Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Apr 2008 17:14 UTC, submitted by Dan Warne
Hardware, Embedded Systems "Asus has big plans for its little laptop and to the dismay of purists and Penguinistas, those plans centre on Windows. The company expects to sell five million Eee PCs this year, and Asus CEO Jerry Shen predicts that 'about 60 percent of these' will run XP rather than the Xandros OS with which the mini-note debuted."
Order by: Score:
Only buy linux
by muldy (3) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 17:31 UTC
muldy
Member since:
2008-02-26
Fans: 0

I've already payed the Vista/MS(Not my choice) tax this year.

Linux for me please!

Ripoff XP
by SlackerJack (6.04) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 17:40 UTC
SlackerJack
Member since:
2005-11-12
Fans: 3

$80 extra for XP is disgraceful and on top of that your getting a 7 year old OS with 2001 software.

There are no bounds to Microsoft's greed and the customer loses just like with Vista Ultimate.

RE: Ripoff XP
by Thom_Holwerda (Staff) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 17:53 UTC in reply to "Ripoff XP"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29
Fans: 20

$80 extra for XP is disgraceful and on top of that your getting a 7 year old OS with 2001 software.

There are no bounds to Microsoft's greed and the customer loses just like with Vista Ultimate.


Except... This is Asus' asking price. Not Microsoft's. Asus gets the required OEM licenses MUCH cheaper than 80 USD.

RE[2]: Ripoff XP
by SlackerJack (6.04) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 19:31 UTC in reply to "RE: Ripoff XP"
SlackerJack Member since:
2005-11-12
Fans: 3

Then why are they asking more price for the XP version with a lesser spec, dont tell me MS are giving their licenses away free.

If anything it should be cheaper since XP's support gets pulled in a few months.

Edited 2008-04-14 19:32 UTC

RE: Ripoff XP
by lemur2 (3.92) on Tue 15th Apr 2008 01:59 UTC in reply to "Ripoff XP"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17
Fans: 2

$80 extra for XP is disgraceful and on top of that your getting a 7 year old OS with 2001 software.

There are no bounds to Microsoft's greed and the customer loses just like with Vista Ultimate.


Correction - you get a 7 year old OS with no userland software to speak of for your $80. You also get all the vulnerabilities to a massive array of malware which is already "out there in the wild".

Since it is a new machine, you also have to pay again for a new license all your extra proprietary userland software applications, which is going to end up costing you a whole lot more than $80. Unless of course you use the same FOSS userland applications ... which run on the EEEPC variant with a Linux OS installed anyway.

So ... there is no upside to getting the XP variant. Only downside.

If you do get an EEEPC ... my strong recommendation is to do yourself a big favour and go with the Linux variant.

Edited 2008-04-15 02:10 UTC

Not convinced about the figures...
by weckart (1.8) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 17:40 UTC
weckart
Member since:
2006-01-11
Fans: 0

On the 900 model about to ship WinXP comes with 12GB ssd and Xandros with 20GB. That would persuade enough to buy the Linux version and copy/pirate an existing copy of XP onto it.

RE: Not convinced about the figures...
by leech (3.92) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 18:10 UTC in reply to "Not convinced about the figures..."
leech Member since:
2006-01-10
Fans: 1

Why would you want to put XP on it? Granted, I'd rather put Mandriva or Ubuntu or Debian on it than Xandros, but I wouldn't want XP on it.

RE[2]: Not convinced about the figures...
by buff (3.08) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 19:32 UTC in reply to "RE: Not convinced about the figures..."
buff Member since:
2005-11-12
Fans: 1

Why would you want to put XP on it?

Come one. You should know the answer to that question. Just look at market dominance in the home user and business sectors and you will see that Windows is an easy sell to people. Markets are pretty much blind. They are rules by previous learning and sticking with what is comfortable. If you want to make cash you go after the biggest markets. This is capitalism 101 my friend.

Edited 2008-04-14 19:40 UTC

tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06
Fans: 7

Why would you want to put XP on it?


Perhaps because you can run your current Windows software?

lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17
Fans: 2

"Why would you want to put XP on it?


Perhaps because you can run your current Windows software?
"

Read the EULA for most software that is Windows-only: it will say that you need a new copy of the software to run on a new machine.

So no ... you can't run "your current Windows software" on your new EEEPC ... you would typically have to buy a new copy for non-FOSS software.

For FOSS software such as OpenOffice and Firefox et al ... you can run that on the EEPC with Linux ... you don't need the Windows variant for that.

biffuz Member since:
2006-03-27
Fans: 0

"[q]Why would you want to put XP on it?


Perhaps because you can run your current Windows software?
"

Read the EULA for most software that is Windows-only: it will say that you need a new copy of the software to run on a new machine.

So no ... you can't run "your current Windows software" on your new EEEPC ... [/q]

Before telling someone to read the EULA, you should do it yourself! Most EULAs does NOT say you have to buy a new copy if you buy a new PC, they say the software can be installed on one computer at once. Since most people replace the old computer when buying a new one, they can just delete the software from the old one and install it on the new one.

And there's free and open software for Windows, too. And often it's the same that runs on Linux, so you can get both Windows and Linux software running... just buy Windows.

tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06
Fans: 7

Read the EULA for most software that is Windows-only: it will say that you need a new copy of the software to run on a new machine.


It depends on the EULA but, if I may generalize, most EULAs allow you to run software on one machine at a time. Some EULAs permit you to install the software on more than one machine, as long as you don't use it simultaneously on those machines. The bottom line is that you can't arbitrarily say that all EULAs prevent you from reinstalling software from one machine to another. That's nonsense.

lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17
Fans: 2

"Why would you want to put XP on it?


Perhaps because you can run your current Windows software?
"

If you make it run Windows, then it can only use either FAT or NTFS as the filesystem, which is very much not recommended for flash filesystems.

Explained here:

http://www.osnews.com/permalink?309589

... and here ...

http://www.osnews.com/permalink?309591

You need to run a log-structured filesystem with flash memory SSDs. On Windows, the only log-structured filesystem is UDF, and AFAIK that isn't an option when you install XP to the EEEPC.

Edited 2008-04-15 06:37 UTC

Almafeta Member since:
2007-02-22
Fans: 5

Why would you want to put XP on it?


Because the XP version of the eeePC is the version which isn't pre-loaded with cruft.

A lot of computer manufacturers reduce costs by pre-installing software that gives kickbacks. And the eeePC's pre-loaded software list includes a lot of commercial interests: Google, Mozilla, OpenOffice, Skype, Wikipedia, et al.

If $80 is the tax we have to pay to not have our computers preloaded with dubious 'helpful' software and adverts that we have to spend weeks removing -- if, indeed, they can be removed at all -- then I'll pay that extra $80.

EDIT: Accursed time limit on catching errors.

Edited 2008-04-15 15:34 UTC

jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06
Fans: 0

do you own an eeepc now past it's week of cruft removal? i'd move too mandriva so avoiding the ms tax even for a crufty xandros pre-install would be better for me. it is a seriuos question though as you are the first mention of the eeepc needing a week's worth of cleaning. anyone else out there have xandros crufties too remove on their eeepc?

Do I need one?
by Boldie (2.2) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 18:39 UTC
Boldie
Member since:
2007-03-26
Fans: 0

I'm trying to persuade myself into buying an eeePC. I really want one. But do I need one? I don't travel, I have an ok desktop/HTPC for surfing, "distro-hopping", music and movies. I have a Nokia N800 just for fun.

Why do I need an eeePC?

Maybe I can buy it to get a copy of XP! You know you never know, one day I might need XP and soon I won't be able to buy a copy.

Yes I definitely need XP. Don't I?

RE: Do I need one?
by sonic2000gr (3.44) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 20:05 UTC in reply to "Do I need one?"
sonic2000gr Member since:
2007-05-20
Fans: 0


Why do I need an eeePC?


Easy. You don't NEED an eeePC. You just WANT one! It is called the CGF (Cool & Geeky Factor) ;)

RE[2]: Do I need one?
by viton (2.04) on Tue 15th Apr 2008 08:11 UTC in reply to "RE: Do I need one?"
viton Member since:
2005-08-09
Fans: 0

You don't NEED an eeePC. You just WANT one!

Exactly. I have a nice 13" laptop but I'm thinking of one of these small toys for AROS or Syllable.

RE[2]: Do I need one?
by Boldie (2.2) on Tue 15th Apr 2008 16:19 UTC in reply to "RE: Do I need one?"
Boldie Member since:
2007-03-26
Fans: 0

Excellent! The CFG is good enough, thanks! ;-)

I thought XP was set to EOL....
by bryanv (3.52) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 19:08 UTC
bryanv
Member since:
2005-08-26
Fans: 5

I thought XP was set to be End Of Lifed in the very near future?

So, why would I want to buy one of these when support is about to vanish?

Seems pretty stupid to me, unless Asus knows something the rest of the industry doesn't, but that common sense and flagging Vista sales tell us...

RE: I thought XP was set to EOL....
by andrewg (2.76) on Tue 15th Apr 2008 07:19 UTC in reply to "I thought XP was set to EOL...."
andrewg Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 1

Microsoft is keeping XP alive for devices that have limited processing resources like eePC is such a device.

Comment by SJ87
by SJ87 (2.1) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 20:22 UTC
SJ87
Member since:
2007-12-16
Fans: 0

It sure is sad to see Vista sucking so badly that Microsoft is forced to waste huge amounts of money when trying to develope new versions of XP that could run on machines not designed to run Windows, just because they know "there's no coming back from Linux"...

More XP means more WINE
by destraht (1.67) on Mon 14th Apr 2008 21:11 UTC
destraht
Member since:
2006-08-07
Fans: 0

I'm excited to see more XP systems because it is good for the WINE project. I don't intend on using XP, but I would really hate to see everything go to Vista quickly. If this happens it will mean that new software will start requiring Vista at exactly the time that WINE is able to run most significant programs on XP.

Thus, I'm very happy to see Microsoft dragging its feet and having to use XP.

Long live XP!

Comment by Wombatski
by Wombatski (2) on Tue 15th Apr 2008 08:21 UTC
Wombatski
Member since:
2008-04-15
Fans: 0

What happens when Microsoft stop selling XP in June ?

running XP software on the Asus Eee
by Different (1.08) on Wed 16th Apr 2008 01:54 UTC
Different
Member since:
2007-07-03
Fans: 0

If you need to run Windows software thru your linux Eee PC, you can always use the built in wireless capability and rdesktop to connect to your windows XP Pro machine by using ThinServer XP. That way you do not need to get the XP version

Personally I find the Eee PC screen too small

http://www.aikotech.com/thinserver.htm