Microsoft has announced an integrated suite of tools for designers, as well as a new preview of the company’s ‘Flash killer’ technology, putting Microsoft squarely into competition with Adobe. Microsoft on Dec. 4 announced its Expression Studio suite of tools for designers, consisting of four tools – three of which had been introduced heretofore and a new tool stemming from an acquisition the company made last summer. In addition, Microsoft announced a new CTP of its WPF/E technology, and there’s also an app to show it off, while with some workarounds WPF can be used in Vista’s Sidebar.
Microsoft Unveils Expression Studio Design Tools Suite, ‘Flash Killer’
88 Comments
That should give you an idea about usage total accuracy. 😉
Not many Windows Server systems visit these pages. Must be the same for Linux systems. Aye?
I browse the web with Windows 2003 Server when I’m at work. I use it as my primary OS.
Lots of people with MSDN subscriptions or Technet get it to use and use it for development and testing.
I browse the web with Windows 2003 Server when I’m at work. I use it as my primary OS.
Oh so thats what your company pays you to do. 😉
But seriously, that doesn’t explain why Windows Server would score 0.4%. My guess is that these ranking sites are based on page hits.
I doubt many server admins visit these pointless pages. Similarly, I seriously doubt most GNU/Linux users visit such pages, only to see such a hideous usage ranking.
Lots of people with MSDN subscriptions or Technet get it to use and use it for development and testing
Yes, I talk to some Microsoft MVPs and evangelists on Microsoft developer forums.
I suppose MSDN subscriptions are useful for those who want immediate access to Microsoft’s latest product offerings.
But seriously, that doesn’t explain why Windows Server would score 0.4%.
I’ve seen it as high as .5% on other stat pages. MSDN and Technet are very common. That what Microsoft does well … it gets developer tools and their OS in the hands of developers.
I’m not sure if Expression will be a “Flash Killer”, but developers seem to like it because it integrates with Visual Studio really well.
My guess is that these ranking sites are based on page hits.
Hitslink uses cookies: http://www.hitslink.com/whitepapers/web-log-analyzer-vs-real-time-s…
I doubt many server admins visit these pointless pages.
As I’ve said, many people use Windows 2003 Server as their main desktop. Its a great OS.
I suppose MSDN subscriptions are useful for those who want immediate access to Microsoft’s latest product offerings.
Yes indeed. “Developers, developers, developers”.
Edited 2006-12-05 07:47
But seriously, that doesn’t explain why Windows Server would score 0.4%.
I’ve seen it as high as .5% on other stat pages. MSDN and Technet are very common. That what Microsoft does well … it gets developer tools and their OS in the hands of developers.
True, but not many developers have machine that would run W2003S decently. At least in our country, presence of W2003 is almost non existent. Most of server usage was based on Terminal Server and we all know how it works under W2003S SMB version. This is the reason why W2003S hasn’t take off as it should in here.
Guess some of you just live in some surreal world where fairy tales are real too:)
True, but not many developers have machine that would run W2003S decently.
We have 40 Servers in schools with PIII’s and 384MB or ram in them running Windows 2003 R2. They work just fine.
We have 40 Servers in schools with PIII’s and 384MB or ram in them running Windows 2003 R2. They work just fine.
??? And now you say your Vista desktop is P133/64MB and you win.
Again with the off-topic crap, NotParker?
Repeat after me: web stats are not an accurate measure of market share.
To everyone else: NotParker keeps spamming OSNews with these web stats, claiming they represent an accurate measure of OS market share. He’s been presented counter-arguments but has refused to address them.
He has a history of misrepresenting stats in order to further his exclusively pro-MS agenda. I suggest that you ignore him, as well as mod down his off-topic spamming.
I’ve tried reasoning with him, but he knows only two modes of debate when Linux is concern: insults/personal attacks, and misrepresentation/obfuscation. Logical debate with him appears almost impossible.
/cue personal attacks on me in 3…2…1…
To everyone else: NotParker keeps spamming OSNews with these web stats, claiming they represent an accurate measure of OS market share.
Someone asked where the .4% figure came from. I answered with 4 good references.
They do give people a good idea what people are browsing the web with.
I think its sad you are misrepresenting the type of discussions we’ve had. I always go out of my way to add references.
You are always free to post your own references. But you’d rather attack me without any justification.
So sad.
I’ve had my share of problems with Not “you are pathetic cultists” Parker. But I think .4% is probably a fairly good starting point for usage, at least in the US. Probably Europe is higher than that. I don’t know about you, but I don’t know anyone who uses Linux except other techies like me, and we are not a huge group compared to everyone else. Counting hits on a website isn’t a great technique, but it is at least a starting point. Maybe archisteel can enlighten me as to why he thinks there must be a lot more Linux users – I’d guess around 1% myself.
I also use 2003 on my workstation at work.
Notwithstanding the fact that NotParker very likely cherry-picked the webstat sites to only show the lowest scores for Linux (after all, he’s done that with the Server Growth figures from Gartner), there are many reasons that make webstats an inaccurate tool for establishing market share:
a) Actual web site contents: this one is obvious. Certain web sites will appeal more to certain demographics, where OS distribution may be skewed. Language and local can also skew the results dramatically. In the case of the examples given by NotParker, these certainly overrepresent English-speaking countries.
b) The results are not independently verified and can easily be falsified or even fabricated. “Page hit” counters can also be easily rigged with a few simple scripts.
c) Most Linux users I know use User Agents to masquerade their browser as something else; in the case of Konqueror, the masqueraded browser most often does not mention Linux at all, but rather Windows or some other OS.
d) I think we can all agree that “page hit” counters are *completely* useless to figure out market share, and that the only real way to make web stats more accurate is to use cookies (which not everyone accepts) or record IP addresses. The problem with IP addresses is that they over-represent narrowband (i.e. dial-up) users, because these users routinely obtain a new IP address everytime they login, whereas broadband users usually keep the same IP for long periods of time. Therefore, narrowband users are more likely to be counted more than once, and therefore will be over-represented. This wouldn’t be an issue if narrowband users were evenly distributed among Linux and Windows users, but in fact very few Linux users use modems (for two reasons: they are usually more tech-savvy, and winmodems are notoriously hard to run under Linux).
I do agree that Linux usage is higher in Europe and Asia than it is in the US, however. But that’s besides the point. The point is that, for all the reasons outlined above, it is *clear* that webstats cannot give an accurate figure, and therefore using them to further an anti-Linux (or even a pro-Linux) agenda is nothing more than propaganda.
That’s only part of the problem, of course. The other part is that NotParker brings this up *every* chance he gets, no matter how off-topic it may be (what the heck does Linux market share have to do in an article about Microsoft’s “Flash killer”?)
Notwithstanding the fact that NotParker very likely cherry-picked the webstat sites to only show the lowest scores for Linux (after all, he’s done that with the Server Growth figures from Gartner),
Thats not true and you know it. I think its shameful you have to keep lying like this and then modding me down when you don’t like the references I provide.
I posted growth numbers from both IDC and Gartner for the many quarters to show the direction
I posted FOUR references to very large web analytics firms.
You should stop trying to bully people into believing what you believe in.
Why don’t you post some references for a change. If you think Gartner and IDC are wrong, post some references to other comapines who analyze the market.
Edited 2006-12-05 17:05
Why don’t you post some references for a change.
No need to. As everyone has already noted by now, I’m using the references *you* posted.
If you think Gartner and IDC are wrong, post some references to other comapines who analyze the market.
I don’t think they’re wrong, I simply demonstrated that you willfully misrepresented what the stats mean.
As far as webstats are concerned, I’ve already detailed why these cannot be used to determine market share.
Edited 2006-12-05 19:34
I can confirm these very precise figures. In France, I am the only one using Linux. But, I am happy with it.
No, in this particular instance he got modded down because it’s off-topic (so is this, btw – feel free to mod it down as well).
Usually he gets modded down because he calls those who disagree with him “cultists.”
No, in this particular instance he got modded down because it’s off-topic (so is this, btw – feel free to mod it down as well).
Usually he gets modded down because he calls those who disagree with him “cultists.”
Do you have two accounts? One to mod me down, and one to mod your posts up?
Surely a rude person like you who pretends to be the OSNews police isn’t that popular?
Surely stalking me and modding down all my posts (as well referenced as they are) is rude?
I don’t have two accounts, but it does seem as if someone is modding my posts up as soon as they are posted. Maybe there’s a glitch in the system or something.
I really don’t care, though, what my score is, as long as it’s above 1.00.
As for your posts, well, the fact that they are nearly all off-topic is the reason they get modded down.
They also misrepresent the references they point to, but that in itself is not sufficient reason to mod them down. Being dishonest, in and of itself, is allowed. Being off-topic isn’t.
I note that you didn’t try to deny that you routinely insult those you disagree with by calling them cultists…
Actually, it seems that today I’m part of the 150 most trusted OSNews users (as calculated by the OSNews algorithm), which is why my comments get a +1 bonus. This list is revised every day, apparently, so I won’t necessarily have that bonus in the future.
Note that, personally, I really don’t care if my posts get modded down when they are off-topic (as this one is), so please mod away. You won’t hear me whining about it.
Actually, it seems that today I’m part of the 150 most trusted OSNews users
The other accounts you use to mod yourself up must be happy for you!
I don’t use multiple accounts, NotParker. Get over it.
If you really don’t believe me, write OSNews and ask them to look into it. That’s all I can say.
Surely stalking me and modding down all my posts (as well referenced as they are) is rude?
Is it more rude or less rude than routinely insulting those who disagree with you, as you do?
It can’t save the life of the Flash. The linux market is very little, IMHO if the designers can create better content with WPF/E then with Flash nobody will care with the ~5% of users who are uses linux. And if more web pages will use WPF/E then Flash this 5% will decrease.
I can see only two way (if MS don’t create linux port of FPF/E, but it is not too probable):
1. Better flash then FPW/E with wery cheap development environment.
2. Open source WPF/E clone, based on mono.
IMHO the 1. way is not too lucky: the MS can spend more money to WPF/E then the Adobe to the Flash. And the second way also not sound too good: several patent problems, continuous compatibility problems. But IMHO the second way is the only hope to the desktop linux to survive.
Edited 2006-12-05 06:44
As soon as Adobe ports Photoshop to Linux, the Free Software fanboys will start bitching about it’s license, and half the distros won’t distribute it.
Flash or MS’s alternative appear to me as both plots to bring vendor lock in to the web. Here I am in 64 bit land for example, no source, no choice, no flash. I doubt MS will make that ugly sort of situation go away, whether it will be the same situation but software rather than hardware lock in remains to be seen.
No source, no sale, no clicks, it’s the only way we’ll ever be free. Quit lookin’ at youtube until they start posting mp3’s.
-
2006-12-05 12:52 amspikeb
no official flash. there are, however, two options for x86-64 users: nspluginwrapper, which will allow you to use the official flash linux plugin, or gnash, an open source project.
-
2006-12-05 1:07 amsbenitezb
“no official flash. there are, however, two options for x86-64 users: nspluginwrapper, which will allow you to use the official flash linux plugin, or gnash, an open source project.”
I downloaded Firefox 2 32bits directly from mozilla site and then flash. I installed both into /usr/local and with lib32* worked fine. But still use Konqueror without flash. Don’t need it really.
-
2006-12-06 3:25 amelsewhere
“no official flash. there are, however, two options for x86-64 users: nspluginwrapper, which will allow you to use the official flash linux plugin, or gnash, an open source project.”
I downloaded Firefox 2 32bits directly from mozilla site and then flash. I installed both into /usr/local and with lib32* worked fine. But still use Konqueror without flash. Don’t need it really.
Konq 64-bit will work with 32-bit plugins, since the kde plugin wrapper and browser are exclusive and communicate through dcop. I imagine nsplugwrapper uses a similar method for 64-bit ff.
Flash 9 works perfectly with Konq in Suse 10.2 x86_64, no tweaking or special setup required.
-
2006-12-05 2:12 amchemical_scum
Quit lookin’ at youtube until they start posting mp3’s.
Using the VideoDownloader plugin for Firefox together with Mplayer you can convert .flv videos from YouTube and Myspace to MPEG. Solve your problem ?
I have an nice MPEG copy of the <plug>fabulous Long Blondes latest video “Another Weekend Without Makeup” on Myspace</plug> obtained that way. But I admit I am to lazy to keep on converting the .flv’s I download as Mplayer plays them fine.
what are the requirements like?
im assuming ill need a new pluggin of some kind. Will it work on an old system? on macs? on linux (maybe as part of novell deal)?
Ill put money on it requiring some ‘not quite standard but works in ie’ html code to embed it too
-
2006-12-05 12:18 amMollyC
Quoting from the link I refer to below, “This first CTP runs on both Windows and Macintosh systems (both x86 and PowerPC), and supports IE, FireFox and Safari browsers.”
See this link for lots of info:
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/12/04/announcing-the-re…
And, quoting a post by I.P. Nichols to the borland.public.delphi.non-technical newsgroup:
“Dec 4, 2006:
Today Scott Gurthre’s blog posting announces the availability of the first
CTP of WPF/E along with some details plus links to run four samples.
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/
This is the Microsoft download site and lists versions for both Windows and
Macintosh along with a Sample pak and a development SDK.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/asp.net/bb187358.aspx
From Scott’s blog posting you can click on one of the sample links and if
you don’t have the CTP installed, it will prompt you to install.
I did the installation by choosing the Run File option rather than the Save
File option and the install proceeded smoothly and afterward ran the four
samples on Scott’s blog by clicking on them. “
(I’ve not done anything with this myself. I’m actually more interested in the upcoming version of WPF/E in 2007 that will include a mini-.NET runtime (supposedly 2MB in size) that’ll allow C#, VB and other .NET code to run in a browser like Java applets.)
-
2006-12-05 3:02 amsmitty
There is a subset of features that is supposed to be cross-platform, (WPF-E I think) but some parts of WPF will require windows only features like DirectX.
It will require a plugin for browsers, but it is also going to be used for desktop apps. In that case it is more like a subset of the .NET runtime.
This is going to over big.
Just like their PDF killer and their Google killer and their Dreamweaver killer and their Photoshop killer and their SAP killer and their Oracle Killer and their…. you get the point.
Edited 2006-12-04 23:32
-
2006-12-05 12:29 am
-
2006-12-05 4:30 pmBluenoseJake
Development tools is something that MS does very well, they have kept Java at bay, crushed Borland and annoyed us all with vbscript in IE. I wouldn’t be surprised if they actually make a go of this
I don’t honestly know. On one side I’m happy to see a completely new product from Microsoft, and I’m also happy to see some competition in the design market (which, to tell the truth, has been quite ‘adobized’ lately. If you think about it, Adobe has the 2d/web market while autodesk now owns the 3d market… let’s just hope the 2 companies do not merge.). On the other side I’m really sick of the software giant running in every possible direction to gain new markets and earnings. Let me straightforward: there have been some pretty nice products from Microsoft in the past, just as there’s a lot of unfinished/messed up products lately. But I really don’t want to be negative, and I’ll give the suite a shot even if, in the end, I would really like Microsoft to focus onto something, instead of dispersing energies everywhere.
-
2006-12-05 4:41 pmtryphcycle
“”which, to tell the truth, has been quite ‘adobized’ lately””
beats dealing with Quark….Corel….. Publisher….
i am totally fine with the current state of the “Design Market”! granted…. competition is important… put it is obvious that the so called compitition in the graphic design software market simply was no match for adobe!
It’s gone from Windows anywhere to Microsoft anywhere…
I’m not happy about it but in this case I feel quite sure that Microsoft will have a tough time gaining ground on designers worldwide. After all – since when has Microsoft ever been creative out of the marketing an legal departments?
this website only works with Windows or Mac please klick on buy windows vista link and come back again
Edited 2006-12-05 02:39
I’ve yet to visit a flash site I actually liked that used flash for anything more than fancy mouse-overs, and its best uses are for wrapping movies and having novelty games to play and/or nice web-based chat clients. I also love flashblock.
Do we really want or need a flash competitor? This looks to me almost as a Zune in another market.
Flash and Java certainly have their uses, even beyond ads, but I don’t want to see another fancy plugin unless it really allows for things current tech does not. Vista only or a WPF-something plugin don’t sound good to me. This is especially true when the article describing it uses fluffy language, rather than saying what any of it really is.
Edited 2006-12-05 04:15
-
2006-12-05 10:54 amJon Dough
I’ve yet to visit a flash site I actually liked that used flash for anything more than fancy mouse-overs, and its best uses are for wrapping movies and having novelty games to play and/or nice web-based chat clients. I also love flashblock.
I’d be happy to see flash go. While there are times when flash has its uses, I have it blocked most of the time, along with ads displayed with non-flash technology. I’m even able to block those underlined links that popup ads when you mouseover them.
If advertising on the web were less in-your-face, then I wouldn’t have to resort to blocking it. But since it is so in-your-face, I have no choice but to block it.
-
2006-12-05 3:54 pmandrewg
I don’t like flash either, but http://www.sterkinekor.com is my favourite such site. Much better than Macromedia’s terrible old site.
Just installed the preview on my Quad PowerMac G5 and while its no Flash killer (horrible performance), I can’t help but be impressed. While it will probably never really get anywhere because Flash owns the market, it is pretty cool. Microsoft tends to make some really great products and have some great ideas that never make it outside of the company (and of course some that do) – its too bad their main products don’t follow suit.
But IMHO the second way is the only hope to the desktop linux to survive
What?
Even if WPE/E were to become a Flash killer, it wouldn’t happen overnight. Flash is pretty much standard on most websites today.
Besides this doesn’t prevent Adobe from further improving their Flash products to compete with Expression Studio.
Who knows what Flash Player 10 and Flash MX 2008? might hold in store for us. It may give Microsoft Expression Studio and WPE/E a run for its money.
Edited 2006-12-05 06:55
-
2006-12-05 8:32 amXCoder
>Flash is pretty much standard on most websites today.
DOS was a pertty much standard on most machines in 1985.
>Besides this doesn’t prevent Adobe from further
>improving their Flash products to compete
>with Expression Studio.
But MS have more money. They can give Expression Studio for free if it can grow the acceptance of WPE/E, because the most of their income come from Windows and Office and WPE/E can kill the desktop linux, but if Adobe give the flash development tools for free they can’t realize any income from this product.
-
2006-12-05 9:02 amn4cer
But MS have more money. They can give Expression Studio for free if it can grow the acceptance of WPE/E, because the most of their income come from Windows and Office and WPE/E can kill the desktop linux, but if Adobe give the flash development tools for free they can’t realize any income from this product.
You can be sure Expression will not be given away for free. Maybe in the future they will add to or create new Express-styled tools specifically for light WPF/E development, but for now, pricing is below (from the press release):
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/dec06/12-04MSExpressi…
Microsoft also unveiled final product pricing and availability for the complete Expression product family. Expression Web is available for an estimated retail price (ERP) of $299 (U.S.), and qualifying users of FrontPage® can upgrade to Expression Web for $99 ERP. Shipping in the second quarter of 2007, Expression Blend will be available for $499 ERP, Expression Media for $299 ERP, and the full Expression Studio for $599 ERP. When it ships, Expression Studio will also be available as a $349 ERP upgrade to users who have purchased Expression Web and other qualifying Microsoft products. Full product pricing and availability information is available on the http://www.microsoft.com/expression. All Expression products for English-speaking markets will include getting-started video training courtesy of Total Training Inc. Comprehensive video training will be available for purchase separately at http://www.totaltraining.com/expression.
Edited 2006-12-05 09:03
-
2006-12-05 10:30 amXCoder
I wasn’t speak that they will give it for free, but they can give it, if the spread of WPF/E is not fast enought. In this case they can put money to this development from Vista or any other resource, because the income from the Expression is a lot less then the income from Windows, and the WPF/E will provide the long term dominance of the microsoft platforms. Let see the Visual Studio Express editations…
Microsoft feels indeed very threatened now (only paranoid survive said somebody) and launches an overall effort to squeeze any other company with multi-platform tools. It’s indeed a very determined strategy.
War on formats is raging again.
Clearly Adobe is a choice target: pdf, flash are such tools.
DirectX 10, readable on Vista only is an extreme try to get rid of OpenGL increasing capabilities.
ODF on the other hand was a near-miss and Microsoft switched to a damage-control mode on this one.
The only field he cannot currently compete is virtualization and look how it “protect” its Vista customers.
I do hope they fail but…
-
2006-12-05 7:56 amNotParker
Microsoft feels indeed very threatened now (only paranoid survive said somebody) and launches an overall effort to squeeze any other company with multi-platform tools.
Microsoft is competing in the market place. They have an obligation to their shareholders.
Expression Studio is a logical addition to their development tools.
Clearly Adobe is a choice target: pdf, flash are such tools.
DirectX 10, readable on Vista only is an extreme try to get rid of OpenGL increasing capabilities.
I for one am tired of the 100MB + bloat of Adobe Reader and look forward to an alternative. I hope XPS is that alternative.
DirectX 10 is designed to interest game developers to keep using Windows as a platform for great games. Isn’t that what they should be doing?
Edited 2006-12-05 08:00
-
2006-12-05 11:11 amsomebody
I for one am tired of the 100MB + bloat of Adobe Reader and look forward to an alternative. I hope XPS is that alternative.
And another brilliant remark from NotParker.
1. Adobe Reader is 37MB (Linux version, I don’t care about Windows so I wouldn’t know)
2. He hopes that non-portable format (that is how MS would want it) controlled by MS will replace something that can already be read in all OSes. XPS will be present on which OSes? With that imagine that crossplatform means every god damn OS.
Now my take on PDF reader:) I don’t have Adobe reader and I read them just fine. Cairo, poppler and evince do job well for me (face it, most of the users don’t need advanced PDF functions). That is less than 2MB and already included in every distro. Same goes on OSX. OSX replaced PS drawing system from previous OS with PDF drawing system. Again 1-2 MB.
Why doesn’t MS incorporate small PDF reader in their OS like others do? Wouldn’t that make you happy just as much?
-
2006-12-05 12:01 pmRayz
XPS will be present on which OSes? With that imagine that crossplatform means every god damn OS.
Well, since anyone is free to implement an XPS reader (the spec is openly published and royalty-free), then that really depends on the god damn platform programmers I guess.
-
2006-12-05 12:08 pmXCoder
My first hard disc was 10MB, and it was enought for DOS, Clipper, Turbo C++ and 3-4 small game. IMHO 37MB is a little bit big for a simple document reader.
-
2006-12-05 12:23 pm
-
2006-12-05 4:01 pmHavin_it
I just checked the Acrobat 7.0 dir in my Windows partition and Konq tells me it’s 126.5MB. And I imagine there is a bit more in Common Files, system32 etc.
Is this really too big in today’s environment? The answer will be very personal, TBH. It’ll be 0.1% or less on most disks sold today, even on laptops, but okay, there are still plenty of space-challenged folks around.
Load-time can be brought down hugely by using one of the free speedup progs floating around (that disable the splash screen, advert/Yahoo sh*t, and various plugins you’ll never need).
Adobe could easily reduce the installed size of the Reader, I think. From using the PDF-speedup app I’ve already seen that it copes quite gracefully with missing plugins (politely informs you that “I can’t do that Dave” and just does what it can), so they could simply give you the choice at install-time. They already have the wacky download-manager component in the installer, why not do a pre-download checklist of what plugins you actually *want*, and only download those? Sure would make the dialup folks’ lives a lot easier…
-
2006-12-05 1:06 pmREM2000
yes Adobe Reader has become bloated, it takes ages to load on windows, eats memory for a glorified advertisement for Adobe Acrobat.
I agree that it would be nice if Microsoft were to do what apple has done an implement a quick little PDF API, with quick viewers and creators.
However Microsoft already tried to do this, they tried to implement PDF into Office 2007 but they were refused and monopoly was mentioned again. Im sure if Microsoft was allowed to do it with office they would have done it with Windows.
Although i would hope that the controls over PDF in Windows and office would be tight, as i wouldn’t want another sun/microsoft java VM PITA to happen.
As for XPS, im glad to see someone else have a crack at the market, competition is good, perhaps it will give Adobe a kick up the behind and get them innovating.
-
2006-12-05 11:09 pmsomebody
However Microsoft already tried to do this, they tried to implement PDF into Office 2007 but they were refused and monopoly was mentioned again. Im sure if Microsoft was allowed to do it with office they would have done it with Windows.
Problem was writing, not reading.
-
2006-12-05 4:58 pmNotParker
another brilliant remark from NotParker.
1. Adobe Reader is 37MB (Linux version, I don’t care about Windows so I wouldn’t know)
No. You don’t know.
Right click on the Adobe folder in a Windows XP install:
96.8 MB (101,556,479 bytes) on disk.
Acrobat Reader is bloatware.
2. He hopes that non-portable format (that is how MS would want it) controlled by MS will replace something that can already be read in all OSes. XPS will be present on which OSes? With that imagine that crossplatform means every god damn OS.
No need to be rude.
I hope XPS is better and more lightweight than the 100MB Adobe Acrobat. Just because you hate Microsoft doesn’t mean I can’t wish for an advance.
-
2006-12-05 11:05 pmsomebody
I hope XPS is better and more lightweight than the 100MB Adobe Acrobat
???
How could graphic format be more lightweight than piece of software. Or better, how can you compare. I guess, printing the spec book of XPS, printing source of Acrobat and measuring which has more pages?
As I said, there is zillion PDF readers, some very lightweight, just pick your poison.
Just because you hate Microsoft doesn’t mean I can’t wish for an advance.
I don’t hate MS, I just don’t support their way. Read my comments. There is a lot of difference between me and you. I’m not biased, and whenever I am, I specify that without any shame on my soul. You on the other hand are more or less zealoting against linux only.
Now second question, how could you advance by replacing PORTABLE Document Format with smething not portable (license is not porting friendly)? As soon as you would try to replace it, you’d cross against the only reason why PDF is important the way it is, portability.
I don’t say XPS is not better than PDF (maybe yes, maybe not. I don’t know enough about XPS. But please don’t send me link for MS video about it. It was full of enormous mistakes like their bad printing quality of PS demonstration, anyone with basic PS knowledge can simulate it in 2 seconds), it just isn’t portable yet (nd not possible to be either). So, yes. Basing that you use Windows only, you might even advance with XPS (or not), but in the end of the day your ass is not horizon.
-
2006-12-06 1:12 amNotParker
How could graphic format be more lightweight than piece of software.
The XPS tools for generating and reading XPS documents are built into Vista. For Xp I’m not sure how big the .NET 3.0 framework + XPS tools is. Probably less than the 100+ MB for Acrobat Reader.
But even if they are the same, that does include document generation capabilities.
it just isn’t portable yet (nd not possible to be either).
It will work on 85-90% of PC’s right now.
-
2006-12-06 1:50 amXaero_Vincent
The XPS tools for generating and reading XPS documents are built into Vista. For Xp I’m not sure how big the .NET 3.0 framework + XPS tools is. Probably less than the 100+ MB for Acrobat
Try Evince. ~4 MB installed size.
It will work on 85-90% of PC’s right now.
Completely unacceptable. It must run on at least 99.9999% (give or take) of computers used today.
-
2006-12-06 3:56 amNotParker
Completely unacceptable. It must run on at least 99.9999% (give or take) of computers used today.
95% will do. And that what XP and Vista will have by the end of 2007.
-
2006-12-06 5:29 amarchiesteel
You seem actually *happy* that MS would have an OS monopoly, and you expect us to believe that you *don’t* work for MS?
BTW, it is a virtual impossibility that XP and Vista would have 95% of computers used by the end of 2007. That’s just not going to happen, any way you cut it.
-
2006-12-06 1:54 amsomebody
The XPS tools for generating and reading XPS documents are built into Vista. For Xp I’m not sure how big the .NET 3.0 framework + XPS tools is. Probably less than the 100+ MB for Acrobat Reader.
Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package = 50.33MB
Other you might need I don’t know.
But even if they are the same, that does include document generation capabilities.
PDFCreator = 12.3MB (that is including ghostscript, without is even smaller)
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=57796&package…
Free eXpert PDF reader = 7.38MB (includes tagging and simple editing)
http://www.visagesoft.com/products/pdfreader/
You can find even more lightweight readers
If you don’t like Adobe Reader, pick another poison. Google is your friend.
It will work on 85-90% of PC’s right now.
And others? PDF works everywhere and works now. You probably just say screw them. I can’t, even though I use Linux only my software has to run everywhere (btw. This is not conditioned with my business, my Windows revenue would account for less than 10% and even that is not from my software. It is my wishful thinking, that software is supposed to run anywhere).
Edited 2006-12-06 02:00
-
2006-12-06 3:59 amNotParker
You can find even more lightweight readers
I’ve tried them. They don’t work well. Adobe keeps extending its format meaning free readers never quite render documents that well.
And others? PDF works everywhere and works now.
As I’ve said, Adobe is bloatware and has a lot of security issues that a reader shouldn’t have.
XPS is an ECMA standard (or will be). PDF isn’t.
And XPS is installed with Vista. No downloads necessary.
-
2006-12-06 5:33 amarchiesteel
You’ll still need a PDF reader to access the vast majority of PDF documents out there. People are not just going to switch to XPS because it’s in Vista, you know?
PDF can be read by all desktop PCs. Why would people switch to something that only a few PCs will have?
Be careful of inertia: it has served your favorite monopolist in the past, but in this case it’s going to play against it.
-
2006-12-06 6:43 amXCoder
IMHO in the near future everybody will create XPS reader for every platform. And you can read XPS in linux, macos, etc. The bigger problem will the WPF/E. If the developers can create better content with lesser working hours, then will prefer WPF/E instead of Flash, because the 95% of users uses windows and who care with the remain 5% (don’t forget: WPF/E also works on MacOS – only the linux and the old windows versions (win2k, win9x) can’t see WPF/E based contents. In this case the most of desktop users will change their desktop OS from linux or win9x or win2k to vista, because they can’t browse the internet with linux or win2k desktop. And IMHO this technology also will kill linux on the server side: far easier create WPF/E application with the integrated windows development environments (Visual Studio/.NET, Expression tools, etc) then notepad+PHP+MySQL or Java.
-
2006-12-06 2:53 pmarchiesteel
But why would people stop using Flash to use WPF in the first place? As I’ve said, inertia is a powerful force. You have plenty of artists/designers who already know Flash, they’ve put a lot of time into learning Flash, buying Flash authoring software, etc.
Why would people go for something that works on 90-95% of PCs (less if you go international, as there are a *lot* of Win98+Win2K PCs left outside the U.S.) when they can get something that works on 100% of PCs?
Don’t forget that Microsoft has not been capable of imposing new formats/technologies in a while. It’s unveiled many “killers” over the past few years (the most recent being the Zune, aka the “iPod killer”), but none of them have hit the mark.
PDFs and Flash are here to stay, guys. In any case, by the time they gain any market share at all, someone will have ported them over to Linux.
You guys also have to realize that purposefully trying to shut out a competitor by using Vista to impose a new standard would set up MS to be the target of a new anti-trust lawsuit (and ont that would possibly be much more devastating, considering the new Democratic congress).
I.e. you guys’ dreams of total domination by Microsoft would spell doom for the company, as the DOJ and EU would come down on them and either split the company or force it to truly open the specs of its technologies for everyone to implement freely.
-
2006-12-06 1:08 pmsomebody
I’ve tried them. They don’t work well. Adobe keeps extending its format meaning free readers never quite render documents that well.
Funny, never used Adobe Reader, never had any problems.
And I have quite a few pretty advanced PDF needs. Which would include parsing and processing them on server side from my services.
XPS is an ECMA standard (or will be). PDF isn’t.
PDF is document standard in EU (and more or less elsewhere too). XPS isn’t. PDF covers 99.999%, XPS won’t achieve that ever.
Who cares about ECMA.
And XPS is installed with Vista. No downloads necessary.
Meaning 0.11% can read XPS now. You win.
At least don’t talk out of your ass and please stop zealoting with your own personal opinions. I’m a linux user, but I never consider one over another OS as public opinion. Personally, I know what I need and what I want (it ain’t Windows that’s for sure). Public? Who am I to speak what people need. Everybody has its own hammer for his nails and I leave people to decide on their poison.
One thing is bashing where truth really hurts (there are a lot of topics on every OS like that). Other is doing what you do. Constantly making stupid, biased and non-related remarks which always take off out of your ass. And thinking that you always proclaim how you bash zealots? Well, it takes one to…
-
2006-12-06 5:40 pmNotParker
At least don’t talk out of your ass and please stop zealoting with your own personal opinions.
Ooops. I forgot. Opinions not sanction by the cult are disallowed.
[i]Who cares about ECMA.[/]
Nobody really. The cult insists on open standards, but they don’t care at all about open standards if non-open proprietary document formats benefit a Microsoft competitor.
The cult are hypocrites.
-
2006-12-06 6:36 pmsomebody
At least don’t talk out of your ass and please stop zealoting with your own personal opinions.
Ooops. I forgot. Opinions not sanction by the cult are disallowed.
Maybe you shouldn’t cut one sentence out of whole. It distorts what I said and you just gave another stupid remark on your account.
Let me be clear and tactful as possible (if I wasn’t).
If one is stating personal opinion? It is OK (I even respect those who state it, no matter what their preference. Go over my commens and look how many times I defend MS for example). But you don’t do that. You state your personal opinion as it would be the only truth ruling this world. In your comments your ass is worlds brain.
Stating comments like you do brings the worst out of people. Even those who usually tend to make smart remarks enter into their defensive mode because of them. Nobody likes someone to step on their baby, Imagine someone shitting over MS based articles like you do on linux. Not pleasant.
To be even more clear. Just be specific what is personal and what is global. Let me give you example of your usual comments.
– Linux sucks, etc are simply non founded comments (same goes for Windows sucks).
– Exchange is the best? It might even be for you. A lot of people would disagree, their needs probably differ from yours (and every nail has its own best hammer). I for one can’t afford Exchange because I have too large needs. And having one computer with Qmail packed with features (if you don’t know my needs or you don’t know what everything is possible, your comment is not needed) instead of needing cluster of Exchange computers is a big benefit as well for me as my customers (simply too much money goes to MS, I can even decently charge for my work. Hey I’m human, I like earning money, and selling linux solutions means 80-90% more earnings than selling windows ones for me). This is why MS products are loss when I consider wheter to use them or not. Simply too much money goes to MS (and customer is always limited in that department) and fact that all solutions are closed.
– Linux users are cultists? This just makes you MS brainwashed cultist, nothing else.
– Linux users are zealots? If not, they became that after your unfounded and biased global attacks.
Who cares about ECMA.[/]
Nobody really. The cult insists on open standards, but they don’t care at all about open standards if non-open proprietary document formats benefit a Microsoft competitor.
The cult are hypocrites.
Not really. PDF was always exception, known for its closed features. PDF was used because it runs on 99.999% of computers, is already ported to most platforms and because is already used widely.
None of these reasons could be said about XPS. MS won’t port it to other OSes (no, OSX is not enough, there is a wide variety of other OSes in the wild). And even if you say “then port it to linux your self”, this would mean another backstep for other platforms. It is time and resource consuming hot water reinvention. Why when PDF already exists?
Beside the point. where did I ever state the fact that PDF is open standard?
p.s. Some of us like to read articles and what people have to say about it. And if you ask me, you tend to make my enjoyment almost a pain whenever linux article is question. As soon as you attack or even post, otherwise maybe even enjoyable topic becomes a flamewar. I don’t know what linux or people using it did to you, but I doubt that you would be harmed from people on News sites. And most read news for the same reasons I do. Yes, this is my personal opinion. Even moding down doesn’t help, your comments are moded down but there is always lot of non moded flamewar parts from others. If linux is not your thing, please avoid it.
[sarcasm] thanks for taking my little joys [/sarcasm]
-
2006-12-06 8:00 pmNotParker
But you don’t do that. You state your personal opinion as it would be the only truth ruling this world. In your comments your ass is worlds brain.
I think you dislike what I say because I don’t kiss the *ss of the cult.
And I think the cult are hypocrites because they want open standards but they are willing to make exceptions if they think it annoys Microsoft. The fact that PDF is copyrighted and patented by Adobe doesn’t bother them if they perceive Adobe as the enemy of Microsoft.
-
2006-12-06 10:06 pmsomebody
I think you dislike what I say because I don’t kiss the *ss of the cult
Guess my hope you can be reasoned with is hopeless *sigh*
What is the cult?
Should I be a part of some cult? Or am I already in your opinion?
And I think the cult are hypocrites because they want open standards but they are willing to make exceptions if they think it annoys Microsoft. The fact that PDF is copyrighted and patented by Adobe doesn’t bother them if they perceive Adobe as the enemy of Microsoft.
No, it isn’t that. XPS as standard would mean other OSes couldn’t read standard. What kind of standard would that be? Even minority are people deserving the right to read standards, don’t you agree?
Again my question. When have I said that being non-MS tech is the reason for PDF? I said the reason is, PDF covers all OSes and covers them now. MS has no plans like that.
Why do you keep off-topic and don’t answer any real question? Now I’m starting to think you really lack brains. Cutting out one sentence and answering on it like that would be whole basis for my comment. Please do take it as whole, or simply don’t answer because I’m only starting to think you’re stupid and simply lack brains (you just waste my time and your IQ in my eyes nears your OSNews_average*100).
p.s. You seem to fit your beloved word very well. Posting some link and adding FUD is just that.
[from dictionary]
“Hypocrite | Hyp”o*crite |
n. F., fr. L. hypocrita, Gr. ? one who
plays a part on the stage, a dissembler, feigner. See
Hypocrisy.
One who plays a part; especially, one who, for the purpose of winning approbation of favor, puts on a fair outside seeming;
one who feigns to be other and better than he is; a false pretender to virtue or piety; one who simulates virtue or piety.”
I’m anoyed with your comments too. But I don’t fit your group (based on your description you seem to think you annoy only zealots, no you don’t, you annoy everybody).
I’m anoyed because your comments act like there is no minority and nobody should care about them.
I’m anoyed because you’re too pushy.
I’m annoyed because you act like you know how people should think and what they need
In fact, I’m starting to get anoyed whenever you post to linux article. You never post one true thing without a FUD spin.
Please, do answer me these next questions, I’m really interested in your answer.
Did I do something to you?
Did most of the readers (some might be anoying, but I don’t consider this as a reason to shit over everybody or provoking them)?
Did linux do something to you (did maybe sneak him self your machine during the night while formatting the windows partition)?
Would it hurt to leave linux topics and post about what you know and like (it is obvious that you know about linux almost zero, what you learn from MS FUD machine would be your knowledge about it)?
p.p.s. If I try to think with your brain, this is what I get…
I think that I should get my self another account and start doing to Windows articles like you are doing to linux. It seems fun from your standpoint. Hell, most of the linux users here should do that. I think it will be a real fun reading Windows articles afterwards.
-
2006-12-06 11:12 pmNotParker
No, it isn’t that. XPS as standard would mean other OSes couldn’t read standard.
SInce XPS is an ECMA standard, all operating systems could impliment it if they choose to do.
It appears you think they won’t because they want Microsoft to fail.
I see no technical reasons for your dislike of XPS. All I see is hatred of Microsoft.
-
2006-12-07 12:07 amstestagg
I see no technical reasons for your dislike of XPS
I do. It’s called abuse of market dominance. Adobe have a perfectly good system out there, why push an alternative on us? Oh yeah.. I remember, the Adobe offensive has begun.
-
2006-12-07 2:24 amsomebody
Can you please copy/paste where did I said anything of this?
SInce XPS is an ECMA standard, all operating systems could impliment it if they choose to do.
Either you’re stupid or you can’t read, I never said that they can’t.
But let me indulge you… Yes, they could. As I already said, I never disputed that fact. I only said that imposing new system for something that already exists as satisfactory would mean waste of time and resources.
And since MS won’t make XPS available for others, while Adobe did, I consider Adobe better choice. (beside the fact that almost every OS already has PDF implemented)
For example, implementing XPS in linux would just mean another non-100% standard like .doc for example. People are using OO.o with .doc as default and then they ask how it doesn’t work 100%. XPS is better to be left alone where it is. You and alike are nicest example for that, people always bash how OO.o is not 100% MSOffice compatible beside the fact that XPS would be always coming too late to the party. So, why bother? Just to give you and alike another excuse? Waste of time if you ask me.
It appears you think they won’t because they want Microsoft to fail.
??? Can you even read?
Where did I even slightly mention this? Answer is the same as it was before, waste of time and resources.
It is better they don’t. The only thing it will bring is bad publicity from the likes of you, because it will be missing XYZ functionality.
I see no technical reasons for your dislike of XPS. All I see is hatred of Microsoft.
??? No, I guess you can’t read.
Where did I even slightly said I dislike XPS (other than disliking duplication of already existing feature)
I said 2 things about XPS (read my previous comments)
1. It might even be better than PDF as far as I know
2. Don’t know enough about XPS to judge which one is better, PDF or XPS
And where the hell did I impose hatred over MS?
with all the features they had to cut from vista and everything you would think they would try to just make the products theya re know for as good as they can instead of trying to spread themselves so thin they cant even get there flagships out feature complete and on time….
I’m so bored of Microsoft’s X product “killers”. Somebody should tell them that they just can’t compete with everyone. If you don’t see Adobe making OSses is for a reason.
Here’s my perspective:
– Dreamweaver, Flash, Photoshop and Illustrator have market dominance and they became standards in the professional industry.
– Adobe has a huge list of related 3rd party hardware and software, that work closely with Adobe apps.
– Adobe, unlike Microsoft, gives you reasons to upgrade to every new version they launch, unlike Microsoft and its apps. And we’re talking about a company that dominates the high-end graphic software segment (just like Microsoft dominates the OS and office segment). So if they are going to have competition, they’re probably going to push the bar even higher.
– The only way I see the Expression suite to conquer market is by having a lower price (even lower then Corel Suite…) – and still postion itself as high-end like Adobe.
– Regarding Linux, Adobe is probably waiting for the Linux Desktop to become attractive enough acording to their requisites. This means that it wants more hardware support, more integration for its products, more standards compliance between distributions.
Finally, I personally believe in the possibility of Linux becoming a big force in the OS space. But I know and maybe you know that OS features isn’t enough to push it (look at Mac OS, even considering it has hardware lock-down).
I’m an Industrial Designer and mainly use Linux, including for graphic work, and you can actually have very decent work on it. I only use Windows because Alibre Xpress only works on it and because there aren’t any other decent free parametric 3D sofware (like Solidworks and Pro/E – this one is available to Linux for $5000…) for Linux.
By the way, is there any programmer here interested in starting an open-source project for a parametric 3D application?
Thanks!
Edited 2006-12-05 16:46
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2067319,00.asp?kc=EWEWEMNL1204…
“However, eWEEK Labs’ tests show that Expression Web is much more than that: While we always looked at FrontPage as a fairly basic Web editing tool that fell short when it came to serious Web development, Expression Web has taken a big leap in functionality and capability—to the point where it is a serious competitor to the leader in Web authoring, Adobe’s Dreamweaver.”
“Some of Expression Web’s features are even better than those in rivals such as Dreamweaver, including the best CSS (Cascading Style Sheet) browsing tools that we’ve seen in a Web editing tool. The CSS tools, for example, made it very simple to browse through our styles and actually see what each style looked like before applying it.”
It’s time or port your flash apps to Linux before MS crushes you, while you at it, we’ll have Photoshop as well.
Huh? MS doesn’t have a presence under Linux, either, so how is porting flash apps to Linux going to help?
Because it’s something MS cannot do, if adobe flash was killed by MS “killer” app then Adobe would have the Linux market. Xara/Corel ring any bells?
Adobe would have the Linux market
Adobe doesn’t want or need a market comprising less than 2% of all desktop PCs.
Adobe doesn’t want or need a market comprising less than 2% of all desktop PCs.
…and yet they want the Apple market?
Gee, I guess Adobe really doesn’t care about Linux, which is why they updated their Acrobat Reader, and why they’ll be releasing Flash 9 for Linux at the same time as Windows…
…and yet they want the Apple market?
I should have been more clear in my previous posts. Adobe is driven primarily by the platform demographics of customers who buy its tools. It’s in the odd position of having its content consumed primarily on Windows platforms but having a significant percentage of its developer community use Macs to produce it; thus, Adobe has made significant investments in the Mac to support its tools business. But Linux simply doesn’t contribute a meaningful amount of business to Adobe at present and, as such, Adobe’s investments in Linux are minimal.
Yeah, and the 0.4% of Linux market will help Adobe, get real.
Where is this .4% nonsense coming from? The last numbers I saw had linux somewhere between 3 and 5%.
Where is this .4% nonsense coming from? The last numbers I saw had linux somewhere between 3 and 5%.
.37% – http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=2
.36% – http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox46-operating-systems-ma…
0% (probably .3% rounded down) – http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2006/November/os.php
.4% – http://www.webhits.de/webhits/browser.htm