We’ve had a couple of conversations with the very affable
Greg Estes, SGI’s VP of Corporate Marketing, over the past couple of months. Here they are patched together. Greg talks to us about SGI, Hollywood, tough financial times, Linux, and everything. On related news, SGI now owns a… world record.
1. Why the close relationship between SGI and Hollywood?
Greg Estes: We’ve been targeting this industry for 20 years and not necessarily just for the revenue it brings us. SGI lives and dies by being at the forefront of the computer industry.
Unlike our competitors, we only target technical and creative users such as; in the Arts and Sciences We don’t target Enterprise users.
We focus on the technical cutting edge. This makes for strange bedfellows, but Hollywood and the defense industry constantly push the boundaries of technology. They are never satisfied with good enough and that’s really healthy for us. They ask for things years before it shows up in another marketplace—they keep us on the leading edge.
Let me put it this way, our first customer was NASA, and our second was Disney.
2. And it works. This past Academy Awards was another big night for SGI, wasn’t it?
Greg Estes: Well, we’re thrilled that our customers won again. This marks eight straight years that all the winners and nominated films used SGI systems. That speaks for itself.
3. Do SGI engineers root for one customer over another?
Greg Estes: Clearly we were pulling for all of our customers and that’s everyone that was nominated. We’re thrilled for all our customers and are happy with the recognition that they are receiving. Also in the new category of animated feature films.
4. That was a spectactularly diplomatic answer.
Greg Estes: Thanks. But, it’s true. One of the coolest things about working with these people is the way they push the envelope. They are among the most technically astute and at a level where they push the bounds of computers. A lot of their work is done by code written in-house on IRIX. If our customers didn’t like our OS they would probably write one of their own. It’s a technical and discriminating audience.
5. Are there perks to working with Hollywood?
Greg Estes: It’s a fun sector to work with. But we really get huge satisfaction seeing what our customers do with our machines. We’re pretty humbled by their talent. So we continue to build the best tools for these artists and animators. They ask us for things years before they might show up in another market.
6. Such as?
Greg Estes: They were pushing us to support HDTV back in 1990. So SGI machines have supported HDTV for 12 years. They wanted high-quality, high-res movie preview striped across a RAID setup. Today people are pretty used to putting a DVD into their player and great watching a movie at high resolution. Now try doing that at six times the resolution and then try doing it six years ago. And that’s what SGI does.
7. Can SGI still provide the future for Hollywood?
Greg Estes: I have two answers for that question. We are absolutely under attack. This is not a large market but it has a lot of prestige. It seems that every 18 months IBM announces that they have plans to move in and take over this space. Then nothing happens. And now HP has a full court press going around Linux. But not much has come of that yet.
So, why buy an SGI machine when any image you can make on one of our machines can now also be made on a Mac? A lot of the answer has to do with how much interactivity other environments offer, and how long it took to make those images. So, the interactivity is key. The second point is our expertise in the market. Just before the Academy Awards, John Labrie of Weta Digital was over here talking to the press. When he was asked about why he works with SGI, he didn’t mention how well our system scales or anything like that. His answer was that when he talks with SGI we actually understand where he’s coming from—that SGI understands his business better than any other computer company.
People can do good work on a PC or a Mac or whatever, but our track record, with the world’s best animators and a string of Oscars winning customers speaks for itself.
8. Some of these images are being made with Alias | Wavefront products. How do they fit in to the whole scheme of things?
Greg Estes: We treat Alias | Wavefront as a very separate company. It is a wholly owned SGI subsidiary and they’ve done a tremendous job of capturing market share. Since we purchased Alias and Wavefront we had to go to partners like Discreet and SoftImage and make sure that they were comfortable maintaining their ISV relationship with us. It’s just that kind of world.
9. Where did SGI’s downtimes come from?
Greg Estes: It seemed that at times in the last couple of years, I had to remind people that the name of the company wasn’t ‘Financially Troubled SGI.’ To go from a few cents a share just after 9/11 to flirting with $5 a share six months later is a great turnaround.
Our problems weren’t really related to the market slump that made the covers of Time or Newsweek. That wasn’t so much a tech bust as a dotcom bust.
We lost focus and leapt into areas that weren’t historically our strength. Commodity PCs and Intel/NT-based workstations with low differentiation were a market space that we shouldn’t have gone near.
Also, if we had the chance to purchase Cray again…we might reconsider the way it was done. That was a difficult merger. SGI has sold off the Cray vector business, but we’ve kept some great IP and great engineers.
So, in a nutshell, with much over simplification, we lost focus. Our expenses were greater than our revenue. We had to trim down the unnecessary expenditures. A lot of credit goes to Bob Bishop for settling SGI down and fixing our focus. He took measures to move us back in the right direction. He took arrows in his back at points, but you can right the ship, and we’re very close to doing it. We hear that straight from our customers.
10. How is morale at SGI now?
Greg Estes: Morale is good, kind of like we’ve all been through something significant that forged a greater bond between us. I don’t think that the hit we were taking was the same as all the other tech companies. During tough times Ford might put off building a new website. But they can’t put off the new crash analysis of the 2005 Explorer, and that’s where we would come in.
11. Are you still attracting a lot of talent?
Greg Estes: I had an opening for director of product marketing that we posted on Friday and by Monday morning I had 107 resumes in my inbox.
12. Being flooded with resumes is usually a good indicator of a company’s health.
Greg Estes: We have an awesome culture here. When we lost our momentum we attracted a lot of people that were interested in helping SGI. Now that things have improved, we’re attracting another crowd of people.
We have a reputation as a great place to work. Maybe I’m not objective about this. Once you’ve worked with Steven Spielberg and Stephen Hawking and people who change the world, it becomes difficult to think about going to work for some search engine.
13. How long have you been with SGI?
Greg Estes: I’ve been with the company for 12 years. I originally came here to be the “video-guy” working with the HDTV initiative. Then I went on to be a project manager with the Onyx line. After that I went on to high-end graphics and high-end broadband applications.
14. What’s on your desktop?
Greg Estes: Right now I have an SGI 1600W Flat Panel and a Dell laptop. The laptop is running NT4 with service pack five. Words can’t describe how much I hate it. I’m more of a Mac and IRIX fan. Sales and Marketing people are typically using Windows 2000 or NT.
For our own product line, SGI is now a Microsoft-free environment. We’ve discontinued our money losing IA32 product line, where we never should have been in the first place. We can’t compete with giant companies in that market. You’d think that would have been obvious to us, but it wasn’t. The margins are brutal. The competition is good enough, and you can be out distributed and out marketed by Dell. Besides, on NT you can’t innovate, at least not like you can on IRIX or even Linux.
15. I remember seeing an Origin in a server room one time. People were gathering around the thing to get a look.
Greg Estes: Yeah, we make good machines. Our workstations are consistently rated the best.
16. Do SGI engineers swagger around the halls?
Greg Estes: Not just inside SGI. It really happens with our customers. If you’ve got a $200, 000 SGI Onyx machine as your machine, you’re damn good at your job. I’ve been to post-production houses where they’ve got their Onyx in the lobby in a plexi-glass booth, where it’s lit from underneath and it looks great. It’s a point of pride for them, a sign that they are a contender.
17. SGI customers are different?
Greg Estes : Our customers are probably similar in devotion to the Mac users that Apple has. I don’t think that people walk down the halls where they work and high five each other saying, “Hey, I just got a Dell!” It just doesn’t have the any ring, does it?
18. What kind of representation does SGI have in Comp/Sci programs or at technical colleges?
Greg Estes: Here’s two answers to that question: It’s really, really good, and it’s almost non existent. Depending on what the CS program is geared towards. If you’re in a CS program that has an emphasis on graphics and modeling SGI is all over the place. Whereas you won’t find us at a school that promotes what students really need to understand basic networking and IT infrastructure. You can find SGI being used at McGill University and Sheridan College, or at Stanford University where they’re trying to break new ground in medical imaging. A lot of schools don’t have much money to spend and there’s a lot of competition because it’s not a big market. Kyoto University recently bought a 768 CPU machine for bio-informatics. I would suspect that there are 10 times as many places that don’t have SGI machines set up than places that do.
But, it really is important that we maintain a good reputation with kids coming out of schools. We have an educational discount program, to drive those programs into the educational committee.
19. Would it be out of line to call SGI a boutique computer company?
Greg Estes: We’re probably the world’s only $1.5 Billion computer company. It seems that computer makers are either huge or somewhat smaller than us, say in the area of $400 million. In the broader market, it’s important that we stay focused on our core customers.
Because of our specialties we can’t be considered a baby version of HP or IBM. And nobody here has any interest in working for HP or IBM. Or Sun, God forbid. Those companies are trying to solve different problems for their customers. In some IT situations decisions might go MS, then Sun, then MS and then back to Sun and then back again. But when a CIO or CTO makes a decision to use SGI and IRIX they’re making a clear decision to build a genuine advantage. They use SGI at the core of their business. We are at the strategic strikezone of our customers.
20. Who are your core customers now?
Greg Estes: We target five specific markets or industries:
1)Defense and Government
2)The Collective Sciences: bio-informatics, chemistry, medical imaging.
3)Manufacturing, the automotive industry and aerospace industry. We have 17/17 of the top automakers as customers
4)Media, Hollywood, but also Network television for such things as media serving, digital asset management and on-air graphics for special events like the Olympics or in the production of virtual sets.
5) The Energy industry, which is more or less the Oil&Gas industry.
This is a good example of the importance of turning raw data into good decisions. When you’re deciding where to drill your next well you want to be right, because that can be a $45 Million mistake.
We have an impressive array of customers who prefer our products. Jaron Lanier , a pioneer in virtual reality development does a high percentage of his work on SGI machines. Stephen Hawking is a reference customer of ours. Anyone can look at what our customers are doing in post production and the whole digital image revolution.
21. Is that the SGI elevator speech?
Greg Estes: Sort of. This could be redundant. At SGI our focus is on just technical and creative customers in five markets: government and defense, sciences, manufacturing, media and energy, in the areas of high-performance computing, visualization and complex data management where they gain insight from data. Our customers use SGI at the core of their business. We are at the strategic strikezone of our customers.
22. Do open source projects and contributions suffer during hard times?
Greg Estes: We’re very keen about participation in Linux community. Releasing XFS to the community is a great example of our commitment. However, there are things that Linux doesn’t do that IRIX does. But IRIX has received a lot of intense focus for a long time. I think the most CPUs you can run on a Linux system is 16, while on IRIX it’s 1024. If a client is looking for the kind of power and extraordinary throughput that 1024 CPUs offers, Linux isn’t an option, nor is any other OS for that matter. We’re it.
23. SGI is a company that seems to influence technology far beyond it’s range of customers.
Greg Estes: We are creating the technology that is behind the greatest breakthroughs in the 21st century. You could look at the whole 3D graphics industry, NVIDIA, ATI. We brought 3D graphics to the industry. Not to mention OpenGL, which we licensed to the industry. The graphics industry wouldn’t have come about without SGI.
You can see our influence in the next generation of 3D Graphics with our Reality Centers. We use the term Reality Center for a variety of immersive and non-immersive technologies. Typically, it’s a bank of three large screens that cover the peripheral vision, are powered by three Onyx systems and are seamlessly edge integrated.
24. You’re also making a big push for Visual Area Networking (VAN).
Greg Estes: I think that we’re really onto something with VAN. I don’t think that we knew what we had when it was being developed. It was something that customers were telling us that they wanted, the ability to access their Onyx work station remotely. We’re shifting pixels around instead of data, with this extraordinarily thin client.
25. And how is VAN being received?
Greg Estes: Well, if you were an IRIX ISV suddenly the usability of our big machines, and by extension your product, has been extended and a new market is now available. And you can access this new opportunity on NT, Linux, Solaris Mac or PalmOS machines without porting code.
26. Greg, the Linux Journal article was pretty harsh at points. How did it go over at SGI?
Greg Estes: It was disappointing. It felt as if some of the statements were taken out of context in the entire article. It’s disappointing because ILM is an Oscar winning customer at the top of their game and they have a long history of being successful with IRIX and SGI equipment.
It sounded like opinions coming from a different viewpoint, rather than someone who has had a lot of success with SGI.
What I must say about ILM is that in our experience they’re the brightest, most talented and honorable people you would ever want to work with.
That’s why it’s curious to hear these comments disparaging our equipment versus other alternatives.
27. The adoption of Linux in Hollywood seems to be a popular story for the press.
Greg Estes: It’s very easy for the press to say that customers are switching from SGI hardware to Linux on Intel IA_32 machines. Much of the move is amplified by vendors in this market space; however we have a ton of
customers using SGI equipment in Hollywood.
Our competitors are simply putting as much in the air about their success as we do about ours.
28. Is Linux a growing force in Hollywood?
Greg Estes: Linux in Hollywood? Absolutely. Absolutely.
A good animator can do good work on a Linux system. What studios need is for their animators to use the industry standard tools. And for those companies that can afford R&D departments like the big studios, they also need the
ability to build their own tools, and do their work on as cheap a platform as they can afford. For a while SGI was the cheapest that would provide the necessary power. That was until commodity based systems advanced enough to
perform adequately for some of those tasks.
29. Why is Linux so popular in this market space?
Greg Estes: I think the technology_focused customers in Hollywood are pretty glad that they don’t have to move to NT because it’s pretty tough to innovate on NT, especially in graphics and that’s precisely what the film
industry needs.
I should point out that there is a lot of stuff in IRIX that isn’t in Linux. That’s why people such as the Visual Effects Society (among others in the FX world) want Linux to do what IRIX can do and they want all of it from one
company. And no one company is doing that but SGI.
31. And IRIX is still satisfying customers?
Greg Estes: Absolutely. PCs are getting more capable, but many, many customers still use IRIX everyday. Even at ILM _ every single frame goes through an SGI machine at some point.
32. Commodity PCs have advanced thanks to Moore’s law. How does the law apply outside x86?? development?
Estes : Moore’s Law is fundamental. It says that on a specific date you know that for, say, $3000 you can get a machine with X amount of computing power. That’s great. But what if you are a computer maker and don’t offer a
machine in the $3000 range?
That’s an important thing to consider, because it turns out that, Moore’s law also holds true for all price ranges. So if you’re customer that is looking for, say, $50,000 of computing power there is product available at that range and it will have progressed in terms of power just as much in relative terms as the $3,000 system.
As computing power improves through the whole range then higher end vendors will lose market to cheaper alternatives. However, there are also problems that become more approachable to higher end machines.
PC makers could find that people who might have bought a PC for email and scheduling can do those things very well with a $200 PDA. The market drops out for all computer makers at some point. This is the natural order of
things. It’s not that we’re losing to the competition; we’re not even trying to compete for those seats. We’re chasing new parts of the market that require higher_end processing, visualization and data storage.
33. So what now?
Greg Estes: We’re trying to solve different problems now. But what we’re working on is determining where SGI fits into the workflow, and that position is constantly shifting. Where we excel is in areas like high_definition visualization, or work in digital dailies or ongoing display rendering, like inferno and flame style editing.
Recently we’ve seen a shift from volume Maya desktops to higher_end machines able to manage all the systems in the facility. Solutions like (storage area networks) that can be used by anyone in an organization whatever client
they’re using, and at Fiber Channel rates.
One really good example of our new customers is Efilm, the result of a partnership between Deluxe Laboratories and Panavision. EFILM uses SGI IRIX visualization systems, storage and high_speed connectivity to produce high_resolution digital distribution masters that can be used for film output, digital cinema releases and home video.
Great interview, but too much marketing spiel. Just let us know how many FPS in Q3Arena the Onyx box dishes out. At HDTV resolutions, of course.
That’s what owning an Onyx is all about isn’t it?
Playing games …
I now own a purple Indigo2 R10K/195 with 384 megs of ram, and a SolidImpact graphics board (which is the lowest you could get for 3d, no texture engine).
I love the machine, it’s verry fast for it’s time. It’s just a great, fast, stable machine to work on. I use blender on it a lot, and also play mp3’s with it
It’s still running IRIX 6.2, if only i could get my hands on a 6.5 cd set … it would really make my life a lot easyer.
People at Silicon Graphics were really really creative people back then, and it shows, their machines were waaay ahead of their time, and i’m sure people at SGI now still are.
The I2 for me is a cool machine, because of the way it can do 3D, but it’s nothing compared to a decent GF or radeon these days (and i really mean nothing). But besides that it’s a verry cool unix box that works verry comfortably. I never had it crash once on me (except for coredumps by netscape).
oh well i could rable on for a while. It just comes down to it that these were great machines ALL ROUND, not only graphically. It definately has great value as a daily UNIX workstation too.
Take Care
p13as3
Seems like they are doing some good work with Linux, getting it to scale on a 64 processor NUMA-based Itanium system
“SGI Demos 64-Proc Linux Box”
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/09/09/1445238.shtml?tid=139
http://www.sgi.com/newsroom/press_releases/2002/september/stream.ht…
SGI recently announced its expanded business strategy in which it will incorporate systems based on the Itanium processor family running Linux into its established line of high-performance computing systems.
If they are regaining their focus, why the Linux on Itanium 2 demo?… What’s it going to be, IRIX on MIPS or GNU/Linux on Intel?
As someone who almost worked for sgi’s server division (my job offer was rescinded when they went through layoffs last year), I got to see a good amount of their server engineering. My impression is that they put together scalable servers using “bricks.” There are router bricks which handle the i/o between the other bricks, cpu bricks (both mips and itanium) that each contain 2-4 cpus plus some local memory, i/o bricks which include pc card slots (such as pci), bricks that contain visualization hardware, etc etc. A server can be changed from MIPS to Intel by changing the cpu bricks from the mips model to the itanium model and then installing Linux over the previous IRIX installation (or vice-versa). So, to answer your question, johnG, they’re going with both: mips and itanium.
(fwiw, my interview at sgi was so cool. nowhere else have I almost tripped on a 32-cpu supercomputer.. )
Hmm, the second sentence of his first answer reads:
Unlike our competitors, we only target technical and creative users such as; in the Arts and Sciences We don’t target Enterprise users.
Looks garbled but interesting. Could this maybe be fixed?
Right now I have an SGI 1600W Flat Panel
Yeah, mine is now on its 3rd machine, and the 4th is in the mail. Really nice monitor. Too bad they stopped making them…
johnG: If they are regaining their focus, why the Linux on Itanium 2 demo?… What’s it going to be, IRIX on MIPS or GNU/Linux on Intel?
It is way different. Linux is an commodity. SGI would earn a lot of savings from it. Itanium could be a commodity one day. MIPS are IRIX can actually pull SGI to its death. Linux on IA32 isn’t what they are competing with.
Too bad that no comment/question about the new generation of hardware 3D video acceleration, like ATi Radeon 9700 and yet to be released CineForce from nVidia… I really would like to see some comments of SGI about this thread… maybe next time… =]
I met one of the engineers who developed part of that monitor.
He still has a bunch of them available from his private stock.
I think I still have his contact info at work.
Also look for Deep Video imaging company on the web.
His name is Dan Ebinitzcki (sp?). He is a nice guy.
http://www.actualdepth.com/index3.html
Some info about him
Daniel Evanicky, Chief Technical Officer
Dan Evanicky comes from an extensive background where he possesses a broad knowledge of flat panel displays from 30 years of experience in research and development, design and manufacturing, and processing equipment. He has extensive relationships with Asian display firms and over 40 patents, either granted or in process.
Beginning in the Flat Panel Display industry in 1967, as a LCD Process Engineer for Texas Instruments, Dan has held several leadership positions, including Senior LCD Process Engineer/Research Specialist at Kylex (Division of Exxon Enterprises)/3M, Display Project Manager at Greyhawk Systems, Director of Display Development at Unisys/Dynabrook Technologies, Director of Display Systems at Momenta, Inc and most recently Principal Scientist with SGI.
Thanks for the link. These look very nice.
http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/license.html
That’s dumb allright, but you should see what other oems do with mass-orders … compaq is bad, but probably ok. Dell is THE WORST.
Take Care
That was a nice interview. It is good to see some former greats trying to bring back the old glory. Best of luck to them.
Bummer the Cray merger didn’t work out better. Two old school companies who make great stuff just couldn’t get along. Must have had something to do with the fact that SGI was trying to make Windows workstations as their focus.
I would like to mention that only one company has done well selling intel boxes. That is dell. Everybody else has gotten killed. SGI tried to sell Intel instead of MIPS, and got creamed. Compaq tried to sell intel instead of Alpha, and couldn’t survive on their own. Ditto HP. IBM doesn’t even make their own anymore, it is all outsourced, and loses money. Seen gateway stock lately?
The problem is that if you don’t add technology value to a product than you can’t charge more for it than the next guy. And the next guy is always a manufacturing giant who sets up shop in third world countries. You just can’t compete with those companies on price.
It is good to see SGI trying to win market by making better products again. And they do have decent products. 1024 processor NUMA sigle OS systems. Nobody else does 1024 processors without clustering, nobody. Did I mention that those processors each draw only like 15W? And how cute is the brick system. Incremental upgrade is so cool.
Hope they survive the next couple of years. If they do expect to see them come back in a big way.
Zenja, you’re missing the point. Quake3 FPS is a benchmark for desktop systems. For high-end supercomputers, there are other tools to measure performance.
It’s like measuring how good a car is by measuring the power of all its light bulbs. Doesn’t make too much sense.
JReZIN, nVidia and ATI are stuff for low-end computers, like graphical workstations.
SGI servers use totally different things to do their 3D. Everything is different. Think, for example, that the internal bandwidth is many orders of magnitude higher than that of a PC.
It’s really like, not apples and oranges, but like hot-air baloons and rockets. An SGI server can pull data from a multi-terabyte database and generate 3D images in real-time and let you navigate through that. There’s no such thing with a PC.
14. What’s on your desktop?
Greg Estes: Right now I have an SGI 1600W Flat Panel and a Dell laptop. The laptop is running NT4 with service pack five. Words can’t describe how much I hate it. I’m more of a Mac and IRIX fan. Sales and Marketing people are typically using Windows 2000 or NT.
Why don’t they use laptops with Linux? Why don’t they use Mac Laptos? If you like Irix, it’s much easier using Linux than MS-Windows. Doesn’t convince me too much he’s an Irix lover
Florin, I know that, but the technology’s changing know… I’m not talking just about the “market” of 3D Acceleration cards, but the market of 3D hardware accelerated rendering with film quality that we’re very close…
A new gen card (ATi’s Radeon 9700 and to-be-released nVidia’s CineForce) can be used to render really _much_ more faster than general propose CPUs around now (it’s dedicated propose hardware vs general propose hardware after all…)… I would like to know if SGI’ll adopt this new gen hardware in their render-farm/render solutions… and what they think about it too! =]