Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Mar 2008 23:23 UTC, submitted by Michael Larabel
Fedora Core "Last month we had measured Ubuntu's boot performance via the open-source Bootchart utility and had done this on all Ubuntu releases between Ubuntu 6.06 LTS and the latest development build at the time for Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. From this testing we had found the boot time to decrease with each official release and the maximum disk throughput increasing. With Fedora 9 Sulphur due out next month, we have done this same boot performance testing on the Fedora side with Core 4, Core 5, Core 6, 7, 8, and 9 Rawhide."
Order by: Score:
Readahead?
by sbergman27 (4.64) on Tue 11th Mar 2008 23:53 UTC
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24
Fans: 33

I noticed, yesterday, that readahead was not in the default install for my Fedora 8 machines. Looking at the boot charts, it looks like 8 and 9 do not use it. Anyone have info on the rationale? It was always a bit of a hack. But my understanding was that it *did* help.

RE: Readahead?
by Ford Prefect (3.32) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 00:01 UTC in reply to "Readahead?"
Ford Prefect Member since:
2006-01-16
Fans: 6
RE[2]: Readahead?
by Ford Prefect (3.32) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 00:02 UTC in reply to "RE: Readahead?"
Ford Prefect Member since:
2006-01-16
Fans: 6

I intended to post this on top level and not as a reply. Sorry for the inconvenience.

RE[2]: Readahead?
by Blackhouse (2) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 06:59 UTC in reply to "RE: Readahead?"
Blackhouse Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

That's pretty ancient though (2005?), you should make and up to date one ;)

RE[2]: Readahead?
by da_Chicken (2.4) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 12:00 UTC in reply to "RE: Readahead?"
da_Chicken Member since:
2006-01-01
Fans: 1

I tried ArchLinux about two months ago and the boot time was slower than in most distros because loading udev uevents took almost a minute to finish. I checked the ArchLinux forums and it appears that a lot of users have experienced the same issue, especially those whose computer is a bit old.

RE[3]: Readahead?
by Ford Prefect (3.32) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 12:41 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Readahead?"
Ford Prefect Member since:
2006-01-16
Fans: 6

You can disable UDEV autodetect and write the needed modules into the config file.

Other than that, you are right. UDEV autodetect became a serious bottleneck on Arch boot.

RE[4]: Readahead?
by broch (1.8) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 15:43 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Readahead?"
broch Member since:
2006-05-04
Fans: 0

shrug,
udev has nothing to do with Arch boot problems.
udev events is causing problems.
You can disable udev events but this will cause boot problems once in a while.

Safer option is to try udev/module-init-tools/initscripts from Arch testing repository.
You need to know what are you doing and you need to remember that these packages are from testing.
The above should speed up default Arch boot time. On system tweaked already this will not have much of impact on boot time.

on HP laptop with SATA 5400RPM/1GB RAM I am getting 21-23s with Arch/KDE and custom kernel 2.6.24-zen4.
Of course faster disk better timing. Of course booting to cli would be much faster.

In general kernel and linux software tend to slow down but distros put extra glue to slow things down even more.

RE: Readahead?
by VistaUser (3.3) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 00:09 UTC in reply to "Readahead?"
VistaUser Member since:
2008-03-08
Fans: 0

It actually slowed things down.

Alpha slower?
by Bitterman (3.16) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 03:48 UTC
Bitterman
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

I'm not sure but wouldn't a test be slower because of all the debug flags set? I mean there is going to be alot of code running to catch verbose output right?

A couple of notes
by giallu (1) on Wed 12th Mar 2008 09:49 UTC
giallu
Member since:
2006-11-08
Fans: 0

Bootchart _is_ in the fedora repo, so "yum install bootchart" is just enough to have it installed.

At a quick inspection, I did not find in the Ubuntu review which version they installed. If it was the LiveCD, they should make a comparison with the Fedora one because the default services list is very diverse.

A little off topic
by vikramsharma (1.28) on Thu 13th Mar 2008 16:59 UTC
vikramsharma
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

I read about ext4 implementation in Fedora 9, wouldn't that affect boot up time, stability, operation performance of various apps. Just wanted to know about changes in performance we can expect from ext4 file system.

Edited 2008-03-13 17:00 UTC