posted by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st May 2008 08:05 UTC, submitted by Mohammed Saleh
The tests he performed could be more or less grouped into multimedia related tests (Blender, Avidemux, etc.) and hard disk performance tests (the command line RAR utility and ClamAV). The results seem to indicate that Windows XP beats Ubuntu hands-down when it comes to multimedia related applications, and Ubuntu has the advantage in IO intensive applications.
Saleh also did a multitasking test. He wrote a script which performed several tasks simultaneously to see which of the two operating systems was better at multitasking. This time, Ubuntu beat Windows by a wide margin.

The methodology of the test appears to be fairly sound. The tests were performed on the exact same machine, except for one tiny detail: Windows XP was installed on a SATA disk, while Ubuntu had to settle for an ATA one. Interestingly, Ubuntu still outperformed Windows XP on IO intensive tasks.
Just so you know.
Related Articles
posted by Amjith Ramanujam on Wed 23rd Jul 2008 14:32, submitted by ahz1
posted by Amjith Ramanujam on Tue 22nd Jul 2008 17:54
posted by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jun 2008 17:12, submitted by stonyandcher


