Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 11th Oct 2007 21:43 UTC, submitted by Jeremy LaCroix
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu The release candidate for Ubuntu 7.10 has been released. "The Ubuntu developers are hurrying to bring you the absolute latest and greatest software that the open source and free software communities have to offer. This is the Ubuntu 7.10 release candidate, which brings a host of excellent new features. We consider this release candidate to be complete, stable and suitable for testing by any user. The final stable version will be released in October 2007."
Order by: Score:
Nice work!
by gothic (1.2) on Thu 11th Oct 2007 21:50 UTC
gothic
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

I'll download it in AMD64 version for my laptop to do some tests and report bugs :-)

Thanks all Ubuntu Team!

www.GetDeb.net has now also Gutsy packages.

Looks good
by pllb (2.4) on Thu 11th Oct 2007 22:23 UTC
pllb
Member since:
2007-04-30
Fans: 0

Looks like a better release than the previous, but I'll be sticking with my Debian install. It should be noted that this new printer stuff in this release is taken from Fedora. But it's nice to finally see the Ubuntu team tackling some of the security issues..I've been seeing rants about it for years on the forums.

Edited 2007-10-11 22:26

RE: Looks good
by Rahul (4) on Thu 11th Oct 2007 22:39 UTC in reply to "Looks good"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 6

As someone involved with Fedora for a long time, I can say this and when I do I believe I am speaking for everyone in the Fedora community that I am happy that Ubuntu is taking things from Fedora like desktop effects preferences and system-config-printer and that they are interested in doing that more and we go out of our way including changing our infrastructure to enable them to do exactly that

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg022...

A number of innovations (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RedHatContributions) from Fedora constantly go into other distributions and Fedora has a strong upstream focus (http://fedoraprojecct.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream) that is specifically geared towards this. Just a while back I noticed that Mandriva's latest release had some Udev changes that they acknowledged as being from Fedora which is great.

The latest OpenSUSE, Debian etc ship Fedora's virtualization related tools too and practically everybody is including things like the HAL, DBus, NetworkManager etc along with recently Iced Tea which is a competely Free derivative of OpenJDK created originally for Fedora.

This is not a one way street. Ubuntu adopting system-config-printer got Fedora a number of bug fixes which saves time and effort for everybody. So take what you will and share the changes if you can. This is Free software at it's best. Have fun.

RE[2]: Looks good
by HangLoose (2.12) on Thu 11th Oct 2007 22:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Looks good"
HangLoose Member since:
2007-09-03
Fans: 1

More or less like the "idea" of one-single-cd-distribution that is now adopted by the major distributions...

Spins - Fedora
Gnome/KDE - openSuse
Even Indiana to openSolaris...

Thats the beauty of open source... ;)

RE[3]: Looks good
by Rahul (4) on Thu 11th Oct 2007 22:52 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Looks good"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 6

The single CD distribution idea existed long long back. I believe Mepis did it way before the rest and it might even not be the first and Fedora spins are not just single CD distributions.

Take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CustomSpins and read the referneces to understand what spins are all about.

Edited 2007-10-11 22:58

RE[3]: Looks good
by AdamW (3.32) on Thu 11th Oct 2007 23:49 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Looks good"
AdamW Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 10

The first major distro to do this (a single CD hybrid live / install edition) was Mepis. The second was Mandriva (with One). The third, AFAIK, was Ubuntu.

RE[4]: Looks good
by da_Chicken (2.44) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 00:00 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Looks good"
da_Chicken Member since:
2006-01-01
Fans: 1

The first major distro to do this (a single CD hybrid live / install edition) was Mepis.

Knoppix did this long, long before Mepis.

RE[4]: Looks good
by bornagainenguin (2.64) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 01:27 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Looks good"
bornagainenguin Member since:
2005-08-07
Fans: 5

I think people are forgetting about Ark Linux and Corel Linux who also offered one cd installs with best of breed either around the same time or before...

Does it really matter who was first?

To me the beauty of open sourceGPL is no matter who goes first we all reap the benefits! Well that and the knowledge that with Open SourceGPL you know there's a good chance anything good is likely to survive or be resurrectable... How many closed source projects or OSes have managed to come back from the dead?

--bornagainpenguin

Gutsy isn't Bad
by Peter Besenbruch (2.68) on Thu 11th Oct 2007 22:51 UTC
Peter Besenbruch
Member since:
2006-03-13
Fans: 2

It's certainly better than Feisty on an Asus Z3300 laptop. Things like resume from hibernation work better (i.e. the machine runs at full speed now), and sound works (it quit under Feisty after an update).

I'm running the Kubuntu version. It's a simple, blah KDE desktop, and that's a good thing.

Debian unfortunately won't let me turn the built in wireless on. KDE on Debian ran rings around Feisty. It's still a little faster than Gutsy, but the differences are far smaller.

Gutsy is the first Ubuntu release that I actually like.

Installed it on a friend's laptop yesterday...
by archiesteel (3.68) on Thu 11th Oct 2007 23:31 UTC
archiesteel
Member since:
2005-07-02
Fans: 23

I was really surprised at how easy it was to install ATI and Broadcom Wireless support. The entire desktop is also well-integrated - all in all a very good distribution.

There is one problem, however, and unfortunately it seems it won't get solved quickly: suspend/hibernate does not work if you use the fglrx driver (something to do with SLAB vs. SLUB support, whatever that is), and apparently the Ubuntu devs can't fix it on their end. We'll just hope that the next ATI driver (8.42.X) will solve this issue, in the meantime if one has a laptop with ATI chipset, one must choose between 3D acceleration and suspend/hibernate... ;)

bornagainenguin Member since:
2005-08-07
Fans: 5

Do you know if they managed to fix ATI Radeon Mobility 7500 support?

Over on the launchpad they were reporting constant issues and breaks with the teams rushing fixed upstream as quickly as they could for release time, and just as they would report a fix someone would report it being broken by another patch for something different...

--bornagainpenguin (who has tried the Herd releases and the RC but is not willing to risk a working install again at this point...)

joelito_pr Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 0

I had problems with a radeon but it turned out to be a misconfiguration in my BIOS. It didn't happened before because the previous versions of XOrg ignored those settings.

Edited 2007-10-12 02:22

steogede2 Member since:
2007-08-17
Fans: 0

>> one must choose between 3D acceleration and suspend/hibernate... ;)

I don't think I have ever got either working on my laptop using Ubuntu (I get 3D working under SUSE) - hopefully 7.10 will be different.

Order it Now for Free!
by gothic (1.2) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 00:10 UTC
gothic
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

If someone wants a Gutsy CD for Free, pre-order it at https://shipit.ubuntu.com

Delta ISOs?
by sb56637 (3.36) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 04:24 UTC
sb56637
Member since:
2006-05-11
Fans: 0

Any way Ubuntu devs could be convinced to provide delta ISOs for the final version? I'd like to test the RC, but I have very limited bandwidth and don't want to waste it on a RC.

Edited 2007-10-12 04:27

RE: Delta ISOs?
by ba1l (2.96) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 11:31 UTC in reply to "Delta ISOs?"
ba1l Member since:
2007-09-08
Fans: 0

If you only want to install on one machine, you can just upgrade to the release version from the installed system.

For the Live CD, it's impossible to provide a delta between the RC and final images, because of the way the data on the live CD is compressed.

For the alternate install CDs, you can use Jigdo to build a new CD image from the RC and the newest packages. This way, you can download only the changed files.

Same as always
by garymax (2.2) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 04:59 UTC
garymax
Member since:
2006-01-23
Fans: 0

Just tried out the RC on a spare machine. Took longer than usual to install. By comparison, VectorLinux 5.8 SOHO installed in 10 minutes--or 1/2 the time.

Give me a lightweight but robust system any day. I'll be sticking with Slackware 12.

v RE: Same as always
by richp (-1) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 05:23 UTC in reply to "Same as always"
v RE[2]: Same as always
by garymax (2.2) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 05:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Same as always"
RE[3]: Same as always
by superstoned (2.84) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 12:17 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Same as always"
superstoned Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 3

Well, it depends on what you're looking for, I guess. I will NEVER go back to a distro without a rolling release schedule, ever. I can't stand not being able to compile stuff because there hasn't been a stable release with the needed library yet, even though the library itself is completely stable.

Take a look at Ubuntu - they sync with Debian Testing (between a week and 2 months old software) then stabilise it and release it with some updated enduser software (X, KDE/Gnome). You use it 6 months, then there's an update.

During these six months, you start out with software at least 6 months old, so you're behind on the latest STABLE(!) development in the linux world somewhere between 6 and 14 months. That's 10 months behind on average for the lower-level stuff. I wouldn't be happy with that.

Of course, it's fine for many end users and companies... I guess...

RE[4]: Same as always
by deb2006 (2) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 12:41 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Same as always"
deb2006 Member since:
2006-06-26
Fans: 0

I might be a bit retarded, but is this in favour or against Ubuntu??? I always thought Ubuntu has a rolling release schedule ...

And what does "stable" really mean? Once Gnome releases, say, Gnome 3.0, it's stable. And tho it's considered "stable", it takes weeks/months to appear in distributions like Gentoo or Arch. With Ubuntu you know it'll be released in 10 and 04 (well, mostly). And Debian releases when it's finished altho I see promising signs of a changed attitude.

320 MB of RAM?
by lukic (1.14) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 06:46 UTC
lukic
Member since:
2006-09-23
Fans: 0

They say that you now need 320 MB of RAM to install from a LiveCD. Is this true? I got 256 and that use to be more than enough for earlier versions.

Browser: Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.0.8993/58; U; en)

v RE: 320 MB of RAM?
by Anonymo (1) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 07:05 UTC in reply to "320 MB of RAM?"
RE: 320 MB of RAM?
by Benjamin_Lebsanft (2.32) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 07:36 UTC in reply to "320 MB of RAM?"
Benjamin_Lebsanft Member since:
2005-10-11
Fans: 0

My laptop has 256MB too and while earlier versions wouldn't install at all, gutsy (was alpha6 iirc) now just takes a day ;)

RE[2]: 320 MB of RAM?
by ashigabou (1.84) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 10:46 UTC in reply to "RE: 320 MB of RAM?"
ashigabou Member since:
2005-11-11
Fans: 0

Why not using the alternate CD for configuration with limited amount of memory ? This uses a text-based installer, and does not require a lot of memory (128 Mb is definitely enough, maybe 64 would do, not sure though, since I have never ubuntu on this configuration). You can also try the server install.

Ubuntu should be perfectly usable with 256 Mb, once installed. Firefox is always a problem, unfortunately, but a basic desktop (with a few removed applets) takes much less than 100 Mb on Gutsy (I noticed gutsy takes less space so far).

RE: 320 MB of RAM?
by porcel (6.56) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 11:57 UTC in reply to "320 MB of RAM?"
porcel Member since:
2006-01-28
Fans: 2

Nonsense, I have installed Ubuntu Feisty on computers with only 256MB of RAM just fine.

RE: 320 MB of RAM?
by sb56637 (3.36) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 14:47 UTC in reply to "320 MB of RAM?"
sb56637 Member since:
2006-05-11
Fans: 0

I haven't tried Gutsy yet, but I used to install from Ubuntu live CDs on machines with 128 MB of RAM. Wasn't fast, but it worked.

Edited 2007-10-12 14:54 UTC

how much RAM will it need ??
by mmu_man (2.72) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 09:38 UTC
mmu_man
Member since:
2006-09-30
Fans: 6

I tried yesterday to install 7.04, but it spun the CD for an hour trying to load a desktop...
I have 192M that should be more than enough, at least it is for Debian and BeOS ;)

RE: how much RAM will it need ??
by porcel (6.56) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 11:58 UTC in reply to "how much RAM will it need ??"
porcel Member since:
2006-01-28
Fans: 2

Use the alternate CD installer just like you do in Debian.

RE[2]: how much RAM will it need ??
by mmu_man (2.72) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 12:58 UTC in reply to "RE: how much RAM will it need ??"
mmu_man Member since:
2006-09-30
Fans: 6

I never had to use an alternate CD for debian, netinst worked just fine. (who needs gui anyway)

RE[3]: how much RAM will it need ??
by porcel (6.56) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 20:34 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: how much RAM will it need ??"
porcel Member since:
2006-01-28
Fans: 2

Ubuntu's alternate CD is debian's normal installer, i.e., the ncurses one.

RAM
by lukic (1.14) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 10:00 UTC
lukic
Member since:
2006-09-23
Fans: 0

For 7.04 to install from a LiveCD you need 192 MB of RAM. I have 256 and I it took for 7.04 less than 20 minutes to finish installation on my pc. You can always use alternative CD to install Ubuntu because it needs less RAM.

Browser: Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.0.8993/58; U; en)

RE: RAM
by mmu_man (2.72) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 10:42 UTC in reply to "RAM"
mmu_man Member since:
2006-09-30
Fans: 6

Well maybe there was something else, but it really sat there for more than an hour, trying to start nautilus...
hopefully 7.10 will work better ;)

With AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ it seems slow ...
by deb2006 (2) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 12:30 UTC
deb2006
Member since:
2006-06-26
Fans: 0

... and that's kind of really, really silly. Yeah, sure: great eye candy, but the price for that is much too high. I'll go back to Debian. Or Slackware, come to think of ;)

merkoth Member since:
2006-09-22
Fans: 1

Wow, my Athlon X2 3800+, with just 512 mb RAM seems to handle Gutsy (eye candy included) just fine :S

I've been running Gutsy for two weeks now and, so far, it works great. Compiz still has its fair a mount of glitches/annoyances, but running it along with the new Clearlooks gives a pretty cool-looking desktop. I'd like to see a better "Human" theme though.

Gutsy itself feels fast and stable, I didn't notice major speed differences with Feisty, and that's a good thing in my books. Tracker search seems to be less of a resource hog than I expected (most of the time you won't notice it's there).

I'll update to RC as soo as I get home ;)

apoclypse Member since:
2007-02-17
Fans: 1

Tracker is great. When I used Beagle I would generally turn it off because their was a noticeable shift in resources when it was indexing. As of gutsy, I hardley eve remember that tracker is running at all. Its very resource conscious and its slim and fast. This is what and indexing system should be, beagle was always a bad idea in my mind.

ba1l Member since:
2007-09-08
Fans: 0

Erm... If the eye candy is slow, the problem is NOT your CPU. It's the graphics card, or drivers.

Try disabling the stuff (In the "Appearance" config applet). Should help.

sad
by cg0def (2.12) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 14:36 UTC
cg0def
Member since:
2006-02-12
Fans: 0

isn't the RC kinda late? I though it would be out by now? I kinda wish Ubuntu was as punctual as openSUSE ...

RE: sad
by spikeb (2.68) on Sat 13th Oct 2007 07:18 UTC in reply to "sad"
spikeb Member since:
2006-01-18
Fans: 1

no, it's on time as scheduled. and opensuse took ten months between 10.2 and 10.3

Still no Intel HD audio support :(
by gdanko (1.44) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 16:17 UTC
gdanko
Member since:
2005-07-15
Fans: 0

I had to rebuild the kernel to get Intel HD Audio working. But the downside to this is that I can no longer use the "restricted" drivers. With that said, I also cannot install the Nvidia drivers from the Nvidia site as they bomb. Sigh. Either no sound or no dual monitor support on a Latitude 630.

RE: Still no Intel HD audio support :(
by theine (2.2) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 16:43 UTC in reply to "Still no Intel HD audio support :("
theine Member since:
2005-09-29
Fans: 0

Either no sound or no dual monitor support on a Latitude 630.

This is gonna get fixed, see:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131133

gdanko Member since:
2005-07-15
Fans: 0

Sweet. I have sound!

AdamW Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 10

there's several zillion varieties of the HDA codec, each of which requires tweaks in ALSA. so every time some company releases a new laptop with a different implementation of HDA, ALSA has to get tweaked. it's a nightmare for distributors.

I'm looking forward to test-driving
by deathshadow (2.8) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 18:09 UTC
deathshadow
Member since:
2005-07-12
Fans: 4

Download in progress - the big thing I'm hoping for is better support when going PAST two monitors with different cards. I've got a Ge7600GS in here driving a my right monitor and a Ge8800GTS driving my center and left displays - and in linux I cannot get that extra 17" working right (if at all) even with the binary drivers.

ANY improvement in the monitor setup features to make me not have to go nutzo google-fu playing with xorg.conf - only to repeatedly crash X...

We'll see. Fiesty was DAMNED close. (I could get it working if I moved the center display to the 7600 - NOT entirely what I wanted)

Widescreen support
by Dubbayoo (1.92) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 18:33 UTC
Dubbayoo
Member since:
2006-02-09
Fans: 0

Does it install via the GUI using a widescreen monitor? I tried installing one of the betas and I couldn't get in the gui. Perhaps thats more an Xorg thing?

boff
by flojlg (1.7) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 21:37 UTC
flojlg
Member since:
2007-01-11
Fans: 0

After 3 or 4 Ubuntu in a row, I begin to be really bored with this distro.
Since a long time nothing really exiting comes out to us distract from "Next time you will get...." I heard this too long from another "$"ystem.
Of course it works, of course the devs are tip-top, of course it's a solid distrib, but and there is a but: what else ? nothing or so few, people coming to the Linux world expect a bit more fantasy or creativity.
Just tell me why I fell so bored, it's maybe just an impression that gutsy is just a feisty + or a debian ++ ?...

RE: boff
by Dubbayoo (1.92) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 22:19 UTC in reply to "boff"
Dubbayoo Member since:
2006-02-09
Fans: 0

You tell us why you're so bored? What other OS has these "exciting changes" you speak of?

RE[2]: boff
by flojlg (1.7) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 23:14 UTC in reply to "RE: boff"
flojlg Member since:
2007-01-11
Fans: 0

And your next question will be
This distrib don't have this or that so why you change ?
As I have to explain ...
No I won't, because I express an opinion and after a large support to Ubuntu I don't feel excited any more, that's it.
I have recently installed a Debian unstable and saw not much difference, but a better performance, and no special tool that I don't get there, so what's the point ? Why so much about Ubuntu? Now the egg or the hen witch one came first I don't care.
Just to point that a lot is said about Ubuntu, but after 4 release they all look the same.
just one point by distro :suse have yast, mandriva draktools, debian apt-get, redhat-fedora...and so on Ubuntu have c,e,k,x etc buntu like a long movie without a star, or a story...
Is that enough ?

RE[3]: boff
by merkoth (3.56) on Sat 13th Oct 2007 00:40 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: boff"
merkoth Member since:
2006-09-22
Fans: 1

Fair enough. But I guess you picked the wrong distro: Ubuntu is targeted to those who need a simple and stable desktop OS. It's supposed to "just work".

Anyway, why don't you try getting involved and suggesting those "exciting features" you want?

RE: boff
by Cymro (2.72) on Sat 13th Oct 2007 14:06 UTC in reply to "boff"
Cymro Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 0

This is the biggest release of Ubuntu as long as I've been using it. The last release was good for its codec handling and, for me, read/write HFS+. You might be bored by it, but it tipped the balance for me to make it my primary OS.

I'm particularly excited about this next release - Compiz, X-Windows config, metadata search, better printing, slimming down the preferences apps - those are all things you'll benefit from immediately.

A little, rarely mentioned thing like read/write NTFS might be all some users need to stop booting their Windows partition after Feisty.

Still hesitating
by dada1958 (1.8) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 21:49 UTC
dada1958
Member since:
2007-08-30
Fans: 0

For the first time since Ubuntu 5.04 I hesitate to upgrade; my Athlon 64 X2 3800+ desktop with Feisty Fawn runs so wonderfully well on it.

Seems okay...mostly
by bousozoku (2.96) on Fri 12th Oct 2007 22:24 UTC
bousozoku
Member since:
2006-01-23
Fans: 0

I downloaded and installed 7.10 over a period of about 5 hours, using an EV-DO connected mobile phone, and that included a quick power outage.

The update manager seemed to duplicate some steps in full but started at the proper file in the list apparently.

I got a warning that I needed to install restricted drivers not supported by Ubuntu for the 3D functionality (nVidia 7600GS) but I don't see any difference in the desktop.

After I powered down, the machine hung with a Network Manager problem.

It seems very stable for a release candidate, though.

...the next release....
by cmost (4.8) on Sat 13th Oct 2007 02:01 UTC
cmost
Member since:
2006-07-16
Fans: 0

I don't know why everyone is so geeked for the release of 7.10. As everyone should realize by now, Ubuntu is an African word that apparently means "anticipation." A stable version will drop and almost immediately hype will begin for the "next big one." In fact, many users will add the repos for the next release almost immediately. I'm about sick of this myself (even though I'm technically an Ubuntu user as a user of Linux Mint.) The devs need to work on bug fixes and stability before adding reams of new features that work half-assed for some people and not at all for others. I would be happy to see Ubuntu move to a once-a-year release schedule and backport updated (and stabilized) packages into the stable version.

RE: ...the next release....
by netpython (2.6) on Sat 13th Oct 2007 05:22 UTC in reply to "...the next release...."
netpython Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 4

Than don't feel the urge to upgrade. Nobody is forcing you. Personally the prime is the kernel and i allways stay in sync with the most current tree. Other than that i don't give the rats ass about what version the userland apps have as long as security fixes and or patches have been applied.

RE: ...the next release....
by siride (4.8) on Sat 13th Oct 2007 15:00 UTC in reply to "...the next release...."
siride Member since:
2006-01-02
Fans: 0

You mention the biggest pet-peeve of mine with Ubuntu (well, one of them). You can't use newer packages without upgrading to the next version of the distro. That is the most back-asswards system I could think of. There's really no excuse for it.

RE[2]: ...the next release....
by jaylaa (4.48) on Sat 13th Oct 2007 15:02 UTC in reply to "RE: ...the next release...."
jaylaa Member since:
2006-01-17
Fans: 1

http://www.getdeb.net

Edited 2007-10-13 15:03