Post a Comment
Good call, I wish my brain would spell natively. I meant natively but it seems that the edit has timed out. I guess that is why re-reading comments before submission is a good thing
(for some reason aspell doesn't seem to have 'natively' in its dictanary, maybe that was the issue.)
Lets hope these bills pass, forcing Microsoft to naively support ODF opening the office playing field for all users
Actually this is only one option and from most people's point of view the better one.
Another option, and likely from Microsoft's point of view the better one, is to circumvent the spirit of the law but following its letters: by pushing even harder for their format to become an official ISO standard.
Very true. My guess is we can start expecting Microsoft to start greasing the pockets of many politicians to keep OpenDoc out.
Kind of a side thought here, but I always get a chuckle out the government. One day they sue Microsoft for being a monopoly and not playing fair. The next day they tell you that their websites are only compatible with Microsoft IE or that they only accept Microsoft Office document formats.
I'm sure OpenDoc will have a fight on it's hands trying to supplant Microsoft's document format.
Note that OpenDoc died a horrible, painful death at the hands of Steve Jobs in 1997.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDoc
ODF, on the other hand, is alive and well.
The XML-based document format is a rival to Microsoft's Office technology.
Actually, the ODF format is an ISO approved international standard, and microsoft's confusingly named format is rivaling ODF. Although microsoft tries to turn its proprietary "Open" XML format into an open/international standard, it is not. See;
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2007011720521698
- hayalci






