A Microsoft patch meant to fix critical security flaws in Windows 2000, Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 is causing trouble for some users, the company said Friday.
Critical Windows Patch May Wreak PC Havoc
About The Author
Eugenia Loli
Ex-programmer, ex-editor in chief at OSNews.com, now a visual artist/filmmaker.
Follow me on Twitter @EugeniaLoli
65 Comments
-
2005-10-15 11:50 am
Just because Apple is switching to a different processor means what exactly? That Apple’s operating systems will become as vulnerable because the run on Intel? What?
And the term WinTel is need more now then before because Apple is moving over to x86 and when people start asking questions it will be easier to define one from the other with less tech speak.
WinTel MacTel…see, easy.
Troll? It’s not like I’m wrong or anything! WIndows is a huge pile of sh*te. If it was Apple that had something like PATCH TUESDAY!! Wake up! Would you have any doubt in your mind that it’s time to try something different. How about you think alternatively here!?! Apple or linux or Apple, whatever just leave that pile of stinking trash that is Windows where it belongs. Maybe Vista will be different maybe it wont.
We’re talking about a company that has admitted that after twenty years of coding, that their latest OS is broken and needed to start over again lol…THEY HAVE LEARNED NOTHING! Switch it all around and put Apple where MS is and tell me you wouldn’t be saying the same exact thing! Yeah I’m a troll. Pfft, whatever.
-
2005-10-16 1:39 pmAnonymous
And the term WinTel is need more now then before because Apple is moving over to x86 and when people start asking questions it will be easier to define one from the other with less tech speak.
WinTel MacTel…see, easy.
Why is that easier than just saying Windows or Mac?
Not to mention that Windows doesn’t only run on Intel and in most cases it isn’t relevent whether it is an Intel, AMD, whatever CPU, which makes the terms WinTel and MacTel more confusing to the tech illiterate.
Yeah, right a few weeks. For all users. Huh.
It’s funny that you’re link isn’t active but mine is…wonder why.
Everyone! You are talking about certain users.
http://macslash.org/comments.pl?sid=5285&op=&threshold=0&commentsor…
And even tho in the story below they write that it affected some, NOT ALL, but SOME. They still try and make it seem like it affected the entire Mac community. Never mind what I said. Stay with Windows, you deserve each other. Bye. lol
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5675631.html
A minor update to Mac OS X is causing headaches for some computer owners, who find their systems no longer work properly when using Java-based applications or visiting certain Web sites.
It’s funny that you’re link isn’t active but mine is…wonder why.
Because the [/i] collided with the web address. What, a server bug now means that my link to apple, copied from your post, means only your opinion is right.
er…
“The trouble appears to occur only when default permission settings on a Windows directory have been changed, according to Microsoft.”
Two things:
1-How does these default permissions get changed?
2-Who the $%!@#$ designs such a fragile system?
-
2005-10-15 4:17 pmAnonymous
>>Two things:
>>1-How does these default permissions get changed?
because somebody changed them
>>2-Who the $%!@#$ designs such a fragile system?
chmod -R 0000 /
and every user (except root) will have trouble to log in
-
2005-10-15 1:57 pmAnonymous
Do it right. I t should be:
” WINDOWS IS GAY
JUST!111! OMG WTF LOL LIEK BSD
L3T11!11!! OMG LOL HET3ROTUX R3IGN!!!! OMG LOL”
http://ssshotaru.homestead.com/files/aolertranslator.html
This is simply a brilliant marketing move by Microsoft.
1. Keep the core code base of poor quality
2. Finally acknowledge the basic architecture cannot be locked down
3. Release patches which do more damage than good.
Then, make a FORTUNE selling security software for your own insecure products.
I’m not MS hater…life’s too short. And I am not the type of guy who gets passionate about my choice of Operating System. It’s just my choice.
But man alive, am I certainly happy I left the Windows words in 2002, and never looked back.
Linux patch or new kernel release never breaks anything.
A) True.
B) Very true.
C) Never ever, Open Source inherently does not have bugs.
D) Microsoft must die.
-
2005-10-15 3:26 pmma_d
I don’t think I’ve heard of this big a break on a kernel that wasn’t marked mm (the test kernels). The worst I’ve ever had, on an mm kernel, was that it randomly sucked up CPU cycles… Didn’t slow me down from rebooting and selecting an older kernel .
Of course, I now upgrade kernels all of about every YEAR so I’m not too worried .
I don’t think this is that big a deal. People will have to click 8 spots and reboot (oh noes, the poor morons!). But it is a lesson for Microsoft: Increase your number of test machines and play with permissions on them…
-
2005-10-15 3:40 pmjayc
Linux patch or new kernel release never breaks anything.
A) True.
B) Very true.
C) Never ever, Open Source inherently does not have bugs.
D) Microsoft must die.
A. Security updates in Debian and Ubuntu are backported so as not to cause anything to break. They can do this with several thousand packages. Microsoft can’t fix one and make sure things don’t break. My gut says this is because in *nix programs are more cleanly separated whereas in Windows they’re all mushed together and thus more fragile.
-
2005-10-15 8:01 pmAnonymous
>A. Security updates in Debian and Ubuntu are backported so as not to cause anything to break.
Except some drivers- but it is driver writer fault.
>They can do this with several thousand packages. Microsoft can’t fix one and make sure things don’t break.
Have you even read advisory to comprehend what was broken and why?
Has nothing to do with hundreds of thousands software titles- they still run.
The fix is simple, too. In UNIX terms: do chmod and it is fixed.
>My gut says this is because in *nix programs are more cleanly separated whereas in Windows they’re all mushed together and thus more fragile.
(start of sarcasm)
Yes, FireFox (Windows program) is mushed together with Opera, Internet Explorer, AIM and Windows kernel.
OpenOffice on Windows is much more fragile than on Linux.
ftp client in Ubuntu is inherently more stable that ftp client in Windows.
(end of sarcasm)
Tell your gut to shut up.
“Here you go my foolish friends. Salvation.
I have laptop with XP. For networking, I have set up bleutooth phone as a modem (EVDO). Can you do this with OS X? No. So your “salvation” is worthless.
-
2005-10-15 6:52 pm
-
2005-10-15 9:25 pmAnonymous
“”Here you go my foolish friends. Salvation.
I have laptop with XP. For networking, I have set up bleutooth phone as a modem (EVDO). Can you do this with OS X? No. So your “salvation” is worthless.”
“Yes. Do a little research before you post.”
No, if you ever used bluetooth mobile phone as a modem (EVDO) you would know why. First reason is that there is no program for seems editing for mac. In other words it works (if at all) thanks to windows.
-
2005-10-16 3:07 amnivenh
If you have an EVDO PCMCIA card:
http://www.tuaw.com/2005/07/01/os-x-evdo/
If you just have a BT phone w/ internet access:
http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000189.php
Looks like its been possible for some time now. Also, for the other readers here…
“A seem is a portion of nonvolatile memory, usually small in size, containing operational data and parameters. Typical modern Motorola phones include a seem, although they are usually slightly different between manufacturer chipsets. The Motorola E815 has 9,000 (0x2328) unique master seem records, but only really a half dozen that are interesting. Because the information a seem holds cannot typically be altered directly through the handset, specialized software and a USB data cable is required to perform “mods”, or modifications.”
I’d hardly say having a program to ‘hack’ your phone’s “seem”‘s is a shortcoming on mac that makes windows just a no brainer, c’mon. Afterall, if there’s a *nix version, there’s a good chance that it already works or can be made to work on osx.
If you don’t like osx or apple, that’s fine, but it seems your grasping at straws to make a point about mac’s being just incapable of some obscure task.
“Even if users experience PC trouble after installing the patch, they will still be protected against any attack exploiting the Windows flaw, a Microsoft representative said.”
Yeah man, even if you can’t even log onto your PC, you don’t have to worry about opening an email attachment containing a worm that will exploit the flaw, because, well you are patched. But wait a minute here, you may not be able to use your freaking computer anyway.
Good one Microsoft.
I guess they found out the best way to protect PC users. Take away their ability to even use their PC (like taking a teens car keys away so he can’t drive and thereby kill himself) After all, unless you are firewalled, anti-virused, and anti-spywared up the rear end, you might as well hand your PC over to the cretans who write malware.
Do yourselves a favor- buy a Mac or switch to Linux, BSD, or something other than Bill Gates’ Kool-Aid.
This article clearly shows the importance of testing a patch on various configurations before releasing it to the public. While MicroSoft in general do test in thousands upon thousands configurations, apparently this particular one was not tested against for some reason.
What I see from a lot of OSS projects (many major ones at that) are patches that while they fix a particular problem, they have not been rigorously tested to see if the patch cause any problems somewhere else.
The general attitude I have encountered is that in the OSS world, if a patch for one thing breaks something else, it’s the responsibility of the maintainers/programmers of all those “something else”‘s to fix the problems that appear instead.
It may work for OSS projects but is a greatly flawed way of doing things.
Is the MicroSoft way of doing it the best way? Certainly not, but at the same time they don’t have the option of just fixing the problem. They also have to ensure that the patch is transparent to applications that relies on code that was patched.
Linux is good and stable and mostly free. But it’s too hard for average Joe to be comfortable.
Window is fairly easy to use, but it’s too difficult to troubleshoot and fix for average user.
So that leaves Macs. It’s easy to use and easy to maintain. You may argue Macs cost more to own (which I strongly disagree), the time and headache saved is money earned IMHO.
-
2005-10-16 12:14 ammorgoth
Quote: “Linux is good and stable and mostly free. But it’s too hard for average Joe to be comfortable.”
Mostly true. In most instances, though, you can install Linux, set it up and configure it, and then just leave it, it’ll just keep running. Most of the command line stuff is for administration of the Linux box, so if you don’t need to do any of that, you can avoid the CLI. We’re seeing a reasonable number of mothers/fathers/grandparents using Linux that has been set up for them by their children/grandchildren, and they’re happily use it.
Do remember that the vast majority of people these days use their computers for only a small subset of tasks:
1. Surf the web
2. Email
3. Digital images from a digital camera
4. Play movies
5. Play mp3s
6. games (most older people aren’t going to be playing games like World of Warcraft etc, but games like Solitaire or freecell).
Linux can be easily set up to do ALL of the above, with minimum maintenance etc.
Quote: “Window is fairly easy to use, but it’s too difficult to troubleshoot and fix for average user.”
Windows is not easy to use. Take for instance, asking a normal Windows user to find and tell you the version of Microsoft Windows that they’re using. This is something basic, and simple, yet the vast majority of users have no idea.
The real problem is that Microsoft Windows was deliberately dumbed down to the point where “anything goes”, and this has left it wide open to virus/trojan/worm/spyware exploits. You should never sacrifice security at the cost of ease of use. Never.
Now, consider this:
By default, releasing Microsoft Windows with ‘run as user’ enabled – so everytime you want to do something, you have to enter a password etc (something that they’re doing with Vista). It would be more secure than the current model, but how many people would bitch and complain about it? “oh it’s too difficult”, “oh it’s just wasting time”. The basic problem is that the majority of computer users are dumb. Not only that, they do NOT want to learn the basics of using a computer. They are trained monkeys performing a repetitive task, nothing more, and nothing less. To them, they never even consider security or reliability. The vast majority of these users will know someone else who can “just fix it for me”.
So, here is our real problem, in a nutshell. More people are using computers than are really ‘qualified’ to do so. They’re expectations are simply ‘do this, do that, press this, press that’, without any real comprehension of what they are doing, or why. This is a recipe for disaster! It’s not a matter that Linux is hard, or too hard, it’s a matter of people do not wish to learn, even the basics. The basics would suffice for 97% of computer usage issues. If the average user learned the basics, before ever touching any computer (no matter what operating system it was using), then computing would be a safer place.
As an example, my father got a computer nearly 3 years ago. He kept asking me the same questions, over and over and over, despite myself sending him simple written documentation with lots of screendumps for him to follow. He didn’t want to do that. He wanted to talk to myself on the phone, make me waste precious time trying to explain things to him over and over so that he could comprehend it. In the end, I had to be cruel to be kind, and I stopped helping him, thus forcing him to learn and start to work things out for himself. He’s far from a super computer user now, but he can do basic stuff himself. And that’s how it should be imho.
Quote: “So that leaves Macs. It’s easy to use and easy to maintain. You may argue Macs cost more to own (which I strongly disagree), the time and headache saved is money earned IMHO.”
I’d say relatively easy to use. Not everything is rosy with OS X. But, it is remarkably easier to use than either Linux or Windows, I would agree. For what they offer, Macs are expensive. Apple has always been a hardware company, and in order to make money, it has to make a nice profit on the hardware. I’d like to see the cost price of all the parts of a PowerMac G5 and the markup that has been added on. Sure, every computer maker has markup, but I think you’ll find that the Apple markup is significantly higher. The Apple hardware subsidises the OS X system (I think that OS X is way too cheap for what it is, and what it can do, and for how well it does do it [most of the times]). Having worked at Apple Australia, providing technical assistance, you’d be surprised at how many Apple users have issues with basic stuff. We come back full circle, to my earlier argument, that the majority of people don’t want to learn the basics, they just want it to work. I’m sorry guys, but life doesn’t work that way. I can’t think of anything else in life where it “just works” without the user making some basic attempt to learn how to do it first. An example that comes to mind – setting the clock on a Microwave oven. Most cases that not very intuitive (but not hard either), and a quick glance at the user manual is enough to help do it. You’ve just learnt some of the ‘basics’.
Making an operating system simple, and easy to use, is not an easy task. Too simple, and security (and thus reliability) suffers. Too hard, an none, but the highly computer literate will want to use it.
Some food for thought.
Dave
Is this new? I mean the service pack tyranny of re-doing your whole network must be common place and long standing standard operating procedure by now.
Folks need to change permissions on the “Registration” directory before applying the patch, assuming the permissions have been changed in the first place. I suspect only geeks will have changed permissions, and geeks should be able to change them back. The archetypal “Joe User” will be clueless, and won’t even know he or she had a Registration directory, thus the patch will work fine.
As for me, I run Linux. It “just works.” Like others have said, my Windows use has faded over the years. I’m glad I no longer have to mess with it.
Peter Besenbruch
-
2005-10-16 10:47 amAnonymous
Huh, how’s that possible? I had to revert back to windows 98 to get everything to work ok again! Do not install!
-
2005-10-16 3:18 pmAnonymous
Huh, how’s that possible? I had to revert back to windows 98 to get everything to work ok again!
You mean, you switched to Linux, right?:)
When Apple releases the new PowerMac’s I’m buying one and giving my XP system the boot.
I mean, you’d think that the worlds biggest company might think to test the patch in a situation where permissions have been changed.
I mean……….wow………..are drunk monkeys doing quality control at MS?
This reminds me of the time I “fixed” ssh across a network. Yeah, I fixed it alright.
This quote made me chuckle:
Even if users experience PC trouble after installing the patch, they will still be protected against any attack exploiting the Windows flaw, a Microsoft representative said.
And if you bury your computer in concrete, it’s pretty secure too.
As long as it isn’t plugged into the inet.
Off topic, but the nice thing about ssh is that the current session stays running through a restart of the daemon, so as long as you leave the current session connected, you can test logging in to a new session and if it doesn’t work, you can still fix it …. just as long as you don’t lose connection
Windows software causing more harm than good? THE HELL YOU SAY?!
NO…NO…I WILL NOT LISTEN TO THIS…THIS IS JUST…TOO BIG A SHOCK
of the cure being worse than the disease.
How about the title being shortened to “Windows may wreak PC havoc”?
Two weeks ago one of our win2k prof computers, who had automatic updates enabled, lost nearly all tcp/ip connectivity. Ping did work, but DHCP and DNS name resolution were no longer working.
Automatic updates can cause trouble, but are – in general – a good thing, and Microsoft does a good job most of the time. De difficulty lies in the fact that there is not enough time to test each security update: wait too long, and too many computers get hacked.
Well, possibly, you’re using an insecure operating system? If you used a secure operating system from the start…you wouldn’t need all of this “patching” would you…
Dave
There is an OS that does not require patches or security updates?
Can you provide us a link to it please?
Cool! I thought it was just me. Since that patch, my anti-virus started taking 100% CPU usage and I had to disable it.
A few days before, I had also gone to the WindowsUpdate page and updated the recommended patches as well: sound card, network card and Windows Media Player 10. Unfortunately, my sound card stopped working and I had to rollback to the previous driver. And now Windows Media Player looks completely different.
hehe. Fun & games. Never had a problem before.
I have to admit I am finally also fed up Windows and Microsoft’s lies about security and decided I will switch to Linux. I have been putting this off for the longest time and feel that now the time has come that Linux has become the better way to go. I’ll try out Ubuntu which I have to admit looks really good.
Welcome to the darkside, young Anonymous. You will have good times here and in time, you will learn to sneer and poke abuse at other, lesser mortals………
anyway, in seriousness.
DO NOT SWITCH if this is the only reason ! You need to do some research first…
Can Ubuntu let you access all the files you have on your computer ? I mean, mp3, divx etc ?
Do you know where to look to sort this out ?
What about a distro that has these out of the box, like Mepis ?
Doh man!
ALL linux distros lets you have access to mp3 divx whatever [he might have to look aroung to get it].
If you want access, then nothing gives you so much access as linux does.
If he knows how to write something in this forum, he knows how to surf in google, or posting in mail-lists.
Take it easy, raver31
Of course Linux is a better choice for apps for MP3, Divx, WMV.
What my post was saying, was this guy decided on Ubuntu. Ubuntu does not legally support these codecs out of the box. The guy is moving over from Windows, so he is bound to have a collection, which are usable on his Windows system.
It could be a bad first look at Linux, if he cannot do the same things under Linux as he can under Windows.
Now, the original poster might be an uber-geek who knows about http://ubuntuguide.org and how to add the repositories to sources.list to enable codec downloads, or he might be the usual Windows user, expecting a setup.exe for everything, I don’t know, but I was telling him to check other distros………… much the same way you did in your post to him 8^)
Welcome
And a wise choice. But before jumping, take a look at the distros, to make sure you’ve chosen one you think you can live with.
I have to admit I am finally also fed up Windows and Microsoft’s lies about security and decided I will switch to Linux. I have been putting this off for the longest time and feel that now the time has come that Linux has become the better way to go. I’ll try out Ubuntu which I have to admit looks really good.
Comeon! Be a man! Choose Slackware or Debian. Ubuntu is for hide-under-mama’s-skirt fruitcakes.
Debian is for lilly lagging lolly gagging georges. Real men use LFS
Real geeks write their own OS from scratch… in assembly… in the dark…
Seriously though, whilst I used to agree with the grand parent, I soon realised not everyone wants to get dirty with the CLI, compiling kernels and so on. Ubuntu is so far the best distro for people coming from Windows IMHO, as most of it does Just Work(tm) and lets most users just get stuck in and use their PC.
Ooooh, ya beat me to it….
Yes… slackware… it’s wonderful spending time editing a config file to get the scroll wheel on my mouse to work.
–Former slackware “user” (i.e. file editor) / Ubuntu convert now getting actual work done
Choose Slackware or Debian. Ubuntu is for hide-under-mama’s-skirt fruitcakes.
All right thinking geeks recognize that unless you use Linux from Scratch you are a girlie-man. Not even Gentoo is geeky enough!
{o^$|>
[u]All right thinking geeks recognize that unless you use Linux from Scratch you are a girlie-man. Not even Gentoo is geeky enough! [/u]
LFS is one step short of using Windows, they supply init scripts and everything.
Real geeks use DIY Linux and their imagination
“[u]All right thinking geeks recognize that unless you use Linux from Scratch you are a girlie-man. Not even Gentoo is geeky enough! [/u]
LFS is one step short of using Windows, they supply init scripts and everything.
Real geeks use DIY Linux and their imagination ”
I recode my own operating system from scratch everytime I reboot my computer. In Visual Basic though.
“Comeon! Be a man! Choose Slackware or Debian. Ubuntu is for hide-under-mama’s-skirt fruitcakes.”
Not all users want to start editing config files on their first attempt; they just want an experience that works as much out of the box as possible. This is his choice. No cracks about my distro is better than yours; and the I am so 133t because I use this distro.
Check out distrowatch; the majority of the most popular distros are the ones created for the new user. The other most popular distros cater to the other side of the house. This is a learning curve and it doesn’t have to be as difficult the first time around. You want the new users to stay around? Right? Don’t push.
PS: I am FreeBSD and Debian user.
Anonymous (IP: 24.128.50.—)
1) Start with your distro of choice
2) Sign up to mailing lists, web forums; be active; do some reading (never hurts).
3) Stick with it and you will do fine.
4) Best of luck and welcome to FOSS
mmmm..yesssss..not slitherin…. thannnn..UBUNTU!!!
Seriously..huge online community.. lots of n00bs.. but still lots of vets who just got tired of dealing with debian installer.. over 17000 packages, a great philosophy. But after installing Breezy(5.10)i had to figure out how to install an alternative java, manually install flash(no biggie) and just yanked realplayer from apt(sudo apt-get install realplayer).. i now have a fully usable system.. and openoffice 2.0 beta.. is schweeet.If you are willing to roll up your sleeves for maybe a week…yeah..try it. If not, ide say get a Mac.
49 yr old non IT Mac and Ubuntu user.
The guy who lives down the hall from me was a Debian developer, but now is a Ubuntu Developer and hands out Ubuntu cdroms.
Macs are cool, as long as your willing to get a new system. Otherwise you can make use of your current hardware with your choice of BSD/Linux/Whatever-nix.
I’m using Windows only for games, everything else is Ubuntu. I also use PClinuxOS, and in older machines, ZenWalk (formerly MiniSlack).
But do try some distros first, then decide which one you shoould use. Hey, you can even use a couple of them in multi-boot.
Just try them out. That’s the fun part.
Advice:
1) Go to a dual boot system. You will find yourself using Windows less and less with time, but you’ll always have a way back when you need it.
2) The best way to do dual boot is by installing a separate hard drive.
3) When you do this, make sure you put /home on its own partition.
4) Look at Suse and Mandriva as well as Ubuntu. And the suggestion to try Mepis, rather than Ubuntu, if you want a Debian based system, is a good one.
I’ve installed several systems for new linux users, and installed earlier versions of Ubuntu also. Ubuntu may have improved lately, but Suse, Mandrake or Mepis all strike me as better bets for a new linux user. Good luck.
/home on its own partition, or own drive is always the way to go.
also, I said earlier that Mepis would be a better choice than Ubuntu for multimedia codecs out of the box, but one of my tests for any distro has to be this;
http://www.apple.com/trailers/
if it plays them from the browser straight off, then it is a good start.
Hi,
“1) Go to a dual boot system. You will find yourself using Windows less and less with time, but you’ll always have a way back when you need it.”
This is the best bit of advice I’ve seen all week.
I’ve got several computers, and about a year ago wanted to setup a web server. I put Gentoo and Apache on one of them with the intention of leaving it running in the corner and not really using it for anything else.
Now I only really use the Windows machines for playing games – if they crash or get infected by the plague I can fdisk them and have them back working in an hour without worrying about losing important things.
The only real problem I’ve had with Gentoo is that it doesn’t come with a free UPS (power failures suck).
-Brendan
Windows is a relict of the past… I cannot imagine any serious business running their production servers on this piece of crap.
GNU/Linux | *BSD all the way baby…
My God. It’s amazing what you WinTel users put up with. If this was anything thing else you would have thrown it in the trash by now. I pity you; like watching a little kid get beat up by the school bully.
Here you go my foolish friends. Salvation.
http://www.apple.com
Who says “WinTel” anymore? Nobody. You do know that Apple is switching to Intels too, right? I don’t even know why I bother replying to trolls…
It’s still is WinTel. Have you forgotten that Intel is doing the hardware based DRM which is being tied to MS.
Intel’s New Pentium D Equipped with DRM Capability
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,121027,00.asp
Intel quietly adds DRM to new chips
http://www.digitmag.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=4915
Microsoft Palladium Next Generation Secure Computing Base
http://www.epic.org/privacy/consumer/microsoft/palladium.html
MP3s Get Copy Controls
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,115055,00.asp
Just because Apple is switching to a different processor means what exactly? The operating systems will both become as vulnerable because the run on Intel? And the term is need more now then before because Apple is moving over to x86 and when people start asking questions it will be easier to define one from the other with less tech speak.
Troll? It’s not like I’m wrong or anything! WIndows is a huge pile of sh*te. If it was Apple that had something like PATCH TUESDAY!! Wake up! Would you have any doubt in your mind that it’s time to try something different. How about you think alternatively here!?! Apple or linux or Apple, whatever just leave that pile of stinking trash that is Windows where it belongs. Maybe Vista will be different maybe it wont.
Here you go my foolish friends. Salvation.