Post a Comment
Excerpt from Intel internal memo:
Today, we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives. We have created, for the first time in all history, a garden of pure ideology. Where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing truths. Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth. We are one people, with one will, one resolve, one cause. Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion. We shall prevail!
...
Edited 2006-11-30 18:43
The architecture name is Core, not Core Duo.
Hence, the third iteration of the architecture name would be Core 3, with CPUs named Core 3 Solo, Core 3 Duo, and so on.
The Duo is a modifier of the architecture name, and not part of the architecture name. Hence, the name will not be "Core Duo 3".
It would have been nice if Intel had actually waited until the Core architecture was released before using the Core name. That way, things would make sense now. The whole "Core 2" naming scheme is crap.
The Pentium-M should have remained the Pentium-M, they should never have renamed it Core.
The Core 2 should have been the first one called the Core, since it was the first CPU based on the Core architecture.
Who ever it is at Intel that runs the marketing division should be canned (in all senses of the word).






