User Conversations
posted by Almafeta on Tue 4th Mar 2008 18:54
posted by Almafeta on Fri 25th Jan 2008 15:37
What could have caused so crazy a jump to happen? I haven't had anything modded up to +128 lately, so has there been a change in the way those values are calculated?
posted by Almafeta on Thu 17th Jan 2008 13:46
1) Will it be its own section?
2) Will we be able to submit comics, like we are able to submit stories?
3) Will we be able to link comics to news items?
posted by Almafeta on Fri 9th Nov 2007 23:53
http://www.damnsmallbsd.org/
However, it hasn't had a release yet, which makes me a sad panda.
(I do like the palindromic nature of the name, though... 'Da*n Small BSD' could be abbreviated as 'DSB', inverse of BSD, or as 'DSBSD'...)
posted by Almafeta on Thu 25th Oct 2007 16:19
I heard from him that Vista SP1 is actually going to take out some of Vista's kernel-level security features, in order to facilitate hooking in third-party antivirus software into the kernel. He said said that it was because various antivirus manufacturers threatened an antitrust lawsuit if Microsoft did not introduce those vulnerabilities back into Vista.
(It'll also facilitate viruses compromising Windows, but that's also in the manufacturer's best interests, I'm sure.)
Can anyone confirm this from a reliable source?
posted by Almafeta on Sun 14th Oct 2007 02:53
I'm aware the details are probably boring, but what happened?
posted by Almafeta on Sat 11th Aug 2007 15:05
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070810165237718
In short: the UNIX copyrights are now legally considered to be owned by Novell, the company behind the Windows/Linux hybrid.
I haven't submitted it to OSnews since... well, this is Groklaw we're talking about, not a reputable source. Can anyone get confirmation on this from somewhere else?
posted by Almafeta on Tue 7th Aug 2007 20:02
Was that a bug, or was that by design? Or did that poor guy really just offend 501 people?
posted by Almafeta on Mon 30th Jul 2007 18:54
Interestingly, while doing (unrelated) research, I discovered that Windows was 'minimizing to icons' quite a whiel back -- since Windows 1.0, in fact, way back in 85 (maybe in 84, too, but not in 83 -- it was barely more than a pretty command line then). This Windows 1.0 feature would be changed for Windows 2.0 (when Microsoft licensed all those GUI features from Apple; it became minimize-to-'desktop'), but the idea of minimizing to an 'icon bar' would later be most notably resurrected for Windows 95 (along with labelling the icons with human-readable text).
Just an interesting bit of computing history. Everything old is new again!
posted by Almafeta on Fri 20th Jul 2007 15:24
Recently, management has announced their intention to switch the project I am working on to open source, "probably that new GNU license, because it's supposed to be the best."
Now, I like this job, a lot. Good people, easy atmosphere, and it's not profit-driven. However, if they finish this changeover, professional ethics will force me to leave... and I can't really afford to lose this job, knowing how long it took for me to find this one.
My question is this: What method can I use to prevent management from open-sourcing this project? Should I try to appeal to their ethics? Should I point out the flaws and unenforcability of the license? Or since this project will (by necessity) involve working with people's private data (including medical information, at times), can I somehow legally prevent them from copylefting the project?
Any help you could give me would be appreciated.
posted by Almafeta on Mon 25th Jun 2007 19:38
Could someone please fix this? Or is everyone seeing this?
posted by Almafeta on Mon 4th Jun 2007 18:40
(I see their Xandros announcement has already hit OSNews, but none of the other distros announced here at TechEd have been mentioned here on OSNews yet -- I wonder if one of them is included on one of the DVDs I got in the ever-growing free DVD stack I have?)
posted by Almafeta on Tue 8th May 2007 02:15
Besides, if posts can be automatically declared 'trollish', shouldn't this be checked before the post is added to the conversation?
posted by Almafeta on Sat 5th May 2007 21:55
The bug only happens in darkened cells. If less than half the cell is visible, the text is visile and then links are clickable, but if the full cell is visible on the screen, the text is invisible (not even through selecting) and the links cannot be clicked.
Not all dark cells suffer this bug, but it does make about 1 in 2 stories unreadable from the front page...
posted by Almafeta on Fri 4th May 2007 18:36
Would any OSNews readers be interested in my writing up a convention report about everything that I saw down there? Of course, there'd be the tasks my job required of me, but beyond that, I can (and will) poke my nose into a little of everything.
posted by Almafeta on Wed 11th Apr 2007 17:47
posted by Almafeta on Thu 5th Apr 2007 03:29


