, so let me form this rant into a question instead, will there be a Classic mode? (NOT a skin that looks like classic, real classic mode like Windows) If so, I’d be content and stop bothering you all…
“Right. And then what? What are you going to use your PC for? It seems that you just want to make sure that your hardware works, so you can install Zeta, and then just sit back on your chair and stare at it, having nothing to do with it. “
So please explaine to me how having iTunes; a new installer, and a few new window decors is going to get anything done? If we have hardware support for, say video capture cards, then it would enable people to write video editing software. If we had decent support for pro audio equipment then some one might write a decent audio editor.
But if the only vdeo capture cards we have are cheesy 640×480 tv tuner cards and the only audio cards we have a consumer audio cards then why would anyone spend time and money to write some decent software.
“You seem that you want Zeta to do all that just so you can install it from the geek point of view: as a toy. “
No, I want hardware support so people have a reason to write some software.
“But Zeta is not in the toy business. They have to have a balance between supported hardware and available applications.”
Sorry,but they aren’t going to get no where if they are just another desktop OS. Instead of trying to compete with windoes for general users, mabye they should take one of their best features (media) and find a niche. BeOS was called the media OS remember? That could be a good niche.
No one is going to use BeOS just because it has an iTunes rip off. Someone might use it because it provides a faster, more stable, and more efficent enviroment to work with audio.
>iTunes;
It is a needed app.
> a new installer,
I agree that this was useless, you know that I said that already.
> and a few new window decors
These take no time to do. They are easy to implement, so I guess they do it in their… free time.
>mabye they should take one of their best features (media) and find a niche. BeOS was called the media OS remember?
Sorry, but BeOS was the Media OS only on paper. The Media Kit — despite popular belief– sucks beyond belief. BeOS can’t become a Media OS, it has no support for codecs or video hardware, and a team of 5 people is impossible to deliver something of this magnitude. Even Apple struggles with that, and they have hundreds of developers, money and licensees.
<Quote>
I looked at those OBOS screenshots months ago, and I was wondering if it is a reality or just a dream. What is the timeframe (and a REAL timeframe) for a working copy of OBOS to be released? Any operating system that works like Be, looks like those OBOS screenshots, and can run basic apps will become my new primary OS!
</Quote>
I sympathize with your impatience. I, too, am impatient, but my impatience is directed mostly at my own failure, to date, to teach myself how to program — finally — so that I could actually make a real contribution to the OpenBeOS project and hasten its release…
Czeslaw
Do you think that OBOS and Zeta will be appealing to the same target audience, or different groups? Which ones?
Also, will OBOS eventually have distributions like Linux has (suse, redhat, lycoris, xandros, etc.), or just pretty much one standard open-source OS?
Everyone *DOES* realise that the OBOS Screenshots, while fantastic looking are:
1) Just mockups
2) Mockups for OpenBeOS R2 – or rather the next big version after the initial release.
OpenBeOS is working on R1 at the moment, a COMPLETE clone of BeOS R5. They wont even consider changing the GUI until they decide, ok, this is as identical to R5 as it’s ever going to get, now let’s start making it better.
So basically, you’ve got a LONG wait until you get to see OpenBeOS with that look.
Hello, Three.
I anticipate that there will be different distributions of OpenBeOS ultimately, since several separate parties have already declared their intentions in this regard. (The first to come to mind is BeUnited.org, but there have been others as well.)
The question of target audience is a good one. My impression is that these two OSes will appeal to one single target audience at least initially, namely, BeOS veteran users and lapsed users. Even within this “seed” group, though, there could be a division based on differences regarding the open source issue. Free software proponents would naturally gravitate toward OpenBeOS.
I’m not sure what kind of “market differentiation” we might see between these two OSes with respect to future users, meaning users who are entirely new to the BeOS universe. I do believe that there are plenty of such people in the world, though, who are interested in alternatives to the familiar commercial OSes but find Linux and the BSDs difficult or otherwise unappealing in some way…
Czeslaw
The screenshots look fine to me. I’m not too big into unnecessary eye-candy “skinning” either, but it’s a simple method of making people feel like it’s “their” OS.
I’m waiting on two things before deciding to purchase:
1) A complete list of included software titles and versions
-I don’t want to pay too much for apps that are freely available at BeBits. I’ve read that there are some original entertainment titles to be included. They also advertise that the Home Edition will include a complete office suite – I hope they don’t consider AbiWord an office suite(!).
2) A complete list of supported hardware
-If it were free, I’d tolerate Vesa mode, mono sound, and could do without modem support. No way I’d accept that from a commercial product.
Best Wishes to the YT team!
-Bob
Are those new drivers I keep hearing about written by yellowTab or are they just the drivers you can find on BeBits.com?
I see the GUI to ffmpeg in one of those shots, is that made by YT or can I get that GUI now (couldn’t find it on bebits).
Looks very amateurish imho.. Nothing professional in adding itunes clone or divx encoder on top of an unfinished os.
They should debug the os first and then make a better mozilla port and a good mail client.
Eugenia, itunes is not needed at all. 90% linux users use xmms which is a perfect clone of the winamp 2 ui, and a lot of win users still use winamp2 (or foobar2000:)
I think the obos team is the only true beos believer.
They did not forget the original beos spirit.
Everything supported by BeOS ~should~ still work with Zeta.
Additionally, there are new drivers allegedly being worked on by YellowTab. A couple months ago was a poll asking people to nominate hardware otherwise unsupported by BeOS. YT now has a poll where readers can select which requests will get top priority.
So far GeForce4 is ahead in the poll and hopefully will be YT’s focus.
Best Wishes,
Bob
> Eugenia, itunes is not needed at all. 90% linux users use xmms which is a perfect clone of the winamp 2 ui, and a lot of win users still use winamp2 (or foobar2000:)
Yes, but BeOS/Zeta does not have XMMS. Neither Foobar2000. BeOS is not a Linux if you haven’t noticed. As for SoundPlay, there might be licensed issues and YTAB might not be allowed to include it, so they HAVE to create something to bundle with the OS.
Eugenia
Yep, I was thinking of cl-amp. Plugins, playlists and winamp skins.. they do not HAVE to create another player.
I think I will stick with SoundPlay myself. That is if Zeta comes out with support for DSP24 based multi channel Sound cards like my C-Port by Hoontech. If not then it’s Windows for me.
Its pretty nice, when gonna be ready???
Only two things drivers and development tools.
But no matter what happend, i will buy it, and i will use it.
Making themes does take some time, but not that much. And one reason I do that is because you dont want a driver from me =).
Mat, comon CL-amp is a perfect clone of Winamp2 aswell, so its not a good arguement.
Mat: What good client would you like to have? Have you checked at bebits, tried the latest MDR ( its not looking like much but its really useable ). Mozilla? Hmm, actually I cant see why ppl complain so much about the Bezilla port, I am now using the latest compiled version with Sergeis speed patches, its really great.
/Konrad
The problem with Zeta is that it’s basically R5 with some eye candy, and not a new OS, or even R6. The reason is that there seems, at least none announced, to be no fixes to the major problems in R5 such as:
– file system node monitoring (Tracker update problem)
– mmap() compatibility
– 512MB Ram limit
– better virtual memory performance
– multiuser support in BeFS
– greater POSIX compatibility
These are real issues that make the current BeOS out of date with OSs like Windows, MacOSX and Linux. The only thing BeOS still going for it is the performance of the app_server. I suspect that YT does not have either the source code (too expensive) or the engineers (too expensive) to fix these problems. This is why only OpenBeOS or one of the Linux based clones will ultimately be the real solution, and Zeta will only be a temporary go-between until these other solutions are complete.
The problem with Zeta is that it’s basically R5 with some eye candy, and not a new OS, or even R6. The reason is that there seems, at least none announced, to be no fixes to the major problems in R5 such as:
– file system node monitoring (Tracker update problem)
– mmap() compatibility
– 512MB Ram limit
– better virtual memory performance
– multiuser support in BeFS
– greater POSIX compatibility
These are real issues that make the current BeOS out of date with OSs like Windows, MacOSX and Linux. The only thing BeOS still going for it is the performance of the app_server. I suspect that YT does not have either the source code (too expensive) or the engineers (too expensive) to fix these problems. This is why only OpenBeOS or one of the Linux based clones will ultimately be the real solution, and Zeta will only be a temporary go-between until these other solutions are complete.
Alot of those issues could easily be resolved by Zeta ripping out the guts of BeOS then build up from the FreeBSD 5.2 kernel, the toolkits and GUI. That would be a much better solution than trying to fix an OS that is so broken the cost fixing rather than replacing is rediculously high.
Alot of those issues could easily be resolved by Zeta ripping out the guts of BeOS then build up from the FreeBSD 5.2 kernel, the toolkits and GUI. That would be a much better solution than trying to fix an OS that is so broken the cost fixing rather than replacing is rediculously high.
There is already a good kernel to raplace the BeOS kernel with one day – http://newos.sf.net/ and there’s also an effort going on to make this happend – http://open-beos.sourceforge.net/tms/team.php?id=1
R5 certainly is limited to 512 megs on my machine. Any more, and it won’t boot. I don’t remember the exact explanation but it has to do with the fact that there is a physical limitation (1 Gig, I think), and that video RAM gets added in, and perhaps virtual memory?
Adam
Oh, and if Zeta doesn’t fix this limitation, I have absolutely no inclination to purchase it.
Adam
The BeOS uses virtual kernel space to map things like physical ram and video framebuffer. All ram is mapped here at boot time. This virtual space is 2 gb and allows, afaik, 1 gb of physical ram to be addressed.
According to Michael Phipps from the OBOS team, OBOS might initially support about 3 gb of physical ram.
Although on the same thread (http://www.freelists.org/archives/openbeos/06-2003/msg00013.html) Axel Dörfler proposes a design that allows addressing 2 gb for kernel and additionally 2 gb for userland.
But the damn tabs have to slide! Linux has sliding tabs, but not Zeta? Absurd. I’ll still buy it, though.
Utterly Tasteless
http://www.bedoper.com/bedoper
yT has multiple simultaneous and indepentdent development points / focuses.
#1 The actual OS
#2 Drivers
#3 Important Apps no OS should be without
#4 Helper apps and libraries
#5 Graphical Environment
When the current allotment of tasks has completed (Really Soon Now(tm)), the entire OS will be given to QA and UI engineers for reorganization and cleanup, and bug filtering.
We have hit this stage before actually, but for classified reasons we had to jump back a couple steps to add vital technologies that would allow the system to operate properly on more machines.
Creating an OS is one thing, working on an OS by other people and having to learn all the 50+ different coding styles in place in the existing code, and then managing the dozen or so yellowTAB developers, each with their own style, is very difficult and complex.
Coding standards are in place, of course, but you have to get everyone (volunteers) to abide by them. I for one, do not, and cannot, due to my own embedded programming languages allowing me to write my thought out in a more native tongue.
Well, for now, from an insider, wait to go yellowTAB! Though I really wish y’all would use my newer decors.. you know.. those that say -Final… would probably be a good idea. Either that, or pick a freaking default that is a completed decor… There are a few that come to mine.. only one being from me.. hehe…
–The loon
OH.. and Bernd, you need to set the grey to 225, 225, 225
And the button active border colors should be yellow.
Anyway, I guess I could always write a full decorating system and ignore y’all even more.. hehe
The classic BeOS R5 decor is there, and bit-perfect (or really close).
Our attempts to create a slidy-tab decor have been halted until after R1’s release. We need to focus and get this thing out, make some green, and hopefully hire some more talent.
–The loon
… but I dón’t buy anything for it. I rather see them release something for real now. I am only waiting and waiting…
will yellow tab have same level of hardware suport that linux has ???? im not saying linux has the best known hardware support but it has a goiod selection now, will yellow tab come out with the same level if not greater support ?
Snake
Alot of those issues could easily be resolved by Zeta ripping out the guts of BeOS then build up from the FreeBSD 5.2 kernel, the toolkits and GUI. That would be a much better solution than trying to fix an OS that is so broken the cost fixing rather than replacing is rediculously high.
That is what 3 of the OSBOS projects at beunited.org are doing… FreeBe, Cosmoe, and BlueEyedOS, but using Linux rather than FreeBSD.
linux + freex86 does not boot up nearly as quickly as beos r5. that’s one reason i won’t try those. so far it’s obos and zeta for me.
i’m not horribly impatient. i can wait, so long as it works.
That is what 3 of the OSBOS projects at beunited.org are doing… FreeBe, Cosmoe, and BlueEyedOS, but using Linux rather than FreeBSD.
BeFree uses the FreeBSD kernel…
“will yellow tab have same level of hardware suport that linux has ???? ”
I doubt it. Nearly all modern mainstream hardware has Linux support. The main reason is hardware manufacturers. Most hardware makers release their own Linux drivers, or release enough data that others can produce the drivers.
But Nvidia, for one, is secretive about their hardware specs, thus accepting the responsibility for writing drivers themselves. The trouble is, they do a piss-poor job of supporting alternative operating systems other than major Linux distros.
-Bob
BeFree uses the FreeBSD kernel…
Nope, sorry.. It was sad that the developer has decided to drop the FreeBSD support and chose Linux. 🙁
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/befree/befree/ChangeLog?r…
wouldnt it be possible for the YT or OBOS teams to some how use the linux drivers so they have much more and better hardware support ??
thus allowing more choice of hardware and maybe more users ?
Snake
Though Linux driver sources can be inspirating, the GPL license might make them impossible to port to OBOS / Zeta.
Ie the author of the BeOS 3c509 driver (http://www.augusta.de/~michael/BeOS/3c509/index.us.html) had to experience this…
That’s great!
But, stop teasing me….when can I order it????
the look & the new apps… I am just waiting now to be able to buy it 🙂
-A
..really for an hobby OS it’s state-of-the-art.
Oh wait, you want me to pay for this?!
It seems that managering application gives some clues about the OS development, I see July, August, …
Hey dude, take a sit, it seems we’ll have to wait moorreezzZzzzZZzz…
I remember when everyone way saying that it would be delayed no later than December 2002. I would love to buy they could just get it out the door.
I’m pleased there are some more screenshots coming out showing exactly what Yellowtab have been working on. This is certainly a better effort than merely bundling a large number of fonts.
The only thing that does worry me however is that default window decoration – to me it just seems too messy and in your face? Surely a border that is continued completely ensures the eye is not drawn away from what is important (the window contents) to the rather ugly decoration?
I’m looking forward to Zeta, and I am pleased they are putting so much effort into a re-release of BeOS. I hope they have the drivers etc to enable the community as a whole to experience the new release, and hence provide feedback, bug reports etc.
Having AbiWord running is a plus – by far my favourite word processor! Glad to see the BeOS port has been re-taken up.
Keep up the good work chaps
please end the teasers….
I know you want to keep interest alive, but enought already!
I want to get this OS in my hands and on my computer ASAP so I can start playing around!
just a question
i thought BeOS was opensourced ??
Snake
No, it is not and it will never be, for licensing issues.
That’s not quite right. I seem to recall the yTAB guys saying that they want to slowly replace the OS with parts from (i think) OBOS, replacing the proprietary parts with clean room stuff.
Yeah, but that will take years (OBOS has none of these parts done). So, don’t count on it.
those screen shots are nice. now my question. When are they going to release that thing. I don’t know anything about them or their financing but tick tock tick tock tick tock tock. Every day they don’t sell is a day shorter for their existence if they don’t get enough revenues quickly enough, something you can’t always count on. Tick tock tick tock tick tock tick tock.
Come on guys put that thing out already and make some Green $$$$. You’ve done good work and marketing is another job on its on, and one that can also cost $$$.
this really looks awesome.
i hope the release date is somewhere this year.
i will definitly order it.
I’ll buy it!
Looks all pretty slick.
Go Bernd 😉
I dislike the new look of scroll bar, because it doesn’t even match the rest of UI such as colours and very different style. Hope, they will work on it.
but I would like to try it anyways – mostly for kicks.. but I can’t get over how incredible unprofessional those screenshots look – I certainly hope I can replace the widget and border styles with something that’s usable.
http://yellowtab.com/products/tour.php?id=16
Man, why keeps everyone whining about ‘I don’t like the color of the scrollbar’ and stuff like that???
If you take a look on the yT website, you can read it’s all customizable and the GUI stuff can all be replaced/changed if you want to.
In my opinion, it’s more important how it performs ‘under the hood’. Bundling (extra) apps with the OS is good, but isn’t it about time yT stops porting/developing new apps and finishes the OS itself?
Get the OS out with the apps you got now and work on more/other stuff after that.
Just my .02
The default does matter and it’s very annoying to the eyes when there has very ugly UI, fonts and colours. It’s something that you can’t look (or stare) more than five minutes. The ugly colours and fonts do give me the headaches by unpleasure the eyes and give the more work on the eyes.
Hi there!
Scrollbars and Windows are very freindly to customize. There will atleast be one opensourced theme so you can easy do your own. And please, send us suggestions or screenshots on how you want them to look like.
/Konrad
Just started playing with BeOS R5 PE a few weeks ago. It really does fly. Running on an old P233 Compaq Armada with 32mb Ram, it works faster than Win98 and Debian/Morphix+Gnome.
I’m now really keen to get Zeta on there as the lack of drivers is starting to get annoying. I also want to install it on my main Via EPIA-M system to see how it works on that.
Good work yT people – let’s get a release soon (even if it’s a paid-for preview with an upgrade option when it’s ready!!) – my wallet is purring with anticipation 😉
Would have been nice to have 3 years ago, but today it looks like the horrible deformed neighbours child which has to be hidden in the cellar.
i have no knowledge about this os, i have heard of beos, and not bothered more then that, but the screen shots have made me think twice ??
so what is under the hood ?? unix like os?? is kernel customisable etc….
Snake
imo;
* Looks much better than R5 (i am really tired of r5 look)
* It’s nice to see how much the looks improved since the early screenshots of Zeta.
* Beats the crap out of the queen of ugliness which is called Keramik. (just a ‘modern’ day example, and again imo.)
* The ‘gonx’ window decor should be used together with ‘gonx’ color instead of the beos grey, yet I’d suppose with some hardcoded custom colums (like marko’s classes) grey would still appear and break the consistency, at least in Dano it does that.
So my suggestion would be to leave out the grey if possible, it is too dark. I’d say go for the gonx theme including the color theme (except for widgets, I guess it’s too late for that, still consider it for post-r1)
Hello, Konrad.
Actually, I didn’t think that the widgets and glyphs in the screenshots looked bad at all. But if you want to see some sketches that are really beautiful, check out these from an OBOS artist, especially the ones linked from the bottom part of the page:
http://www.webhost-free.com/beadingo/
Czeslaw
“so what is under the hood ?? unix like os?? is kernel customisable etc….”
BeOS is a completely designed from the ground up microkernel.
It is NOT UNIX, although it does provide POSIX compliant functions.
The Kernel will load up drivers as needed ( dynamic ). Unlike Linux, which needs to have the support “built-in” ( monlithic ).
Hope this helps…
Read here about BeOS and what it is:
http://www.benews.com/beos/“ rel=”nofollow”>http://web.archive.org/web/20010521150816/