Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Tue 26th Jun 2007 23:31 UTC, submitted by Chris from Apple
Apple A number of iPhone reviews were released today on the net: NYTimes, WSJ, MSNBC and USAToday. All seem to agree that the iPhone is a worthy device with few flaws.
Order by: Score:
I'm amazed!
by exigentsky (2.56) on Tue 26th Jun 2007 23:43 UTC
exigentsky
Member since:
2005-07-09
Fans: 1

I'm not at all surprised that the iPhone is living up to the hype. It seems like a great device. But it seems out of character for Apple to give copies to reviewers before the actual release. Maybe Apple's letting go of its secrecy, or maybe they're just learning to make exceptions.

RE: I'm amazed!
by Eugenia (Staff) on Tue 26th Jun 2007 23:47 UTC in reply to "I'm amazed!"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28
Fans: 15

It is not out of character. The iPhone was announced months ago. If they had never announced, THEN it would be out of character to see reviews before the release.

RE: I'm amazed!
by vimh (3) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 16:13 UTC in reply to "I'm amazed!"
vimh Member since:
2006-02-04
Fans: 2

Is it living up to the hype? To be honest, I really want one but I'll wait and see how the 2.0 version is.

Let's set aside the desire to write applications for the iPhone. It kinda sounds like it's major failing at this point is that it's not a great cell phone.

Sounds like everything else is pretty cool. I'm sure somebody I know will get one so I'll be able to get a look at it some time in the near future.

So what?
by Chicken Blood (2.08) on Tue 26th Jun 2007 23:45 UTC
Chicken Blood
Member since:
2005-12-21
Fans: 0

"All seem to agree that the iPhone is a worthy device with few flaws."

Do you think that's going to stop them?
Stand by while the Apple-bashers get in line to to slag off a device they haven't even used yet :-)

RE: So what?
by raver31 (4.04) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 12:31 UTC in reply to "So what?"
raver31 Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 13

***YAWN***


So, people can never have a genuine gripe against Apple, or they are Apple-bashers ?


Stand by while the Apple Fanbois think it is the best thing since sliced bread and how they will queue for 2 weeks at the shops to buy the first one on the shelves.

RE: So what?
by polaris20 (3.12) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 13:15 UTC in reply to "So what?"
polaris20 Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

"All seem to agree that the iPhone is a worthy device with few flaws."

Do you think that's going to stop them?
Stand by while the Apple-bashers get in line to to slag off a device they haven't even used yet :-)


I agree, and I'm not even an Apple fanboy (don't own a Mac, have an iPod but that's it).

Sadly the bashers of Apple are just as stubborn as the defenders, and it's unlikely either will budge any time soon.

Still, I don't think people should be modding you down for what you said, as you didn't insult anyone, and it was not off-topic.

Guys, how about following the rules about mod points, and not just modding people down because you don't agree with them?

Hmm...
by Almafeta (3.44) on Tue 26th Jun 2007 23:45 UTC
Almafeta
Member since:
2007-02-22
Fans: 5

Personally, I still think it's the Apple nGage. I'll wait to pass judgement until I see some less biased sources of reviews (like OSnews), or better yet, friend reviews.

RE: Hmm...
by godawful (2.32) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:10 UTC in reply to "Hmm..."
godawful Member since:
2005-06-29
Fans: 0

Yes, no one at any of those place are capable of writing a non-biased review, they are all apple shills & fanbois!

I'm pleased that most reviews seem to be saying the keyboard is a non-issue. I'm also displeased that Edge sucks as much as I imagined. Overall, i think it sounds like an alright 1.0 product, I'm sure software upgrades will add a couple features and fix a few bugs. I imagine most everything else that needs fixed or features will only be in 2.0.. much like everyone else's speculation.

For me, this is certainly an issue of "want" over "need", I have a craptacular RAZR right now that I've been wanting to ditch since I got it (for free). I can afford it, but I'm also thinking about the future, how will resell with it work? I'd like to get the 4 gig to tide me over till version 2.0 comes out, and unload my 4 gig, who knows how that will work.. I imagine I can wait on this for at least a little while.

Edited for spelling

Edited 2007-06-27 00:12

RE[2]: Hmm...
by tryphcycle (0.04) on Thu 28th Jun 2007 19:25 UTC in reply to "RE: Hmm..."
tryphcycle Member since:
2006-02-16
Fans: 1

"they are all apple shills & fanbois! "

LOL... as opposed to you being an MS slug and Co**Sucker? Hummmm?

I love the fact that is new iPod-Mac-OSX cellphone thingie is standing EVERY on there head!

RE: Hmm...
by google_ninja (3.44) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:12 UTC in reply to "Hmm..."
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05
Fans: 13

OSNews didn't write the reviews, the New York Times, Wallstreet Journal, MSNBC, and USAToday wrote the reviews. Considering all the anticipation over this device (NYT says 11,000 print articles, and 69 million hits on the site), and the fact that pretty much every reviewer says it sets the bar for next-gen phones, I would say that chances are it will be the next iPod, not the next nGuage. But thats just me...

RE: Hmm...
by Kroc (5.32) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 08:19 UTC in reply to "Hmm..."
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10
Fans: 14

But you can't play any games on the iPhone, nor remove the battery to put them in :B

So it's OK then
by moleskine (4.12) on Tue 26th Jun 2007 23:51 UTC
moleskine
Member since:
2005-11-05
Fans: 5

But even in version 1.0, the iPhone is still the most sophisticated, outlook-changing piece of electronics to come along in years. It does so many things so well, and so pleasurably, that you tend to forgive its foibles. David Pogue in the NYT.

Apple doesn't have to produce the greatest phone in the universe by some Platonic standard, just a phone that is "good enough" by Apple's own high standards. From the sound of these reviews, they've done that. Even so, the absurd hype around the iPhone is bound to return and bite Apple on the ass, imho. Their stock price is overvalued, arguably, and unless they sell huge quantities of the iPhone the naysayers are sure to claim that a falling stock price and less than stellar financials suggest a failure of some kind.

The reality is probably that Apple will do perfectly well with the iPhone by any rational, non-hype assessment, establishing the iPhone as a decent brand and protecting their dominance of the portable music market with this next-generation device. Still, the company likes to live by PR and spin, and this time Apple may end up getting hurty by them. Either way, we'll soon find out.

RE: So it's OK then
by tryphcycle (0.04) on Thu 28th Jun 2007 19:23 UTC in reply to "So it's OK then"
tryphcycle Member since:
2006-02-16
Fans: 1

"Their stock price is overvalued"

Yea... right bra! its final caught up to apples value! the only people that think is over valued are apple haters!

lets talk in 1 year.... and we will se wether is overvalued or not!

My money (literally) is going LONG on apple!

All but one of the flaws are acceptible
by captrb (2) on Tue 26th Jun 2007 23:55 UTC
captrb
Member since:
2005-09-16
Fans: 0

All of the flaws sound tolerable. In fact, it sounds like the perfect solution to an astounding number of my problems. Except for one thing...

I can't write even simple application for it. It's a dead box. If I can't write scripts and do network(SSH) operations (I would take ANY language), then it is useless to me.

Now I'll have to accept the Blackberry that work wants me to carry.

Almafeta Member since:
2007-02-22
Fans: 5

How can you seriously expect to write applications for it? It's a phone.

Luminair Member since:
2007-03-30
Fans: 1

what

nanobaka Member since:
2006-03-16
Fans: 0

What are you talking about? People have been writing applications for Windows Mobile based smartphones for a long time. Don't tell me they are not phones.

Edited 2007-06-27 01:34

HeLfReZ Member since:
2005-08-12
Fans: 0

Maybe I'm missing the sarcasm..but its very conceivable for him to write apps for just about every other phone...and definately "smartphone" on the market...except this one lol. Devkits anyone? Wouldnt do much good though because the bigger issue is really how much ssh work would you want to do with a touch screen keyboard...

HOWEVER..this is Apple, the land of the perpetual device revision..I givem 6months before we see the "iBoard"..YOU Heard it HERE FIRST!! lay the phone on the top of a bluetooth keyboard in landscape mode, bluetooth enabled of course...and it will probably be clear or black with silver trimmings...

Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26
Fans: 3

"

How can you seriously expect to write applications for it? It's a phone.
"

Have you even used a phone in the last decade?

BTW, It's a smartphone (ie contending with XDAs and the lark) ;)
Too many people confuse the iPhone as a mobile-phone competing with the bog standard Nokias, Samsungs etc

zetsurin Member since:
2006-06-13
Fans: 0

If it's just a phone then why would anyone with a brain pay $600 for it.

I find the parallels between this and the PS3 amusing. The PS3 was bashed to death on price (it IS very nice hardware like the iPhone is by the way) with everyone trolling about showing how the (cheaper) Wii is outselling it.

But now when the reverse situation applies, the web 2.0 fart sniffing brigade no doubt won't want to hear that it's even more expensive than the PS3 (no contracts, no $175 termination fee if you don't like it) and it will be massively outsold by cheaper devices.

vimh Member since:
2006-02-04
Fans: 2

As the Apple marketing machine has gone to great lengths to tell us, it's not just a phone. So yeah, I expect to write applications for it. The fact that I cannot is a deal breaker.

flav2000 Member since:
2006-02-08
Fans: 0

I will reserve judgment for later when I get to play around with the phone myself.

but.. "All of the flaws sound tolerable?"

That sounds like what somebody would say about his new boyfriend/girlfriend. I wonder though - most people who say something like this end up not being able to tolerate the flaws rather quickly.

Encouraged
by bsharitt (2.16) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:00 UTC
bsharitt
Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 0

These reviews and a relativly affordable $60 starting price for plans does have me very interested. The only really big thing is EDGE. I would really like 3G especially since I'll be in an are with excellent Sprint coverage, but unfortuantly Sprint doen't have many phones I'm particulary interested in(though that's subject to change by the end of the year if Palm releases next gen Linux based Treos). I have till August befoe I get back to the states before I make a descision, but these good review are making the choice tougher. I guess I'll have to wait until "real" people weigh in.

RE: Encouraged
by binarycrusader (3.6) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:15 UTC in reply to "Encouraged"
binarycrusader Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 3

3g ain't that great either -- at least on AT&T's network. It's certainly a lot faster then Edge -- when it works that is.

I have a 3G Cingular Sync (Samsung A707) and while it can be fast sometimes, usually browsing is a "connection failed. retry again?" experience.

Their network sucks.

I can't even begin to count the number of times they've dropped my calls -- and that's when talking to people on AT&T's network!

Edited 2007-06-27 00:15 UTC

RE[2]: Encouraged
by bsharitt (2.16) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:23 UTC in reply to "RE: Encouraged"
bsharitt Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 0

3g ain't that great either -- at least on AT&T's network. It's certainly a lot faster then Edge -- when it works that is.


That's really the problem. Nice phone but crappy network at AT&T and good network(at least in my area) but no great phones at Sprint.

RE[3]: Encouraged
by nhubbard (1.7) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 12:11 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Encouraged"
nhubbard Member since:
2006-10-03
Fans: 0

I also have a Cingular Sync (A 707), but I wouldn't bash the network (too much). Why? My wife's RAZR (same network) consistently has a connection when my phone sitting next to it does not. I literally have to keep my Samsung in the window of my house to get any connection at all. Yes, I live in the country, but my old Nokia (also cingular) never had any problems, and my wife's motorola can be used just fine without any ridiculous measures. I'm sorry, but at some point you have to take the phone itself into consideration. Maybe the network sucks, but the A707 makes it suck even more. I should have got the RAZR myself. I actually miss my 4 year old cell phone, regardless of all the features on my new one.

RE[2]: Encouraged
by sbenitezb (3.08) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 01:06 UTC in reply to "RE: Encouraged"
sbenitezb Member since:
2005-07-22
Fans: 2

I'm waiting for internet phones, with wi-fi or wimax transport, no more cell phone operators.

RE[3]: Encouraged
by raver31 (4.04) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 12:26 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Encouraged"
raver31 Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 13

You waiting was over long ago, have a look at the Nokia N95 for example

RE[2]: Encouraged
by ThawkTH (3.36) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 03:31 UTC in reply to "RE: Encouraged"
ThawkTH Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 1

I was living in Chicago for several months with a Blackberry Pearl and Tmobile's EDGE network.

While it wasn't extremely fast, I think it's fast enough for the average user. Youtube H.264 might be a bit too much though. Google maps and AJAX applications should work pretty well. Heck, when I was waiting for Comcast I synced the phone with my roommate's IMac and used it as a modem. No youtube, but email/osn/slashdot worked well enough ;)

Surfing OSNEWS in Opera on the train every morning and afternoon...good times, good times.

RE[3]: Encouraged
by raver31 (4.04) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 12:27 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Encouraged"
raver31 Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 13

Yeah, the new Opera 4 Beta is amazing, even on my SLVR L7.
It will map a web page onto its servers, then only download the sections you want to look at.

iLust
by google_ninja (3.44) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:07 UTC
google_ninja
Member since:
2006-02-05
Fans: 13

Man, I have been lusting after this since the very first rumor when apple was buying up phone parts and people where wondering if they dare hope for an apple phone. The real kick in the pants is the AT&T-only thing, although hopefully this will give them the push they need to improve their network. A long term exclusivity deal could not have been cheap, it wouldn't have made much sense if they didnt plan on upgrading from the worst cell network in america.

Comment by Sexie
by Sexie (1.5) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:22 UTC
Sexie
Member since:
2006-10-25
Fans: 0
let's bet...
by smashIt (1.96) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:30 UTC
smashIt
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

let's bet when apple will recall the first batch of batteries.
I give them 10 month from release ;)

3G?
by mohmoh (1) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:50 UTC
mohmoh
Member since:
2007-06-27
Fans: 0

Apple's iPhone has created quite a bit of hype but it's full of old junk technology. It doesn't even support 3G / HSDPA data transfer protocols. In Finland, land of the Nokia, i have unlimited 3G data transfer plan (~10 dollars month). So with iPhone i can't even listen webradio.

RE: 3G?
by bsharitt (2.16) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 01:02 UTC in reply to "3G?"
bsharitt Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 0

Here in the US, AT&T's 3G coverage is rather weak. Right now the only widely availiable 3G seems to be from CDMA carriers, with Sprint leading the way, though Verizon seems to be working to catch up.

RE: 3G?
by Dark_Knight (2.24) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 01:47 UTC in reply to "3G?"
Dark_Knight Member since:
2005-07-10
Fans: 1

Hopefully by the time Apple releases the iPhone in Canada on Rogers network which will most likely be late Q4 it will be a version with HSDPA support and push email capability. Also any bugs found with the AT&T customers should be squashed by the time Canada gets the iPhone.

RE[2]: 3G?
by watchingeyes (2.32) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 02:13 UTC in reply to "RE: 3G?"
watchingeyes Member since:
2007-05-04
Fans: 0

Except Rogers, like AT&T in the US, has a downright awful network. I'm buying out my contract with Rogers and will never look back, iPhone or no iPhone.

And what are you talking about? Push email was demonstrated on the iPhone during the keynote way back in january.

RE[3]: 3G?
by andrewshalin (1.5) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 13:41 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: 3G?"
andrewshalin Member since:
2007-06-26
Fans: 0

Where in Canada are you? I've been with Rogers for 4 years now and never had a single problem. I have a Sony Ericsson K790 right now and it works perfectly on their network, and I'm in Halifax - quite smaller province and city. Of course, EDGE is a bit slow for some stuff, and I find North American prices for wireless to be outrageous. I lived in Germany and Ukraine for 14 years in total and you can't even compare North America to those countries.

RE[4]: 3G?
by watchingeyes (2.32) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 23:35 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: 3G?"
watchingeyes Member since:
2007-05-04
Fans: 0

I live out West, in Calgary Alberta. I've lived here most of my life, and to be honest, have used TELUS outside of AB but never Rogers. Perhaps it's specific to this region, but I'm far from the only person I know who has switched from Rogers to TELUS for that very reason. (And this was long before I started working for TELUS).

Well...
by _mikk (2.16) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 00:55 UTC
_mikk
Member since:
2005-10-19
Fans: 0

It sounds good, but I don't quite like the fact that I would need 6 steps to place a phone call!

I mean, this is a phone in it's primary function.
I would understand that if someone modified an iPod to be able to call people, that might not have been to intuitive.
Okay. But in phone? 6 steps? Common!

I hope the fix that, I really do.

RE: Well...
by Arun (1.56) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 05:51 UTC in reply to "Well..."
Arun Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 2

Most cell phones it is still 4 steps:

1. Unlock phone /Flip open phone.
2. select recent calls or contacts
3. find contact number.
4. press talk button

The iPhone has
5. Select phone app.

Unlock phone on the iphone is two steps
1. Hit sleep start button
2. slide finger to unlock

Most candy bar phones require you to do a two step process to unlock, click menu + * or some button then *

There is one extra step on the iPhone if you want to dial a number on the keypad as I see it.

Let's not make this such a big deal.

RE[2]: Well...
by suryad (2.64) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 12:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Well..."
suryad Member since:
2005-07-09
Fans: 1

3 steps on a p990i if you look in the address book and 2 if you have them on speed dial. The Iphone still looks cool. I am not sure if I would like a touchscreen all the time to use. I like the tactile feel of buttons and the rate plans is ridiculous. But I do like that visual voicemail feature.

RE[3]: Well...
by D3M0N (1.76) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 15:37 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Well..."
D3M0N Member since:
2005-07-09
Fans: 3

The rate plans really aren't that different for other US carriers with the combination of voice and data - although the CDMA carriers same unlimited data for ~$20 uses EVDO instead of ancient and crappy EDGE. The new rate plans are much better than Cingular/AT&T used to be. $30.00 for 10MB of data in the past - the new rate plans are less for more.

RE[2]: Well...
by vimh (3) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 16:22 UTC in reply to "RE: Well..."
vimh Member since:
2006-02-04
Fans: 2

Your have a good point. However if you're going to call something revolutionary, shouldn't you make an effort to actually make it easier to do something?

Saying the iPhone dialing isn't any worse than other phones also says it's not any better.

RE[3]: Well...
by Arun (1.56) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 16:45 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Well..."
Arun Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 2

Your have a good point. However if you're going to call something revolutionary, shouldn't you make an effort to actually make it easier to do something?

If all the iPhone did was make calls I can see your point. The iPhone is a convergence device and offers the best of what other phone manufacturers have failed to do with almost a decade of experience.

Visual voice mail itself is revolutionary for any cell phone on the market. How may steps does it take to parse 10 voice mails on just about any phone?

On the iPhone getting to the most important message is the same number of steps everytime. On traditional phones getting to any message in a sequential fashion is always tedious.

Saying the iPhone dialing isn't any worse than other phones also says it's not any better.

As phones have evolved making a call has always involved more steps.

The first gen land phones were pickup -> dial (rotary or keypad)-> hangup.

Cordless phones now require you to pickup->dial->push talk->push end-> hangup up or putdown.

Cell phones require-> pick up->flip/unlock->dial/ lookup number->press talk/green button->press red button->lock/close flip.

The more phones evolve the more steps is takes to make a call. Phones now are no longer phones but are now internet terminals, music video players, GPS units, etc. etc...

If you really care about how easy it is to dial stick to fixed landline phone with a basic keypad. Wireless is not for you.

RE[4]: Well...
by _mikk (2.16) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 18:13 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Well..."
_mikk Member since:
2005-10-19
Fans: 0

If you really care about how easy it is to dial stick to fixed landline phone with a basic keypad. Wireless is not for you.


Well, not exactly.
Wireless is about convenience, not necessarily about features. I know few people who use it as just a phone. I agree though, that iPhone is not just a phone, but still...

Too expensive
by Supreme Dragon (1.16) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 01:09 UTC
Supreme Dragon
Member since:
2007-03-04
Fans: 0

The iPhone is too expensive, it is not worth what Apple is charging for it.

RE: Too expensive
by nanobaka (2.5) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 01:38 UTC in reply to "Too expensive"
nanobaka Member since:
2006-03-16
Fans: 0

That's only one of the problems. I certainly ain't buying a $500+ phone where I can't replace the battery. It's unacceptable.

RE[2]: Too expensive
by tryphcycle (0.04) on Thu 28th Jun 2007 19:28 UTC in reply to "RE: Too expensive"
tryphcycle Member since:
2006-02-16
Fans: 1

"That's only one of the problems. I certainly ain't buying a $500+ phone where I can't replace the battery. It's unacceptable."

i bet you 100 bucks, with in 1 week there is a how too on opening the iPhone and removing the battery! i'll bet you another 100 that with in 1 month... you'll be able to send the iphone to newer or some one similar, and they will replace the bat!

Meebo
by sid32 (1.5) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 01:25 UTC
sid32
Member since:
2007-06-27
Fans: 0

Shame about the limited txt msgs in a month. But why can't you just use meebo.com and send msgs that way. Then your just using data and not sms..

RE: Meebo
by bsharitt (2.16) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 01:46 UTC in reply to "Meebo"
bsharitt Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 0

That's the only thing that lets me forgive Apple's lack of IM, the full Safari web browser that will allow a meeboish(though hopefully iPhone tailored) IM client. Actually it may be for the best since an iPhone version of iChat would probably be AIM and Jabber only.

RE[2]: Meebo
by ThawkTH (3.36) on Wed 27th Jun 2007 03:34 UTC in reply to "RE: Meebo"
ThawkTH Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 1

The built in AJAX support means you'll probably see a few iPhone apps tailored just for this purpose...

Plus there's always the chance of the iPhone being hacked, and lots of homebrew apps being available.

Geeks make the world such an interesting and fun place - especially those a lot smarter than me ;)

SuperDaveOsbourne
Member since:
2007-06-24
Fans: 0

Don't worry, if you can code, you can do iPhone. Its going to be very open and very full of functionality. Anyone on the iPhone bash list is just a moron. The closed arch phone of yesteryear is about to take it on the chin numerous times.

watchingeyes Member since:
2007-05-04
Fans: 0

Ummm, the iPhone doesn't include flash. And considering the iPhone runs on one of the worst networks in the US, web apps are far from ideal.

I think, even if Apple had to forgo things like visual voicemail (so that they didn't need to work directly with a carrier), they should have offered a CDMA version of the iPhone (I've already ruled the iPhone out up here in Canada because I'm in the process of buying out my Rogers contract).

elsewhere Member since:
2005-07-13
Fans: 16

(I've already ruled the iPhone out up here in Canada because I'm in the process of buying out my Rogers contract).


You'd better be prepared to rule out many, many, many more phones once you leave the Rogers-exclusive world of GSM. You're moving to betamax in a VHS world.

Rogers isn't perfect, but when I compare the service to my corporate-issue Bell phone, it's miles ahead. I actually have dead spots in my own condo with Bell, yet Rogers holds a signal in my elevator all the way down to my underground parking. Absolutely no comparison. And for Rogers' flaws, at least they'll let me use whatever the hell phone I want on the network, whenever I want. SIMs are just brilliant.

But then again, while I have no interest in getting one, I still shudder to think of the data plan rates when they release the iPhone. I already feel violated every month on my puny 60MB bbconnect plan.